«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Good News on the Border Fence?
Maybe. The AP reports that 28 miles of virtual border fence was approved by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff yesterday. The virtual fence will include 98-foot unmanned towers equipped with radar, sensor devices and cameras capable of distinguishing people from cattle at a distance of about 10 miles. (MoJo reported on the controversy over this fence from an environmental perspective in Gone. Think: endangered wildlife can't cross a real fence either).
Kim Vacariu, of The Wildlands Project, tells me that if the virtual fence "becomes reliably functional, it would indicate that the recommendations generated through our Border Ecological Workshops, action requests to Congress, and other efforts are beginning to reach the officials who are making security infrastructure decisions—that they are seeing the importance of protecting borderland ecology from the effects of wall-building. However, it's important to note that construction of [the virtual fence] requires road-building and associated other infrastructure that continues to degrade borderlands ecology. So we need to wait and see just how this system will work. If it does, we're taking a step in the right direction."
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent and 2008 winner of the John Burroughs Medal Award. You can read from her new book, The Fragile Edge, and other writings, here.
Comments
I'd like to hear which 28 miles that was, since down here on the battlefield it is an extremely hot issue, with Chertoff filing court cases against many landowners who resisted even allowing Corps of Engineers surveyors on their property.
Will the jagarundi or ocelot know which areas have huge fences and which do not?
Except for a few crackpots down here, most everyone wants a virtual fence from Brownsville to El Paso and NO NEW REAL FENCES. Thank you,
sam
bring the troops home from Iraq and put them on the border. No need for a fence.
Posted by: Johnny on 02/15/08 at 7:38 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Living Green in Denmark (4)
Frisco Kid wrote:
The average resident in metropolitan San Francisco emitted...
[more]
Greenland's Ice, Going, Going. . . (3)
Olaf wrote:
La Nina and El Nino always was, always will be. This is ju...
[more]
What's the Most Polluting Car? (32)
john carter wrote:
hey china is the worst polluter,just look at the olympics,...
[more]
Primary Sources: The 1940 Census on "White" (7)
AA wrote:
Racial categories are necessary for Affirmative Action pro...
[more]
Here Be Arctic Dragons (2)
The IceMan wrote:
An expert from the National Autonomous University of Mexi...
[more]
Running From The Waves in Beijing (4)
Serginho wrote:
And that RED join Sen. Inhofe.......
[more]
More Cell-Phone Wariness From Docs (4)
joffan wrote:
I like the snarky photo.
What the evidence says, and will...
[more]
McCain Recycles His Green Image...From MoJo? (8)
laptop battery wrote:
Could you imagine trying to feed all the bills into that m...
[more]
Solar Superhighways (3)
Get It Straight wrote:
Asphalt can Store energy, as anyone who has tried t...
[more]
Antarctic Sea Ice Increase: Fodder for Global Warming Skeptics? (25)
not nakis wrote:
nakis you ignorant but. Your sentences are incongruent and...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Sam Wells on 02/14/08 at 9:44 PM Respond