MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Enticing New Health Care Plan from Little Known Corner of Congress

A new Slate article by Jacob Weisberg examines that state of American health care, from the status quo to Bush's plan to John Edwards' plan to... Ron Wyden's plan?

Yup. The Democratic senator from Oregon has a plan, and it sounds mighty attractive. Imagine if the giant, Byzantine mess that is the current health care system in this country was reduced to this:

Under Wyden's plan, employers would no longer provide health coverage, as they have since World War II. Instead, they'd convert the current cost of coverage into additional salary for employees. Individuals would use this money to buy insurance, which they would be required to have. Private insurance plans would compete on features and price but would have to offer benefits at least equivalent to the Blue Cross "standard" option.

And Wyden is serious about the "universal" aspect of universal health insurance. From a summary of his plan: "Every time an individual interacts with state, local and federal government — registering their car, enrolling their children in school, applying for a driver’s license or paying their taxes — they can be required to verify their enrollment in a private health insurance plan." Also, I'm sure this is music to some people's ears: "Previous and existing health problems, occupation, genetic information, gender and age will no longer be allowed to impact eligibility or the price paid for insurance."

Now you might say, "That's very well and good, but what about the unemployed, low-wage workers, and freelance bloggers? If they can't afford private health insurance now, why would they be able to afford it under the Wyden plan?" Wyden's website is stocked with information on the subject, and in all the "Before Wyden Plan"/"Under Wyden Plan" scenarios you can find there, previously uninsured individuals pay for private insurance at affordable rates. But how? From the same summary:

Employers who do not currently provide health benefits will be required to begin making phased in "Employer Shared Responsibility Payments." These payments will be used to ensure that everyone can afford their health plans by funding premium reductions.

After two years, all employers will pay these "Employer Shared Responsibility Payments," driving down the cost of premiums for employees across the country, the semi-employed, and the unemployed.

Now it's just a matter of getting this thing off the ground. As Weisberg writes in Slate, it might actually have a chance to succeed because Wyden is building support methodically and effectively.

He has support from CEOs, labor leaders, and even one maverick health-insurance executive. And instead of trying to flatten the opposition, as the Clintons did in 1994, Wyden is courting Republicans. He recently got five of the most conservative men in the Senate to join him and four other Democrats as co-signers of a letter to Bush responding to the White House proposal. The letter endorses the principles of universal coverage and cost containment, and proposes that they all work together on a compromise.

Godspeed.






Comments

So, we take away the insurance company's incentive to give low rates, because they can get many people into a group.
Then we give money to the employee who cannot afford the new rates, because he is not in a group. This stratagy is not new, the name of it is DIVIDE & CONQUER. It is accually a plan to enrich the insurance companys, but it does take the burden off of the Government temporarally, and place it on the back of individuals again. The reason we have this problem in the first place, is because Government got involved. Let's keep the Government out and you will see astounding results!

Posted by: Pete on 03/02/07 at 7:14 AM  Respond

lets get the insurance companies out of the equation and control the drug companies and you will see astonishing results. Insurance companies take 20-30% of hte costs of insurance. its called overhead. Medicare's overhead cost is 4.5%.

Posted by: micheal mdgruder on 12/08/07 at 1:40 AM  Respond

Health care: I think that we should take the insurace out of health care. The basic premice for health care insurace is that the shareholders of the insurace company need to make a profit in order to support the health care provider. I think insurance companies can insure everything about me except my health, ie my car, home, business etc. Tax us all equally to pay for universal health care. In 1993 when Clinton was talking about this subject he disclosed what he paid for health care for his family. He said he paid $1200/ year for his premium, that's for him, his wife, and child. $1200/3= $400 / year or $38/month / person for health care for the president of the united states. The Bush economic stimulas package is about to give us all $600. Apply it to universal health care @ $50 / month / person. This would go a long way to paying for health care. Increase the tax if you are over weight, smoke, drink, or other health risk. Lower the tax if you eat heathy, and excersize. A heathy working population won't take as many sick days, will make more money, will pay more taxes, so the gov. will have more money, and we'll all live happier ever after.

Posted by: STEVE POWER on 04/19/08 at 7:29 AM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Enticing New Health Care Plan from Little Known Corner of Congress (3)
STEVE POWER wrote: Health care: I think that we should take the insurace out ... [more]

Arab Street Turns Against Uncle Sam (42)
Muskelaufbau wrote: thanks, good luck... [more]

Clinton Bashes Obama's Weathermen Connection, But What About Her Own? (80)
Gabe wrote: The questions asked by the moderators in the last debate p... [more]

Happy Passover, Jimmy Carter (6)
The Professor wrote: London review of books, 23 march 2006 The Israel Lobby Joh... [more]

In Open Letter, Journalists Slam ABC Debate (24)
John wrote: You know you're absolutely right, McCain was involved in t... [more]

The Smallness of Our Politics on Display at the ABC Debate (60)
Loraine wrote: I think Sharon Ash is on the Clinton campaign staff or pay... [more]

Your Weekly Joe Lieberman Outrage (32)
massimo wrote: William is right that the Arabs never had any problems wit... [more]

A Feminist Hears a Who (140)
Sam wrote: I miss my days as a loyal subscriber to Mother Jones ...ve... [more]

Warning Warning Warning: Nader at 8-10% in Michigan (20)
out of the loop wrote: Folk aren't going to vote for Nader because the Dems aren'... [more]

The Delightful Ernie Chambers Leaves the Nebraska Unicameral (2)
mjameson wrote: Citation? Or is that just your general impression? ... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS