MoJo Blog

« Without Question, the Best Story of the Day | Blog Index | Hey! It's Another Democratic Plan for Iraq! »

2006 Congressional Vote Ratings Released

I'm going to spoil the big surprise up front: Barack Obama is more liberal than Dennis Kucinich.

Now the context. National Journal has put out a series of lists in which they rate every lawmaker in the House and Senate on how they voted in 2006. (There's a link on the Mother Jones News and Politics page, your home for 2008 presidential coverage and general Washington news.) You can see the most liberal and most conservative members of Congress. You can see where Lieberman stands (not the most conservative Dem). And perhaps most interestingly, you can see where the presidential candidates fall.

The New York Times political blog dug a little deeper and found lifetime ratings. The results?

On a scale of one to 100, with 100 being the most liberal, here are the Dems:

Senator Barack Obama: 84.3
Representative Dennis Kucinich: 79.4
Senator Christopher J. Dodd: 79.2
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton: 78.8
Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr.: 76.8

On a scale of one to 100, with 100 being the most conservative, here are the Republicans:

Representative Duncan Hunter: 82.5
Senator Sam Brownback: 81
Representative Tom Tancredo: 75.9
Senator John McCain: 71.8
Senator Chuck Hagel: 71.5
Representative Ron Paul: 51.7

Due to lack of votes in Congress, certain contenders for the nominations are left off.

Posted by Jonathan Stein on 03/02/07 at 9:29 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

Who determines whether a vote is liberal or conservative? For example, would someone who supports the death penalty (for all congressmen and women and certain administration officials), favors abortion (in the case of all religious conservative fundamentalists), opposses enviornmental pollution (including especially speechs by Dick Cheney), supports a maximum wage allowable and supports allowing open discussion of any and all viewpoints in our nation's science classrooms, be classified as a high-ranking liberal, low-ranking liberal, moderate conservative or high-ranking conservative?

Posted by: Richard Aberdeen on 03/02/07 at 2:55 PM

I agree, these rankings are totally useless. Instead, rank them on a graph like this:

http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2

That solves the problem Richard Aberdeen point out. His example politician would end up in the lower left (probably a little bit above Nelson Mandela in the last chart on that page).

Posted by: Sean Robertson on 03/03/07 at 6:56 AM

So reproductive rights don't count as liberal? Or is it just that they don't count as important?

Kucinich has a staunch pro-life voting record. "He supported Bush's reinstatement of the gag rule for recipients of US family planning funds abroad. He supported the Child Custody Protection Act, which prohibits anyone but a parent from taking a teenage girl across state lines for an abortion. He voted for the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which makes it a crime, distinct from assault on a pregnant woman, to cause the injury or death of a fetus. He voted against funding research on RU-486. He voted for a ban on dilation and extraction (so-called partial-birth) abortions without a maternal health exception. He even voted against contraception coverage in health insurance plans for federal workers--a huge work force of some 2.6 million people (and yes, for many of them, Viagra is covered)." -Katha Pollitt

Posted by: April on 03/25/07 at 9:28 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote: The testimony was a complete mess. ... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote: Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul... [more]

Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote: Kirilovslogic, Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th... [more]

NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote: Sneezer, First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is... [more]

MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote: You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani... [more]

Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote: Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote: The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ... [more]

Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote: I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t... [more]

White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote: It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment.... [more]

Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Yes, Dan.... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS