«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
And if David Duke Could Sing Like Donnie McClurkin?
If you want to hear what Donnie McClurkin said at the Obama rally this weekend, here it is. Let's hope he's a better singer than theologian. Given the backlash, what can be the meaning of allowing him to repeat his controversial message?
I've been waiting for thoughtfully ardent gay rights activist Andrew Sullivan to weigh in on all this but he hasn't seemed very exercised about. Here's his lengthiest statement to date on the subject:
To my mind, this isn't ultimately about the difficulty of forging any kind of alliance between gays and African-Americans. It is the inherent danger of mixing religion with politics. That's called Christianism. Some of us have not spent the last few years trying to rescue conservatism from the toxin of theocracy only to support a candidate who wants to do the same thing on the left. I don't think Obama wants to go that far; I still believe that broadly speaking, his is the only major candidacy right now that offers the kind of change we need. But what happened on that stage was inexcusable, stupid, and damaging. I don't blame any gay American for jumping the Obama ship over it.
I think the salient issue is a black hyper-religiosity which gets a pass on its anti-intellectualism (even for something a-rational), hypocrisy, misogyny, and bigotry, all things we looked to Obama, the thinking person's black Protestant, to confront. There was a time, not so long ago, when he was going to show liberal Dems how to reclaim religion for the left:
But somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart. It got hijacked. Part of it's because of the so-called leaders of the Christian Right, who've been all too eager to exploit what divides us. At every opportunity, they've told evangelical Christians that Democrats disrespect their values and dislike their Church, while suggesting to the rest of the country that religious Americans care only about issues like abortion and gay marriage; school prayer and intelligent design. There was even a time when the Christian Coalition determined that its number one legislative priority was tax cuts for the rich. I don't know what Bible they're reading, but it doesn't jibe with my version.
But I'm hopeful because I think there's an awakening taking place in America. People are coming together around a simple truth - that we are all connected, that I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper. And that it's not enough to just believe this - we have to do our part to make it a reality. My faith teaches me that I can sit in church and pray all I want, but I won't be fulfilling God's will unless I go out and do the Lord's work.
Was it the Lord's work he did with McClurkin? The majority of blacks say yes, this 'jibes with their version'. Their McClurkin-translation Bibles tell them so and their beliefs may not be interrogated.
For all this groovy, transcendent talk, the fact remains that as long as a black gospel choir shares the stage, you can spew anything you want; black religiosity is the one positive stereotype America employs so as to feel better about all the negative ones in play and it may not be critiqued. Why? Because whites don't expect very much in the way of black complexity -who cares if they make sense or not? And, it's a nuisance - look how much trouble that morally wracked King-fellow caused. Obama was supposed to be different. He was supposed to help raise black and liberal consciousness but if he's going to be just as kneejerk, unreflective and hypocritical when it suits him, then religion will continue to both bedevil and enhance black life, let alone America.
Whether or not McClurkin is a reason to vote against Obama is every individual's to decide. Whether or not he's different from any other 'jack leg' preacher? The window of opportunity for distancing himself from, let alone rejecting, black religion's excess is closing fast.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Debra Dickerson on 10/30/07 at 10:54 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
" whites don't expect very much in the way of complexity " H-mm ..is this from the same group who gave us the Iraq , Panama , Grenada , Viet Nam wars ; who still obssess over OJ? Blacks are the most thoughtful people in these united states .it's whites who are the simple- minded , fawning, idiots who believe themselves superior when evidence to the contrary abound ! whites who imagine we are the best this and that as things fall apart . Blacks do not run this nation nor it's institutions. Whites who favor things over people . white thought is considered the standard . what the minister stated is simply a belief shared by many .why is he castigated for giving his opinion ? why can you not say i disagre with what you say but I have a different opinion.Why is what he said confused with science which has made no definitive assertion on the subject ?
Posted by: edmond on 10/30/07 at 12:33 PM Respond
Obama is nobody's house Negro. He does not have to explain nor apologize. If the Gays don't like it too bad. Just remember, without the Black vote, you will get another 8 years of Jeb Bush.
Posted by: Pastor Leroy Jones on 10/30/07 at 2:21 PM Respond
Sorry, you cant please everyone, the idea that Obama is suppose to champion the gay cause because he is black and liberal is just as bad as black people voting for him because he is black.
The gays dont like it, vote for some one else. And what is the writers beef with the black church. Their views are no different or single mined as the white ones. She disparges the church's every step than turns around and ask that they do more. There is a trend going on attacking the black church and blaming it for being close minded. This from the people who abandon the church because they did not like the rules and than wonder why there is HIV, attacks against women, unwed mothers and so on. Guess what Mr. and Ms. "spiritual the churches rules are what prevented the spread of these illness in the black community. You dont like the chuch you can find some where else to worship too.
Posted by: Mike on 10/30/07 at 8:45 PM Respond
How on earth would supporting equal rights for ALL CITIZENS - regardless of gender, race, religion, or sexual orientation/identity - make Obama a "house Negro"?
Posted by: kelly g. on 10/30/07 at 8:48 PM Respond
kelly g, a gay man is a "double minded" man, it is a condition that we pray for deliverance from. Many have been healed. Praise the Lord. We love the sinner, just not the sin. I use to be married to old man Whisky, but praise the Lord, I got deliverance.
Posted by: Pastor Leroy Jones on 10/31/07 at 7:38 AM Respond
I don't know what "Christianism" is, but homosexuality is the exact same thing as Anton Lavey's Satanism.
Posted by: Henry the Horse on 11/05/07 at 5:28 PM Respond
Dedbra, sorry your post so far has only collected the comments of a few ignorant homophobes. For the record, sexuality aside, I think your points here are valuable. Is Obama going to follow the black mainstream and pander to religiously inspired bigotry or follow the higher path of fairness that past black leaders truly understood because they were living out a reality of inequality that no amount of juiced up rappers on MTV could sweeten with pretty ladies, drugs and gold chains?
Posted by: Paul Miller on 11/05/07 at 8:47 PM Respond
Paul, be thankful we don't live under the Communists. It's disappointing to see Che Guevara glorified on the college campuses. The man was a Marxist-Leninist of the worst kind: He presided over the Cuban Revolution's first firing squads; he assisted in the persecution of homosexuals, herded into buses and trucks, the 'unfit' would be transported at gunpoint into concentration camps organized on the Guanahacabibes mold.
Posted by: Wilbur W. on 11/06/07 at 8:24 AM Respond
From where I sit, Obama did not personally make any statements that could be construed as offensive to homosexuals, Donnie McClurkin did.
The article assumes that Obama supports Mr. McClurkin's statements because Mr. McClurkin made these statements at an event that surports Obama.
For homosexuals to desert Obama enmasse because of the statements of one Obama surporter is frankly, kneejerk.
Homosexuals, if need be, should direct their wrath at McCurkin, not Obama.
Posted by: Selah Eric Spruiell on 12/06/07 at 1:03 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
And if David Duke Could Sing Like Donnie McClurkin? (9)
Selah Eric Spruiell wrote:
From where I sit, Obama did not personally make any statem...
[more]
Romney to Atheists: Drop Dead (2)
slanted tom wrote:
Who but a devout Mormon will vote for this man?...
[more]
Mitt Romney's Big Speech: Love all Religions (Except Islam) (7)
Norman wrote:
Would it be good for our country to have a man in the Whit...
[more]
Iowans Rail Against Illegal Immigrants They Rarely See (1)
Norman wrote:
Americans need educated on this immigration thing.
It is n...
[more]
Congress to Force Middle Class to Finance Hedge Fund Managers' Tax Break (3)
Norman wrote:
There is no reason why anyone should be sweating this AMT
...
[more]
Can Fringe Anti-Mormon Fundamentalists Bring Down Romney? (8)
doug wrote:
Part III:
3. "If not, will you at this time renounce Morm...
[more]
Huckabee: God Responsible for My Rise in Polls (15)
pablo wrote:
why bother counting votes at all? Hold a prayer meeting an...
[more]
Crazy As They Need To Be: Circumcised Women Who Support The Practice (51)
Paul Miller wrote:
Nicole, are you saying the negatives are all smoke and mir...
[more]
Supersize Coup—Morgan Spurlock Finds Osama? (1)
jkp wrote:
Since it's just a rumor, and not something advertised in h...
[more]
Bush and the Iran NIE: Don't Ask, Don't Tell (15)
Roozbeh wrote:
I am from Iran and I can't express how happy I am that thi...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity