MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL
July 9, 2008

«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»

Dems Poised to Force Contempt Vote—Really

House Democrats are poised to push a vote to hold White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers in contempt of Congress. Sound familiar? If so, that's because congressional Dems have been vowing to hold Bolten and Miers to account since last July, when the pair blew off subpoenas compelling them to testify before Congress in connection with the U.S. Attorneys scandal. More than six months later, we're still waiting for the Dems' promised constitutional showdown with the White House.

In late July, the day after the House Judiciary Committee voted to authorize contempt citations against Bolten and Miers, Roll Call reported that the Democrats, citing "the busy House schedule," would hold off on advancing the measure until after the August recess. After House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers offered a "final warning" to the White House in early November, a vote was briefly scheduled for the middle of that month, then quickly postponed until December. Sure enough, December came and went with no House contempt vote (though, the Senate Judiciary Committee finally got around to voting on and approving contempt citations for Bolten and Karl Rove). In January, with contempt supposedly at the top of their agenda, the Democratic leadership again put off dealing with the politically thorny issue, citing their need to hammer out an economic stimulus package with the administration.

That brings us to today, when a number of news outlets are reporting that the House could vote on the contempt citations as early as tomorrow. This afternoon, Conyers introduced two resolutions related to the contempt proceedings, one of which would allow the Judiciary Committee to file suit in federal court if Attorney General Michael Mukasey refuses to enforce contempt charges, as he has already threatened to do. So perhaps the Democrats are moving forward on contempt charges after all. That said, don't be terribly surprised if there's a last minute delay—or if the looming brouhaha with the White House ends without the Dems delivering the hoped for blow to the administration's expansion of executive power.






Comments

Letters and 'Resolutions', sheez! How about frog-marching those clowns to the slammer!

The Dems only weapon seems to be the paper cuts people get from scary letters.

Posted by: Ya Know... on 02/13/08 at 10:41 PM  Respond

They are much too busy with matters of real importance to the welfare of our great (er... once great) nation and our constitutional government; baseball and steroids!

Posted by: DaveD on 02/14/08 at 4:51 AM  Respond

This is the one thing about the new (semi-dem) Congress that really disgusts me. Bush continues to make signing statements that violate the constitution, and his lackeys continue to lie through their teeth, and Congress sits by and takes. Clinton lied about a BJ, which wasn't anyone's business anyway, and the Republicans were all over him. Bush has practically set the constitution on fire and is about to pee on its chard remains, and nothing happens. What the hell is going on here?

Posted by: Michael Z on 02/14/08 at 8:49 AM  Respond

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

Dems Poised to Force Contempt Vote—Really (4)
Michael Z wrote: This is the one thing about the new (semi-dem) Congress th... [more]

The John Edwards Endorsement: A Last Chance To Prove He's No Phony (99)
Michael Z wrote: I as a former Edwards supporter now strongly support Obama... [more]

Huckabee is Officially Done (8)
Dr Zaius wrote: Good point, Gary. What if Huck gets Romney's delegates? Wh... [more]

Clinton to Obama: Yes We Can (11)
capt wrote: "if you guys HAD to" A very hard question - I'd close my... [more]

Huckabee Goes Nuclear on WA State GOP (12)
dennis lee wrote: First off he is correct in saying something fishy is happe... [more]

Ron Paul Rallies the Troops; What's His Next Move? (27)
capt wrote: The Newsletters: Since at least 1978, Ron Paul has attac... [more]

Coalition Of The Dwindling—Australia Is Leaving; Who's Left? (3)
Hilário Godinho wrote: SOS Portugal SOS.--- Eu Peço Ajuda.--- Para Publicar Por F... [more]

The Three Trillion Dollar War (3)
Jack Houston wrote: What is our objective in Iraq that is worth the cost at ho... [more]

What Would You Ask Senator Obama? (25)
Richard Conner wrote: Senator Obama: You proudly say you voted against interven... [more]

Putin to Ukraine: We'll Sell You Natural Gas, But Might Nuke You, Too (1)
Ya Know... wrote: Reagans legacy destroyed by a fellow Republican. The Horr... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS