«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Why Didn't Libby's Defense Team Focus on Cheney?
Sorry to be so monotonous, but the holiday week has left people with an absence of news and a lot of time to speculate on all things Libby. So here's some more worthwhile block quoting. Did Libby's defense team threaten to expose Dick Cheney's crimes during the trial? And did they only back off after being guaranteed a commutation or pardon? Follow the clues, it makes a lot of sense...
If you ask any criminal defense attorney, they said we would make Dick Cheney the focus of the trial. He is perfect. He’s all over this case. It really was an investigation about what Dick Cheney ordered, what Dick Cheney said, what Dick Cheney did. It’s just that Dick Cheney wasn’t indicted.
So no one was that surprised when the defense team made it clear they were going to call him to the trial and they were going to take the gloves off. And then suddenly, it changed and they said they were not going to call him.
They barely talked about him in any sinister way. And they adopted what could only be described as a passive defense. They virtually walked Libby into a conviction. I don’t mean to be too harsh, but it seemed to me a pretty passive performance.
Well some of us speculated at the time that it seemed to be preserving the chance for a pardon. He was a loyal soldier. He took the hit in court and he remained quiet even after his conviction and even after his sentencing.
Crooks and Liars has video.
Comments
While this is certainly an easy thing to imagine happening, particularly from this White House it would be an amazingly difficult thing to prove or even come close to proving unless they were dumb enough to write it down and then leave it laying around somewhere for someone to find. (Though this is not that hard to imagine with this White House either).
The more interesting question to me is: What if they did just what you said? Would it be against the law? Libby does not have to call anyone. Not putting up a defense is not against the law. Bush can pardon anyone he wants for any reason. It would not even have had to been stated and certainly not written down. A simple "dont worry about it" with the right kind of look on your face and 'nuff said.
It is certainly slimy but is it against the law?
Posted by: Brian K on 07/06/07 at 9:42 AM Respond
No, it isn't against the law...if you are above the law; these people have smeared it in your face..time and time again!
Posted by: Clarence D. Smart on 07/06/07 at 7:05 PM Respond
thanks
Posted by: cilt bakımı on 02/13/08 at 12:48 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Why Didn't Libby's Defense Team Focus on Cheney? (3)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
Mike Gravel the "Avant Garde of the New Artpolitical Era"? (3)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
National Monument Saved From 4x4 Enthusiasts (4)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
NSA Warrantless Wiretapping Case Dismissed (2)
cilt bakımı wrote:
thanks...
[more]
Ron Paul Rallies the Troops; What's His Next Move? (21)
gravel kucinich paul nader wrote:
barack obama mike huckabee vs machine
huckabee obama:
we ...
[more]
Barack Obama's Messiah Complex (14)
Me wrote:
" I am sick of Obama's "message of hope"... Does anyone re...
[more]
The Continued Absurdity of the Missing White House Emails Case (1)
Ron Matuska wrote:
Right after WWII, the U.S. executed Japanese who had water...
[more]
Clinton to Obama: Yes We Can (2)
CW4Barak wrote:
Poor Hillariously Rotten Clinton...no matter what you do, ...
[more]
The John Edwards Endorsement: A Last Chance To Prove He's No Phony (75)
capt wrote:
"there is a 64 page Blueprint for Change on his website."
...
[more]
REALLY Bad News Day for Hillary Clinton (75)
ghart wrote:
i love you dagney taggart...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity