- ‹ previous
- 544 of 1535
- next ›
Who's Hating on Mrs. Obama's Garden?
Michelle Obama’s plan to plant a vegetable garden on the White House lawn is old news—everyone’s been bombarded with that adorable photo of schoolchildren tilling the south lawn with Mrs. O.—and no one seems to have much of a problem with it. Sure, it’s not the first White House garden. It’s mostly a PR stunt, a lovely vegetable patch that children can visit on field trips. Maybe some of them will plant a garden of their own, or visit a farmers' market, or just eat more fresh produce. What could be wrong with that?
A lot, according to the Mid America CropLife Association. The large agricultural association was so horrified by the idea of a vegetable garden that they wrote an open letter to Michelle Obama (Mrs. Barack Obama to be precise) and sent it to industrial farmers' advocacy groups. You can read the entire letter on the web, but here are a few choice excerpts:
Much of the food considered not wholesome or tasty is the result of how it is stored or prepared rather than how it is grown. Fresh foods grown conventionally are wholesome and flavorful yet more economical. Local and conventional farming is not mutually exclusive...
If Americans were still required to farm to support their family's basic food and fiber needs, would the U.S. have been leaders in the advancement of science, communication, education, medicine, transportation and the arts?
The White House is planning to have an "organic" garden on the grounds to provide fresh fruits and vegetables for the Obama's and their guests. While a garden is a great idea, the thought of it being organic made Janet Braun, CropLife Ambassador Coordinator and I shudder.
Really, shudder? Organic produce may be over-hyped, but the real problem is that "organic" produce doesn't do enough to find a truly sustainable solution. The Mother Jones food issue presents a number of proposals for the future of agriculture, (check back later this week for a special forum!) none of which involve reverting back to our Homo erectus habits. Or hating on home gardens.





























White House Garden
This is wonderful to see ~ fresh produce, community involvement, positive PR. What a shame that the MACA feels this is a threat to their bottom line. There is nothing that tastes as good as home grown fruits/vegetables just picked and prepared. MACA blames storage as the reason for tasteless produce. Whatever it is, I still choose to grow my own simply because it just plain tastes better.
The next logical step would be to create a composting area. Teach the local students the benefits of turning kitchen and garden debris into mulch to be used to naturally fertilize the vegetables for which they are guardians.
Chickens would provide another source of fertilizer for the garden and fresh eggs for the Obama's meals. Ok, done laughing? Anyway, why not set a standard? It wouldn't be the first time the White House has had chickens and a vegetable garden now, would it?
Cyndi
Sustainability
tagged as:- solution
So sorry for big Aga....but I choose to grow most of my own food because they lie, and government reguation will not protect you from harm..The revolving door of regulation and industry lobbyists is well documented.
This is a great oppertunity to teach many of the principles that we must implement on a large scale to get back to a sustainable, healthy model....No wonder why they shudder....
The horror I face is that Costco is selling GMO bedding vegetables which can drift into my organic space........
MACA is...
...a PR outfit for big agrochem. They do not exist to promote farming or farmers per se. CropLife associations around the world (including here, in South Africa) are well funded organisations that exist ultimately to promote the chemical products, genetically engineered seeds and services of companies like Bayer, DuPont, Syngenta, and Monsanto.
They are extremely good at inserting themselves into policymaking bodies and thinktanks as providers of 'neutral' agricultural advice, even though virtually all their funding comes from agrochemical giants. They avoid appearances of one-sidedness by not using strident language. They seldom mount high profile campaigns in defense of their interests, preferring instead to set up 'working groups' and 'community liason groups' to push their agenda while appearing to bridge divides between toxin-spraying farmers and environmentalists or farmworkers' rights groups.
Their normal strategy is to portray any problems with agrochemicals, for instance children growing breasts at extremely young ages here in South Africa, as the unexpected exceptions rather than commonsense outcomes of releasing vast amounts of known toxins into the environment. CropLife never admits that pesticides in general are possibly problematic: problems are due to individual 'uninformed' farmers 'misapplying' pesticides that would be harmless if 'responsibly used'. Etc.
Take a look at MACA's board of directors.
http://www.maca.org/officers/
That's all you need to know right there.
Adam Welz
Obamas garden
tagged as:- result
articels like that are a flicker of hope. Thank you Adam Welz.
With respect from Austria
reinhard resch
dr.resch@gmx.net
MACA's...
..mission statment says it all.
Enough said.
gardens
Harvesting, handling and distribution are serious issues all home gardeners have, especially when everything ripens at once. The environment around the White House also will have few natural predators of bugs and fungi, and organic methods rely on longer-term care of the whole garden environment. I think you have framed the remarks "hating on her garden" with excessive hyperbole.
There remain many good things about the Obama garden, including the simple pleasure people can have when re-connecting with the earth. Gardening is good for the body and soul, and when approached as a community or family project, it is hard to see why anyone would speak ill of it.
Nevertheless, there is some idealism present in the endeavor, as any veteran gardener or vegetable farmer will attest. What can it hurt to encourage people to try raising their own food?
Do you REALLY think agribusiness is threatened by Michelle Obama's project? I think this is media hyperbole-- making a mountain out of a molehill.
Maybe I'm wrong about the spokespeople you quoted. Maybe they had more to say that was not printed.
Either way, we are fortunate in America, that food production, harvesting, handling and distribution has freed us from sustenance agriculture.
The letter is linked in the
The letter is linked in the article, and reading it shows that your point has some validity. The letter essentially lodges a comment that agribusiness is consious and proactive regarding environmental practices and nutritional quality, something their industry has every right to do.
The comments from the letter were not taken out of context by the article, but neither were they thematic. You should ask yourself, however: why were these particular concerns expressed?
You have to admit that the letter and its concerns come off as somewhat defensive, and that it seems to be a reaction to slights or threats from the administration to the industry that have never been expressed. Don't straw-men usually indicate bad motives?
Despite the appropriate protocol of their letter, it represents evidence that the agri-industry fears (and probably vehemently hates) the promotion of gardening as a value of citizenship. Your distrust of this article appears to be misplaced.
The beets and carrots are going in the ground this weekend, in two new raised beds full of compost and sandy silt. I still have a job, and still spend a healthy budget on groceries.
gardens
Harvesting, handling and distribution are serious issues all home gardeners have, especially when everything ripens at once. The environment around the White House also will have few natural predators of bugs and fungi, and organic methods rely on longer-term care of the whole garden environment. I think you have framed the remarks "hating on her garden" with excessive hyperbole.
There remain many good things about the Obama garden, including the simple pleasure people can have when re-connecting with the earth. Gardening is good for the body and soul, and when approached as a community or family project, it is hard to see why anyone would speak ill of it.
Nevertheless, there is some idealism present in the endeavor, as any veteran gardener or vegetable farmer will attest. What can it hurt to encourage people to try raising their own food?
Do you REALLY think agribusiness is threatened by Michelle Obama's project? I think this is media hyperbole-- making a mountain out of a molehill.
Maybe I'm wrong about the spokespeople you quoted. Maybe they had more to say that was not printed.
Either way, we are fortunate in America, that food production, harvesting, handling and distribution has freed us from sustenance agriculture.
And how much produce can the produce with pesticides?
tagged as:- solution
Here's the answer: http://www.kingsleycommission.com/2009/04/according-to-la-vida-locavore-mid.html.
Michelle Obama's Garden
I think Ms. Obama's garden is a great idea. Not only do you get fresh vegetables, but it teaches children that gardening is an enjoyable and relaxing lifelong passtime. I always found working with plants and the soil a great means of stress reduction, whether vegetable or flower gardening. This is a great way to get children away from the TV, the computer, and video games and outside in the sun and fresh air, working on something that ultimately rewards them for the work they put in to it. It also has potential for children and parents to work together. Whether a small patch beside the house or a backyard garden, it's a positive message. Kudos Ms. Obama for this brilliant idea. (An asside: The more people that decide to take up Ms. Obama's garden idea, the better it is for the economy- seed companies, nurseries, local bix box centers that offer gardening accessories, tool companies, etc, and it didn't require a billion dollar government program!)
Ms. Obama`s garden
great articel, I love it
Reinhard Resch
Austria
dr.resch@gmx.net
Never ending story
Sure, we can grow our own food, use wood for cooking and heating, dig a hole for an outhouse, use kerosene lamps, walk or ride bicycles , unplug from the grid, raise animals for food, etc. The bottom line is, if we do these things, our way of life, out culture, our economy, Capitalism will be threatened. Hell, give me another beer and let me watch NASCAR. I gotta go to work Monday, if I don't get laid off. It's the end of the world as we know it. The Times They Are A Changing. Masters of War. We will all wind up either Fruits or Vegatables. I'm gonna move to Iowa and marry me a Fruit. That way I will fit into the New World Order. I guess this is the round about way to say what 2Pac said, "Fuck All Y'all". And, I mean that in a sensitive,kind, caring, loving way. Wish Michelle the very best.
