«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Iowa Caucus Sees Record Turnout for Dems
I wrote this week that the Iowa caucuses were a 120/135/150 game. If 120,000 people showed up, it would be heavy on Edwards' hardcore supports. If it was closer to 135,000, you'd have the hardcore plus Clinton's older voters. And if it was 150,000 or more, Obama got the youth vote out.
The Iowa Democratic Party just released this one-line email:
"With 93.5 percent of the precincts reporting we are seeing record turnout with 218,000 caucus attendees."
By now you probably know that Obama won Iowa, and won big. He may have won amongst the old, the white, the female—he may have won on other people's turf tonight. We'll find out soon. But what we do know is that he dominated on his turf. The Des Moines Register gets it right again.
Update: New email. "With 96 percent of the precincts reporting we are seeing record turnout with 227,000 caucus attendees." This may be a whole new paradigm...
Update Update: Another email. "With 100 percent of the precincts reporting we are seeing record turnout with 239,000 caucus attendees." I'm going with, yes, new paradigm. Turnout in 2004 was 125,000. For the record, this turnout isn't all Obama: an exceptionally strong set of Democratic candidates is creating enthusiasm across the board. So says Howard Dean: "Record turnout for Democrats—nearly twice as many people participated in the Democratic caucus as in the Republican caucus—shows that voters are excited about our candidates and that our Party is strong."
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 01/03/08 at 7:00 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
A snapshot analysis that each and every Dem caucus aspirant received at least 50% more votes than Huckabee is an enormous story.
Money is now going to flow to Dem coffers probably at the rate of five to one. The consequences for Congressional races are huge.
I suspect that the reason the MSM is not ballyhooing this voter disparity story is because they know that if they get behind the story and really trumpet it's likely effects those effects will increase geometrically from the added publicity.
If the same trend repeats itself in NH with no corresponding organized evangelical vote as in IOWA the stats may favor the Dems even more.
Some days are better than others. (Psst, tell the Press.)
Posted by: cognitorex on 01/04/08 at 9:56 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Hillary Clinton Tosses the Script (6)
Frank Sirk wrote:
I agree that Obama is the "empty suit" and simply spouts, ...
[more]
In New Hampshire, Hillary Finds It Tough To Dash Obama's Hope (29)
Shawn wrote:
Ummmm...what poll are you reading Ames? As of Sunday, the...
[more]
Dem Debate in NH Previews Clinton's Get-Obama Strategy (22)
Dr.Q wrote:
obamas new strategy. Present himself at an Arsenio Hall sh...
[more]
Obama's New Hampshire Ads — Preview of National Race? Cause for Concern? (7)
Liberal Larry wrote:
In 2012, the Democratic Party will be split in two when Ba...
[more]
McCain in NH: Would Be "Fine" To Keep Troops in Iraq for "A Hundred Years" (52)
Dr.Q wrote:
I am begining to understand the goverment. take for exampl...
[more]
Breaking: Obama Wins Iowa. Clinton and Edwards Tied for 2nd. Ron Paul Kicking Rudy's Ass (3)
tremayne wrote:
I found world reaction to Obama's win most interesting. It...
[more]
Maureen Dowd and Hillary's Familiar Fists of Fury (1)
Mo MoDo wrote:
It's easy. Dowd hates the Clintons but looooves her some O...
[more]
How Obama Won, and What it Means for the Democratic Race (65)
Duky wrote:
And, I say again. If Obama sweeps the nation he will do i...
[more]
Edwards Tips Hat to Obama in Concession Speech (6)
elizabeth phelps wrote:
what John Edwards need to work on that we have been workin...
[more]
Clinton, Edwards Campaigns Go Negative on Obama (8)
zadie17 wrote:
Obama has not run a "squeaky clean campaign." Check out Fa...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
Primary Sources: The WWII Ration Book
Record Opium Crop Funding Resurgent Taliban
Adelson Questioned by Israeli Detectives As Part of Olmert Bribery Probe
McCain Confuses Voters (and Himself?) on Spending Cuts
Brent Scowcroft on the Cuba Embargo: "It Doesn't Do Anything"
Which Dictators Are Too Awful?
Obama Goes General
Clinton Campaign Keeps On Pushing Bogus Rationale
More on McCain's Climate Change Speech Today