Gay Marriage Leads To Mass Murder?

Homosexuality is no more immoral than Heterosexuality. Which is to say, NOT AT ALL.

However, demeaning and degrading fellow human beings? THAT is immoral. I am sure God would take issue with that. If there was such a person.

These people don't even have the common sense to be embarassed or ashamed of themselves and their bigotry.

Thankfully, they will lose this battle.

Guys like Peters are utterly bizarre. He tries for a completely untenable connection between mass murderers and gay rights even as his brethren (Beck, Hannity, et. al.) deny any causal relationship between their hateful comments and those same mass murderers. What astounds me--truly--is that these people, apparently, all believe they're ticketed for heaven. Unless, of course, they're simply knowing liars. If the latter, it depresses me that they're that cynical. I'd almost prefer them to be self-righteous.

It is not in my nature to be mean to people with whom I disagree. Assuming that statement actually means directly proportional to the decline in morality, I am inclined to think he may be right!!!!
Maybe the killer was a religious zealot who was is just sick of all that immorality evident and gaining upper hand in modern times. Or the reverend also has sometimes inadvertent thoughts of blasting the world to pieces! I know this is rather mean of me, but I hope to excused. Saying that gay marriage is immoral, is meanness too, because it implies that the two persons voluntarily entering a socially legalized relationship for whatever purposes is wrong! Why is it wrong? They are hurting nobody? They are certainly not condemning the way of life, that the reverend holds for more moral? They are gracious enough to leave him alone with his life. He should be gracious enough to leave them with theirs!

I sincerely beg his apologies for being forced to indulge myself in this rather equally vitriolic argument, but it is meant to enlighten the reverend, how much we can be off the mark in our convictions. Of course I am sure the reverend as no such thoughts, this is a deliberate bias on my part meant to draw his attention to the bias evident in his judgment about the motivation behind the actions of other people!

And lastly I assure you reverend that Natural Laws are more powerful than we all can imagine. They will put an end to it. The excessive specialization in the cretaceous and the excesses that Nature indulged had to end! You had the demise of the reptiles!
The Greeks knew about it. They even had a word for it: Hybris! But as ever and always there will be something new, and perhaps even more beautiful coming around the corner than the Mammals and angiosperms and playboy bunnies, boulevard-news celebrities and junk food, T.V and all that McLuhan Trash!

Humans are all born the same, however, during the process of socialization which is turning from a biological creature into a social person by exposure to 1- Family 2-Friends 3- School would shape up the features of one's personality. Now, that "tainted" or "immoral" content is surely in decline. How? The three elements before mentioned have been drastically changed in the last century due to the massive change within the fabric of ALL societies on the face of earth as well as the fairly easy accessibility to ALL sorts of information (Moral and Immoral) on the World Wide Web.

A child could be exposed to the internet long before he/she would make friends at school, therefore, individualism has taken a million shapes in the different layers of society. A simple example is, an unethical upbringing would produce a criminal personality---> A criminal personal is more likely to molest a child---> A molested child is more likely to become a homosexual---> A homosexual person is more likely to exhibit his/her acquired sexual orientation to others through uncountable mediums. Comparing homosexuals with criminals IS harsh but its a reality.

Homosexuality is DEFINITELY not a result of genetic reasons as well as Criminality. Here's the connections folks and to gay guys who would take this very objective point of view very personally I say: Don't let Hubris control you and use your head rather than attacking people for expressing their thoughts and presenting their arguments and by the way I am a homosexual myself but I realist one.

Peace to all

Um. I think our (remaining) Native American brothers and sisters would be justified in disputing that mass murder is a recent phenomenon. The perversion of morality espoused by some churches dates back that far as well. Coincidence?

Wait so let me see if I got this right. A guy who got a bunch of money from the justice department to police the words sent through the TV by those behind the Christian sexual revolution has proven without a a sigle doubt or bit of evidence a link between catching the gay and seemingly unrelated distant events?

If the gay causes completely unrelated things far away to occur could it be possible the state of Vermont also contracting the gay will cause a completely unrelated distant good thing to occur rather then a bad thing? in this case filling my brain with all the biochem and enzyme kinetics material for this term.

Last year the midterms I took in physical chemistry and biophysics which fell on the same day the judges in California announced people could catch the gay as a legal couple I got A's on both midterms.

Could it be possible to request the next time two people with the gay being together is made legal the stop lights on my route to school be finally resynchronized. They have been backing up traffic for over a year now.