Grow something
Dear beer-guzzling, Nascar-watchin' Boob:
Noone is saying we must do all these other things you mention. I do none of those. What's being offered is the idea to grow some food. You don't have to grow everything. How about just one or two plants, even in pots if you have no yard? To get us closer to where our food comes from, to increase our skills, to do something worthwhile that is positive. Even to get us away from wasting our lives in front of a tube by being outside to get some air.
The fact that so few of us have any clue how to garden is the real problem. The fact that many are so overwhelmed or apathetic, and need to numb out in front of mindless entertainment that does nothing supportive - that is the frightening state we are in. Boob, what if you lose that job? Having a plant or two won't fix your problems, but it's a start. Nascar provides you nothing but distraction. Every human should have gardening skills. We don't, and look where we are.
I don't know why I bother. Your type of person will never really hear this, because you are hooked into believing the Republican and religious rhetoric that is meant to connive the poor into helping the rich continue to get richer. This all happens on YOUR back, while you eke out a meager subsistence. Yes, the world is a-changing. Thankfully.
Instead of marrying a fruit, why don't you just go grow one?
Ms. Obama`s garden
A nice replay. Here in Europa, in earlier times poor people only could survive having there own garden. Okay, at that time there was no TV, no electric light, everybody went to bed early and rose early, so they had time for the garden keeping them alive. We developed a new concept for gardening. With that technic you have about three times the output with a fraction of the normal work. And all organic, you don`t need any pesticides or herbicides. To describe that in this forum is not possible. If you are interested, write me an e-mail.
Best wishes from Austria
Sorry for the bad English
Reinhard Resch
dr.resch@gmx.net
home gardens
tagged as:- solution
First of all, I grew up in an era when "victory garden" was patriotic. My father had a garden in our yard or nearby all my life. To this day I measure the quality of vegetables that I buy against the quality that I am used to growing up and usually their is no comparison. I have a sister and brother-in-law who keep up the garden tradition and many relatives including a nephew.
At the same time I am grateful for the variety of fruits and vegetables from all over the world during all seasons that I cannot duplicate here in New England.
Yes it is hard work BUT big agriculture cannot compare to the home garden. My father died in 1976 and my sisters and I sold the house in 1996 after my mother passed away.
To this day, 33 years later, the former neighbors on my father's street still talk about my father's garden. I can only have one of his tomatoes in memory.
Mrs Obama is to be lauded for this effort.
Like every year before we
Like every year before we will grow a vegetable garden. There is nothing more satisfying and enjoyable to go out there on a early summer morning and pick sugar snap peas, fresh cucumbers, tomatoes, green bean, summer squash and fresh herbs. Even the winter squash in fall tastes better; always sweet, never bland and watery. Lets not forget potatoes. There is no comparison to the toxic waste laden stuff the supermarket offers.
We also have a few chickens; and yes, those eggs really do taste better.
My mother did this until she was 88 years old and only a broken (now mending ankle) was able to stop her.
So factory farms, get a grip. The majority of people can't tell a dandelion from arugula and many can only identify one "vegetable" (the french fry.) They will be your customers for ever.
Great logic, MACA. Next
Great logic, MACA. Next we'll have car manufacturers telling people how terrible it is to walk, since driving is so important to the economy. And we'll have video game manufacturers saying playing Little League is affecting our kids' ability to fit into their peer group. How do those MACA reps keep a straight face when they say their bs? I guess they value their paychecks more than they do being honest and moral.
A pro gardener friend of ours is helping us convert our yard (full of roses, vegetables, berries, and ornamental trees) into an organic garden. We wouldn't have known how to do it ourselves - the only info you get at most places like Home Depot is what pesticide to use when you see trouble. We had been using those so-called "Safer Sprays", and even with face-masks and gloves on, those chemicals were nasty. Now, we're just building up the health of the soil and plants with natural fertilizers and pruning/tilling, and - you know what - they've look BETTER this year than they have before, and we haven't sprayed a darn rose or vegetable.
We aren't planning on just living off our yard (not by a long shot), but why should we spray toxic chemicals in our own back yard when we don't need to?
Farming is good for the
Farming is good for the soul. An excellent passtime for children.
farming can be good.
farming can be good. Sometime dangerous.
laptop charger