« Goodbye Chuck Hagel. You'll be Missed | Blog Index | News of the Weird »
Dispatch from the Society of Environmental Journalists Conference
At this weekend's conference of environmental journalists in Palo Alto, the AP's science writer, Seth Borenstein, moderated a plenary session called "Covering Climate Change." A day before the event, he received an email from Marc Morano, a senior aid to Senator James Inhofe (R-Ok.)—the former head of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and an adamant climate change denier—urging him to question the panel's seeming assumption that scientists had concluded that climate change was a reality. Borenstein promptly forwarded the email to several other journalists.
Contrary to popular opinion (and Mother Jones' careful reporting), Morano wrote, scientists who challenge the climate change hypothesis are not a well-funded minority, but individuals whose research has held its own scientifically despite the PR victory of well-funded liberal fear-mongers.
You've gotta give it to Inhofe, whose major funders list reads like a who's who of energy and forest products corporations—he's really stuck to his guns.
But, back in reality, the experts at the conference indicated time and again that global warming was already hard upon us and that we need to act now to cap carbon emissions unless we want things to get really ugly. We also need to start planning for the consequences of climate change (the buzzword is "adaptation.") Phillip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, said "there has been no thought given to this issue" in the United States, despite the fact that by 2050, 100 million people a year could be displaced by weather disasters—and research suggests that among the hardest-hit countries will be Mexico, making our current immigration problems look like child's play.
Posted by Cameron Scott on 09/08/07 at 7:58 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
ARCHIVE
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Dobson Slams Fred Thompson in Private Email (2)
"Goober" wrote:
No Jon, that leaves RON PAUL.
Dobson has a big mouth, like...
[more]
Burma: Saffron Flames Rage Against the Machine (1)
gvc wrote:
["Too bad the US' foreign policies in Asia are not consist...
[more]
Republicans Can't Find the Cash to Campaign (2)
gvc wrote:
Jonathan, I don't think all the necessary information is t...
[more]
U.S. Always Outsourcing, More Contractors Than U.S. Troops in Iraq (8)
gvc wrote:
I thought the actual details of this had already been poin...
[more]
College Students: You've Been F#%'D! (7)
gvc wrote:
I've read quite a bit of Ursula K, but to be honest, I alw...
[more]
Secretary of Defense to Ask for $180 Billion for Iraq, Afghanistan Wars (4)
Mildred wrote:
Vote third party. Vote green. ...
[more]
Nixon Hated the Jews: Even More Evidence (2)
Ira wrote:
Who cares. The Jews hate Christians and Muslims. Just read...
[more]
Sunni Insurgents Launch Assassination Campaign (3)
youtoob wrote:
bookworm, that didn't even make sense!...
[more]
"Stop Hillary Clinton" Now the Largest Political Facebook Group (18)
Stephen Fox wrote:
After everything is said and done in this election, a few ...
[more]
Hilarious Website of the Week: Cops Bitching About Other Cops (5)
JT Barrie wrote:
The problem is that police know how ridiculous their own...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


IPCC is forecasting a billion climate refugees by 2050. Does anyone really believe that our world economy can absorb that and continue as it has been? Does anyone not see that this would cause global civilizational collapse? Can anyone not guess what the world will be like if our entire infrastructure fails to hold up to this added strain?
Already, the three staple grain crops of the world are in decline year over year. World fisheries output has been declining year over year since 1983, despite improved fishing technology. A billion people currently depend on ocean fisheries for the bulk of their protein.
Our topsoil is declining. We are already seeing signs of widespread desertification. We are depleting our underground aquifers many times faster than they replenish. Farming depends on these aquifers in many regions. When the water is gone, so too will be the farms, causing further decline in food production.
The only major thing we produce that is still on the rise is babies. Humans have not yet reached peak population. And yet, we are made of food. As food declines, so will population. How could it fail to be otherwise?
That environmental considerations are going to cause us enormous problems in the very near future, seems blatantly obvious to me.
Malthus was wrong. He overestimated, rather than underestimated, the human population that this planet can sustain. He simply underestimated the degree to which the current generation would steal food and resources from future generations to feed itself.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 09/09/07 at 8:18 AM