MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Vote Totals vs. Recent Polling: Who Exceeded Expectations on Feb 5?

In an effort to see which Democratic candidate exceeded expectations on Super Tuesday, I grabbed the most recent polling numbers from pollster.com and actual vote totals from the New York Times. The result is this chart, which shows that the percentage of the vote that Obama actually received exceeded the percentage of the vote polling said he would receive in every state except Illinois (where expectations for BHO were in the stratosphere). In some instances, Obama shattered expectations: he did 11.8 percent better that polling suggested in Alabama, 8.5 percent better in Connecticut, 15 percent better in Georgia, and 12 percent better in Oklahoma.

But Clinton did better as well, which means that some portion of both candidates' gains can be attributed to voters who told pollsters there were undecided but chose a candidate on election day. Clinton picked up slightly fewer of these voters, and in three states, underperformed by a moderate amount.

polls-vs-results-feb5.gif

On average, Obama beat the polls by 6.5 percent and Clinton beat them by 2.4 percent. States that had insufficient polling were not included on this chart. Those states include one that went for Clinton (Arkansas), four that went for Obama (Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, and Kansas), and one that is still undecided (New Mexico).






Comments

Mr. Stein, of course Obama beat expectations by a higher margin - his expectations were lower than Clinton's. It's called Do The Math. By the way, your blatant bias towards Obama is fast approaching idoletry. I thought Mother Jones was supposed to be objective. I was an adult during the Clinton years - not still in junior high, like most of Obama's supporters - so I know those years were pretty good. And I think you would be hard pressed to disagree. So tell me again, why do so many people, including you Mr. Stein, hate Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: John Wolforth on 02/06/08 at 1:51 PM  Respond

idolatry

Posted by: capt on 02/06/08 at 3:26 PM  Respond

capt.....Mr. Wolforth is right. I look to MJ to be objective and they are definitely in Obama's camp. Oh, and by the way, can you spell meanspirited?

Posted by: silverlucie on 02/06/08 at 3:54 PM  Respond

Jeeze, I correct one word and I am both wrong and meanspirited?


BTW - yes it is mean-spirited or mean spirited. Not one word.

If you don't like what you read nothing wrong with saying so. That doesn't make me wrong for the correction.

So, if you are serious, please explain how a one word correction means I think someone else is wrong or right, or could it be you are reading a bit too much into a one word correction?


Posted by: capt on 02/06/08 at 4:06 PM  Respond

Remember Edwards, everybody's favorite populist, talking about how America can't afford to replace corporate Republicans with "corporate Democrats"? Who do you think he was referring to, community organizer Barack or Wal-Mart boardmember Hillary?Take your blinders off, the party of the middle class is being hjacked by the corporatists! MoJo isn't all that biased, but neither is it all that stupid!

Posted by: AR on 02/06/08 at 4:21 PM  Respond

Thank you silverlucie. Hey capt, as for idolatry, if you Google the word (I'm such a corporate stooge), you'll find it spelled both ways. And why can't you admit that your correction was an attempt by you to belittle my intelligense? Oh, sorry, that's intelligence. One more thing, it's Jeez, not jeeze.

Posted by: John Wolforth on 02/07/08 at 6:52 AM  Respond

"And why can't you admit that your correction was an attempt by you to belittle my intelligense"

???

If correcting one word is seen as an attempt at anything other than a one word correction - so be it!

Misspell away - I will not bother to offer any corrections in the future.

No attempt at anything was implied.

Thanks

Posted by: capt on 02/07/08 at 8:05 AM  Respond

For quick reference try m-w-dot-com

There is no alternative spelling for idolatry.

Using google to check spelling is not a viable reference. The fact that others might misspell the word is not support of the misspelling.

FWIW

Posted by: capt on 02/07/08 at 8:13 AM  Respond

Capt; People are too sensitive, sometimes we are just typing too fast. If I misspell a word, tell me. I will appreciate it.

Posted by: MSO on 02/07/08 at 8:15 AM  Respond

MSO,

Thanks, and correct me too. We all miss here and there. I ALWAYS miss the most simple two letter words that pass spell check like - of for if - in for is - and others.

I can never proof myself worth a darn.

Corrections are never intended as a "better than thou"

Posted by: capt on 02/07/08 at 11:34 AM  Respond

How does a chart with accurate facts and figures, presented accurately, constitute "idolatry"?

I was a Mathlete, and we kind of thought of it as, you know, science.

Reality is biased towards Obama at the moment, y'all. And yes, Mr. Wolforth - his supporters include the better spellers. Meow!

Posted by: Rachel on 02/11/08 at 11:49 PM  Respond

Capt; People are too sensitive, sometimes we are just typing too fast. If I misspell a word, tell me. I will appreciate it.

Better speller - NOT!

I am a terrible speller. I have to spell check everything and I had to look up the word in question.

Not to mention the fast typing thing.

It is just NBD

Posted by: capt on 02/13/08 at 8:47 AM  Respond

thanked post

thanked post

good!!

Posted by: Amway on 06/02/08 at 5:02 AM  Respond

thanked post

thanked

thanked post

oooo tnks

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Vote Totals vs. Recent Polling: Who Exceeded Expectations on Feb 5? (20)
Oto Kiralama wrote: oooo tnks... [more]

Bush's Newest Secret: Who's Funding His Library? (32)
Credit Cards Australia wrote: Compare credit cards with Australia’s leading financial co... [more]

Justice Scalia Wants You to Have Every Opportunity to Off Yourself (43)
kleyton cooper wrote: Whoops! sorry Dan, I misspelled your last name. But then ... [more]

The Yoo-Sands Controversy (3)
FOIA Gras wrote: Perhaps we should all call Rep. King's office and ask him ... [more]

Credit Card Industry Kicks Consumers Off Congressional Panel (46)
Bank Accounts Australia wrote: Compare leading bank accounts with Australia’s leading fin... [more]

Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery (3)
Boris wrote: Well,it was a "lone nut". What else it could have been? Yo... [more]

MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? Talk About It With the Experts (150)
oneoldman wrote: After reading all the posts here I realise there can be no... [more]

In a Speech on Patriotism, Obama Tries To Get Past the '60s (20)
ricko wrote: obama is a figment of your imagination...a fairy tale...he... [more]

McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy (5)
kathy Giannini wrote: Does Obama admit to stating that he had been to all "57" s... [more]

Supreme Court Overturns DC Handgun Ban (107)
No Police-State, Thanks wrote: Sensible: I just had to say it: But the Constitution IS t... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS