« Desperate Republicans Try Sex | Blog Index | Bush Says Administration is "Constantly" Changing Course »
Some Officials May Not Be That Upset Over A North Korean Nuclear Test
What doesn't make the news (for example, that Senate investigators recently accused Grover Norquist of major fraud) is more significant than what does, these days. Think Progress points out today that a little bombshell buried in a Washington Post story has gone unnoticed: "Some senior officials even said they were quietly rooting for a [North Korean nuclear] test, believing that would finally clarify the debate within the administration."
The story, "Rice Sees Bright Spot In China's New Role Since N. Korean Test," is about Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's claim that China is becoming "more of a partner on issues of importance to the United States." And, as Think Progress points out, Post reporter Glenn Kessler believes that Rice may be one of the officials who believes that North Korea's nuclear test was a "plus" for the U.S.
Here is an illuminating timeline on North Korea's nuclear program.
Posted by Diane E. Dees on 10/23/06 at 10:50 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
January 7, 2007 - January 13, 2007
December 31, 2006 - January 6, 2007
December 24, 2006 - December 30, 2006
December 17, 2006 - December 23, 2006
December 10, 2006 - December 16, 2006
December 3, 2006 - December 9, 2006
November 26, 2006 - December 2, 2006
RECENT COMMENTS
If Only a Doping Scandal Could Mean Victory in Iraq (6)
Elizabeth wrote:
I think John is being facetious, at least I hope so. And I...
[more]
Lawmakers Have a Sense of Humor About This "Paying For Sex" Business (1)
Gotcha wrote:
"only to watch the color drain from the faces of unsuspect...
[more]
How Do You "Make" a Terrorist Threat? (2)
Nomo Jo wrote:
The Thought Police are apparently well-funded and hard at ...
[more]
Political Trivia for July 26 (2)
Nicholas Beaudrot wrote:
Sounds right to me. I almost forgot about the Poland joke ...
[more]
Survey: Muslim Support for Suicide Bombings Declining (5)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
John,
It wouldn't take much. The IRA already bombs people...
[more]
Alabama: Where the Constitution and DNA Don't Matter (2)
Misanthropic Scott wrote:
I have a number of issues with the death penalty despite n...
[more]
Dick Morris, Breaking Big Stories. Fred Thompson, Playing the Dirty Money Game (16)
JT Barrie wrote:
"Squeaky Clean" always follows the cleric's rule of thumb...
[more]
Bush/Cheney Threats to the Endangered Species Act (1)
lorsajon wrote:
I pray that Senator McCain gets involved in this because h...
[more]
Leaked Army Karbala Report Shows Iraqi Police Collaborated in Ambush on US Troops (3)
charlie jacksonn wrote:
There is suspicion, by the locals, that the attack was ca...
[more]
FEMA's Post-Brown Efficiency Melts Away (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
I remember at the time the ice was just sitting that conse...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org
U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records
www.PublicRecordsInfo.com
Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com
Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as
Well as County Property Records Search.
www.PublicRecordsIndex.com











There is a belief spouted in some liberal circles that North Korea - a bit player with no resources coveted by US business interests- obtaining nuclear technology could be used as a lever for "preemptive" military action against Iran, a country with significant oil reserves and a potential rival to influence Iraq, a country with more significant oil reserves. The argument will go as follows: "See what happened when we chose to act diplomatically [deferring to China - who host our slave wage labor factories that generate high profit margins]! We should attack them and topple their government B4 they get too powerful. Add in their support for Hizbollah and it's a slam dunk - especially if one of their "clients" destroys a major military installation or does something else spectacularly annoying.
Posted by: JT Barrie on 10/23/06 at 3:59 PM