- ‹ previous
- 3802 of 7913
- next ›
188 More Species Deemed Near Extinction
Today the World Conservation Union (also known, for reasons too arcane to go into, as the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources or IUCN) came out with its "Red List" of species threatened with extinction. There are 188 additions to the list, bringing the total up to 16,306. There's particularly bad news about great apes and coral reefs, but across the taxonomic board, the news is "quite bleak," said Jane Smart, who heads the group's species program.
As Mother Jones' Julia Whitty wrote in Gone: Mass Extinction and the Hazards of Earth's Vanishing Biodiversity:
1 in 4 mammals, 1 in 8 birds, 1 in 3 amphibians, 1 in 3 conifers and other gymnosperms are at risk of extinction. The peril faced by other classes of organisms is less thoroughly analyzed, but fully 40 percent of the examined species of planet Earth are in danger, including up to 51 percent of reptiles, 52 percent of insects, and 73 percent of flowering plants.
By the most conservative measurebased on the last century's recorded extinctionsthe current rate of extinction is 100 times the background rate. But eminent Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson and other scientists estimate that the true rate is more like 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate. The actual annual sum is only an educated guess, because no scientist believes the tally of life ends at the 1.5 million species already discovered; estimates range as high as 100 million species on Earth, with 10 million as the median guess. Bracketed between best- and worst-case scenarios, then, somewhere between 2.7 and 270 species are erased from existence every day. Including today.
We now understand that the majority of life on Earth has never beenand will never beknown to us. In a staggering forecast, Wilson predicts that our present course will lead to the extinction of half of all plant and animal species by the year 2100.
You probably had no idea. Few do. A poll by the American Museum of Natural History finds that 7 in 10 biologists believe that mass extinction poses a colossal threat to human existence, a more serious environmental problem than even its contributor, global warming, and that the dangers of mass extinction are woefully underestimated by most everyone outside of science. In the 200 years since French naturalist Georges Cuvier first floated the concept of extinction, after examining fossil bones and concluding "the existence of a world previous to ours, destroyed by some sort of catastrophe," we have only slowly recognized and attempted to correct our own catastrophic behavior.
The rate of extinction is due to a variety of factors, but nearly all are human induced, including climate change, habitat loss, invasive species (transported by us), the plight of the oceans, and so on. As Julia notes:
All these disappearing species are part of a fragile membrane of organisms wrapped around Earth so thin, writes E.O. Wilson, that it "cannot be seen edgewise from a space shuttle, yet so internally complex that most species composing it remain undiscovered." We owe everything to this membrane of life. Literally everything. The air we breathe. The food we eat. The materials of our homes, clothes, books, computers, medicines. Goods and services that we can't even imagine we'll someday need will come from species we have yet to identify. The proverbial cure for cancer. The genetic fountain of youth. Immortality. Mortality.
The living membrane we so recklessly destroy is existence itself.
Read Julia's article. It will haunt you. As will the accompanying photo essay by Richard Ross.









Digg
Reddit
Twitter
Facebook
Buzz Up!
StumbleUpon
MySpace
LinkedIn
Delicious
Furl
Google
Yahoo






Species have been coming and going since day one..
Amesy, your pithy little statement must have seemed so sage to you. Yet it ignores the fact that as the theoretically most adaptive and intelligent of all species, we can choose to make sometimes simple changes to our lifestyles to ensure the safety and well-being of other species and the balance of the natural world. Any old dumb creature might bumble through the meadow, crushing smaller life along it's reckless path -is that good enough four our noble race?
Ames, You also appear to have missed the point that we are causing species to go extinct at about 1000 times the normal background rate of extinction. We have truly earned our place in the history of this planet as a catastrophe, the sixth major catastrophic event in fact. We are causing the sixth great extinction. It is already greater than the one that took out the non-avian dinosaurs 65.3 million years ago. Some are already saying that it is a worse extinction than the PT boundary 250 million years ago, the prior record holder.
Don't worry Misanthropic, the old standbys of plagues and pestilence will take care of the arrogant humans. AIDS(engineered by the CIA) strikes at the very act of reproduction. Science will save the elites and kill off the dregs.
CFR, you mean the same science that gave us the A-bomb, PCBs and VX nerve agent?
Without "the dregs", as you call your neighbors, who are the scientists going to use for their experiments?
CFR,
Your first statement sounded quite reasonable. What happened after that?
So I was reading about this today on globalgrind.com, my site for life!, and it really saddened me. We don't take enough care of our earth and surroundings. We treat the world around us like garbage and unfortunately not everyone is willing to make the little extra effort to change that. It takes more than just one person to make something like that happen, but here's hoping that things turn around real soon....
...seems WE are the "most invasive species"....