MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Home Sour Home

News: What happens when a Republican homemaker goes up against an elusive construction company, a faceless bureaucracy, and the whole housing-industrial complex?

July/August 2005 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

CONVERSION EXPERIENCES generally begin with a quest, and for Bob and Jordan Fogal, it began with a quest for comfort. Bob, who works in marketing, wanted a shorter commute to his office. Matters of the home, as usual, were left to his wife, and Jordan had spent months looking for a house—and had rejected many—when at last she found the one: a regal, stucco box in a gated community near downtown Houston. "You could see what a quality piece of work the house was," Jordan remembers. She liked the 20-foot ceilings, the granite counters in the kitchen, the stainless-steel appliances—all part of the "Tremont Attention to Detail Difference," according to the builders' handout. She assumed that since the house was so nicely appointed, it was also soundly built. Seduced by beauty, certain of value, the Fogals bought the home in April 2002 for $368,564, investing nearly everything they had.

The first disappointment came on the day they moved in. Bob Fogal, weary from unpacking, trudged upstairs to relax in his new whirlpool bath. When he got out, he pulled the plug and "all 100 gallons of that water came down through the dining room ceiling, into the light fixtures, down the columns, onto my dining room table and Oriental rugs," Jordan recalls. "And I just started screaming."

The Fogals tried to tell themselves it was just an oversight—one unconnected drain—but then more oversights appeared: a portion of yard that turned into a swamp; a section of house that visibly sagged; heating that wasn't warm enough; a cooling system not cold enough. And always, and most seriously, water coming in from somewhere. Sitting at breakfast, thanks to a window above them that had been installed upside down, the couple sometimes felt the falling rain.

It was all too much for Bob to think about. He continued going to work while Jordan stayed home, appreciating the "Attention to Detail Difference." Eventually, Bob too would join Jordan before the Houston City Council to lament the mold and the rotting and how, according to the meeting's minutes, "the builder knew of the problems and failed to disclose it." Jordan had looked forward to a leisurely life taking care of her new house and writing memoirs, but when the builders would not fix the structure, and when no authority would compel them to do it, Jordan experienced, for the first time, an in-justice she could not endure. On a street corner near her house, the 59-year-old Republican began picketing for all she was worth.

"I mean, it's a rat's nest," she says of the house, of Texas law, of the System,"and here I am, one grandmother with no money and no help."


IT WAS A MISMATCH from the start—one mad-as-hell housewife against the entire construction-industrial complex. Home-building is a chief indicator of the economy's health, and politicians are rarely inclined to slow it down with regulation or oversight. Reinforcing that impulse is an extremely well-funded, organized builder lobby whose focus, according to Janet Ahmad of the watchdog group HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB), has never been "on how to build a house correctly, but on how to limit regulations and liability."

As a result, contractors throughout the country have been able to feed the U.S. housing boom with little fear of being held accountable for the quality of their work. The faster a house is constructed, the greater the profit, and thus many homes are now built as though on an assembly line, often in as little as 90 days. Contractors "build them spacious and grandiose and give them the appearance of quality," says Ahmad, whose group tracks both federal and state regulations. Behind the facade, though, are often shoddy workmanship and cheap materials, such as "wood" trim that is actually recycled paper.

No governmental body tallies how many of these new homes prove seriously defective, but Consumer Reports, in a broad investigation of construction defects in 2004, estimated that some 150,000 homeowners a year find "they have more consumer protections for a fickle $20 toaster" than for the biggest investment of their lives.

And nowhere, homeowners' groups say, do negligent builders get a better deal than in the Fogals' home state. "If you want to be a successful fly-by-night contractor," says HOBB's Ahmad, "you come to Texas. They're pillars of the community here, on the who's who list. They don't even have to sneak away in the night. They operate in the full light of day."

In one of the country's most business-friendly states, construction is one of the most influential businesses. The largest individual contributor to Texas politicians is Bob Perry—a builder who gained national fame during last year's presidential campaign when he funded the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. The organization dispensing the most political money in the state, Texans for Lawsuit Reform, is also headed by a builder, and builders have been the main beneficiaries of a decade's worth of Texas tort reform laws—laws that, for homeowners, amount to little more than a maze of obstacles designed to obstruct the filing of lawsuits.

Most builders in Texas (and elsewhere) require homebuyers to agree to settle disputes out of court, in binding arbitration. Should a consumer, by some miracle, make it past that clause, the legislature recently passed a law that abolishes standards that a home display "workmanlike construction," confines damage awards to the cost of repairs, and establishes a commission—dominated by builders—consumers must go to before filing a claim either in court or in arbitration. This law was in large part written by the chairman of a Texas Association of Builders task force, John Krugh, whom the governor later named to sit on that very commission.

A Texas homebuyer's only real hope for recovery, then, is to raise hell. Builders know that most people don't have the stomach for that, says Ahmad, the consumer advocate. But with Jordan Fogal, she adds, "I think they bit off more than they can chew. That one woman has created an army's worth of ruckus."


BACK IN ALABAMA, where Jordan had lived until 1994 and raised her three children, she was "den mother, room mother, cookie baker—the whole nine yards." Once, she circulated a petition to get her dirt road paved, but otherwise she had lived for 59 years without public protest of any kind.

Now, in the two-bedroom apartment the Fogals fled to when mold started showing up in their leaky house, she complains that she hardly has time to do her hair, let alone get to the tanning bed. The kitchen table is an unruly heap of evidence as Jordan, maniacally smoking, tells her sprawling story. Along the way, she mentions Grandmother, who taught her there were no gray areas—"it was right, or it was wrong"—and also Granddaddy, who believed that "if it was bad, you shot it." And, over and over again, she repeats her own maxim: "I don't like people messing with my home."

Her home is one of 44 jammed onto two acres just off Houston's Waugh Drive and surrounded by a wall. The wall, the gates, the closed garage doors give the place an isolated feeling, which the builder marketed as security. But it was never perfectly clear which company built Hyde Park Crescent.

The builders operated under many names, and it seems the Fogals' house was built by two companies, Tremont Homes and Stature Construction, both of which were directed by one Jorge Casimiro and his business partner, Thomas Thibodeau. With some $28 million in revenue, Stature was listed by Hispanic Business magazine in 2001 as one of the country's largest Hispanic-owned companies. Casimiro himself has been chairman of the Houston Hispanic Chamber of Commerce's political action committee and the recipient of several business honors, which company publicity touts as proof of "his integrity and commitment to providing outstanding service."

Photo: Getty Images



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

Our builder threatens us with a lawsuit for speaking to the Building and Development in our county. We know they have no ground on the lawsuit, but they could drain us financially.
Posted by:Home OwnerJune 11, 2007 6:13:18 AMRespond ^
Thank you for attention to this bad business. I waqs just 10 seconds away from signing a new home contract with the Mandatory Arbitration clause... A point should be made. It appears that about 15% of the houses are really bad..so 85 houses are ok...but heaven help the buyers of the other 15 houses. Really big losses, not only the house, legal fees, loss of domicile, loss of money, but also all those "consequent" damages that are denied, your furnoishings, your photos, your heritage keepsakes. And most of all your self respect due you in justice. If it didn't matter, and I have asked new home builders, just remove that mandatory arbitration clause from the contract, and I will trust the American civil courts open justice. They refuse. Genevieve Lesiak Rhode Island. I almost bought new home in Florida...4 years ago. I find the same story in new home contracts from large buiders here, too. I will wait and buy from a reseller and have complete inspections done even if its a month old.
Posted by:Genevieve LesiakJune 11, 2007 6:48:54 AMRespond ^
If I could be of help in your quest for justice I would. I am in the process of fighting with Perry Homes for misrepresenting the town home I purchased (built from the ground up). I do not have the funds that Perry has or the connections in politics, but misrepresentation is mirepresentation no matter who does it. I wish you the best.
Posted by:Bobbi TemplinJune 11, 2007 7:12:55 AMRespond ^
I am a Lennar homeowner living a similar nightmare. I bought my nightmare in Commerce City colorado 1 year ago, and have just got the go ahead for mediation. Numerous water leaks, improper electrical wiring, missing support pole(22 feet unsupported home-18 feet is the max amount alloted) missing insulation, incomplete duct work, $742 water bill not paid by Lennar that I had to pay to prevent a lien against me and also stop the water from being turned off. Lennar has some serious issues as published in defectivehomes.com. Their promise to outstanding quailty and customer care is a joke. Not only should we hold homebuilders accountable, but also the city for their failed inspections. We as customers should have a voice to expose these homebuilders who have cut corners to make a profit. My Lennar Lemon should be demolished and my investment returned. Lennar has a double standard. Their executives would not accept this shoddy construction but expect us to feel safe and secure in our investment. Lennar needs to be exposed for their lack of integrity and ownership to their homeowners. Their profits are falling as is the number of home sales. With further exposure they will have to own up to their inequities and either provide the quality they promise or continue to lose the home sales resulting in declining profits.
Posted by:Carol SimmonsJune 13, 2007 7:55:19 AMRespond ^
At present my family is 5 years into litigation with our home builder TK Constructors, who build in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. I am a Realtor and that title means that I represent my clients best interest. Arbitration takes away civil rights and that is not in the best interest of anyone. All the while realizing that I am not an attorney but I wouldn't advise signing builder contracts without first taking the contract to your lawyer so that he can explain exactly what you are getting yourself into. My brother n law who is also involved is a paralyzed veteran, whos' dreams have also been shattered. He was supposed to build on the land also but instead of building he's funding a lawsuit. We are both heading to Washington for the press conference in July. Whatever it takes, but this is consumer abuse and must be quickly delt with and ended. Our lives are in limbo, ever since about two months after moving in we saw water entering over the sill plate and in an instant my heart sank as I knew this was very bad. My children have suffered at the hands of my builder for 5 long years and we just want it over and behind us.
Posted by:Kathy StutlerJune 25, 2007 2:55:48 PMRespond ^
I was just on a Jury where SCI was suing the roofer in the Hyde Park project (Aztec Roofing) It seemed very early in the trial that SCI was a very poor home builder. They want to blame others for not over seeing a proper project. While it appeared that all the roofing companies were sub standard, the lack of care on the part of SCI was inexcusable. Very BAD People, concerned with just more money.
Posted by:RSVJune 29, 2007 2:50:32 PMRespond ^
Sadly, the Fogals also suffered from an acute case of Republican Syndrome. RS can be recognized by a number of symptoms. Chief among these is a lack of empathy, or the inability to put oneself in another person's shoes. This leads to a lifetime of making selfish choices, often characterized by harshly punitive measures aimed at those who are "so stupid that they are getting what they deserve". Most sufferers of RS never gain awareness of their ailment until they are personally afflicted by the results of their prior choices, and votes. Put more simply, the Fogals are living in the world they voted for and now they don't like it. Ms. Fogal speaks approvingly of her racist ancestors. I'm sure she never thought that she herself would someday be in the position of a powerless minority, a victim of people with more power, privilege and money than she has.
Posted by:JRAugust 20, 2007 7:08:54 PMRespond ^
JR, You, my friend, are point on.
Posted by:CTAugust 21, 2007 3:24:34 PMRespond ^
We are dealing with the same situation in NC except our home was an existing home and we discovered the water intrusion problems after only two weeks of living in the house. We are now in an apartment and the mortgage company is trying to force us into foreclosure since we can't afford litigation at over $100,000 legal fees and only a 5% chance to win as per attorneys we have spoken with. It astonishes us that there are no "lemon laws" for houses. It isn't fair that our builder is still able to build by just changing his company name and was not required to carry insurance while he built our home to cover builder defects. It also isn't sure that homeowner's insurance companies can get out of paying anything in these situations, that's why we have insurance at the outragous rates they charge. It isn't fair to our children to have to live in a tiny apartment with none of their belongings because everything we own is contaminated with mold spores! There has to be a way through this without destroying our credit, where is the justice?
Posted by:AGAugust 23, 2007 4:29:16 AMRespond ^
This artical was clearly written from a political point of view. Calling her a republican, hitting Mr. Perry, calling the TRCC a builder lead group,..., it is not a balanced artical, period.
Posted by:WillAugust 23, 2007 9:20:07 AMRespond ^
well said - the horrors of an unjust society where the right to trial by jury is taken away and only the fat cats have the remaining tools- Clearly an indictment of the Republican party's un-American--justice "for sale" ways- and Texas is their playground!
Posted by:rickAugust 23, 2007 9:46:52 AMRespond ^
Shoddy Construction - Everyone Pays Except those with Sovereign Immunity What do you call 50 plus Connecticut Building Code Violations, water coming through your garage for months on end, ice 4 plus inches thick on your driveway, septic vent pipe venting into an attic, open junction boxes and getting called ignorant or threatened by Portland, CT Official? We call is Collins Hell. 8/22/07, Maya Roney wrote an article discussing the issues of shoddy construction and how this is impacting homeowners. I can speak of this issue first hand. We purchased our brand new home in September, 2003 only to find out that it was built by an unlicensed builder and the home was not inspected prior to the CO being issued. We have a brand new home that is riddled with code violations (over 50 documented Connecticut State Building Code violations) that present safety issues. The cost to fix these ticking time bombs? Over $100, 000. While we have sued the unlicensed builder and have a judgment against him – collecting is another story. We are currently suing the Town of Portland, CT as well as the Public Works Director and the Ex-Building Official (who resigned and then went to work as the Building Official in a neighboring town). We were lied to, threatened, and now the town’s employee’s are claiming sovereign immunity. So in other words, it’s ok not to do you job and put people at risk. It's ok for them not to do their jobs, but we still have to pay our sky high taxes and suck up the damages that were caused by their gross AND I MEAN GROSS NEGLIGENCE. Everything we have is documented to the letter. What did we do wrong other than expect to have the home of our dreams? We can't afford to pay for our house twice. Why do shoddy builders and shady town officials get away with this?? To learn more about our story, visit www.collinshell.com
Posted by:CollinsHellAugust 27, 2007 1:35:24 PMRespond ^
Lennar Nightmares...here are countless stories..www.huttoparke.com
Posted by:anonymousSeptember 20, 2007 6:38:44 PMRespond ^
I have first hand knowledge of this case and can tell you it is racially motivated. She reference this herself in arogant manner with her own statement, ." It's a picture of several old men—her great-uncles from Alabama. They decided that until the South rose again, they would never shave their beards. "And they were all buried with very long beards." When Ms. Fogal discovered that her builder are Jewish and Hispanic she became in raged. She then began her quest.
Posted by:Marcus SlistinoSeptember 30, 2007 7:50:00 AMRespond ^
This is what happens when the house you buy its build SCAB/Rat. Low paying job or piece work. The faster you build it, the faster you can cash your money. This is why we should support Unions and defeat Right to Work Laws. Not good for Americans
Posted by:JAMDecember 1, 2007 9:25:22 AMRespond ^
Anyone that buys a house in a developement from a mass builder is taking a big risk.If you can actually afford several hundred thousand dollars you are probably better off in the long run hiring your own architect and contractor.
Posted by:zqahttDecember 1, 2007 11:40:11 AMRespond ^
IT WAS A MISMATCH from the start—one mad-as-hell housewife against the entire construction-industrial complex. Home-building is a chief indicator of the economy's health, and politicians are rarely inclined to slow it down with regulation or oversight. Reinforcing that impulse is an extremely well-funded, organized builder lobby whose focus, according to Janet Ahmad of the watchdog group HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB), has never been "on how to build a house correctly, but on how to limit regulations and liability." Isn't this the Republican philosophy, government can't actually do anything, let the "free market" solve the problems, and the lawyers don't need to get involved, at least not on the side of regular citizens but the corporations can have and use them all they want, because their frivilous lawsuits just drive up the cost of everything.
Posted by:zqahttDecember 1, 2007 2:15:12 PMRespond ^
I was recently shopping for a condominium in the Houston area and had particular interest in the Tremont Tower, however, after reading this piece I will obviously stike it from my list possibilities. It's beyond me that these men aren't in jail. What's more baffling is why they wouldn't build a sound product in the first place and avoid all of this arbitrary headache while nurturing a continually growing positive business and constuction reputation. Is all these cutting corners and cheating really worth it? I don't know where they learned business, but it's obvios they wouldn't survive in the world of big time, international commerce with this approach. I hope they get what they deserve and I will certainly avoid any of their products in the future.
Posted by:Lauren MooreDecember 6, 2007 10:48:34 AMRespond ^
Now my builder is suing me for the bad house that he sould me look for no help from the state builder the state loves home onwers they dont love we dont pay the lobbiest my house is built by Choice Homes was a bad choice on my part
Posted by:MOJanuary 29, 2008 10:35:57 AMRespond ^
Excellent article. Any update/ How can issue be legally changed to true legal justice/?
Posted by:Genevieve LesakMarch 29, 2008 8:14:02 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2005 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS