MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Antiabortion Ambush

Antiabortion activist and self-styled

News: Is putting photos of abortion-clinic patients on the Web an invasion of privacy? Or protected free speech?

May/June 2002 Issue


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


Last summer, a patient at the Hope Clinic for Women in Granite City, Illinois, was taken to a nearby hospital after complications from an abortion. Clinic staff tried to duck the half-dozen or so antiabortion activists assembled outside, but as they wheeled the patient to a waiting minivan, protester Daniel Michael called out to his wife, "They botched one!" and then rushed to take the woman's picture. Days later, a clinic staffer was shocked to discover that the woman's medical records and photo had been posted on a Web site called Missionaries to the Unborn.

Posting photos of women entering and exiting clinics is the radical antiabortion movement's latest step in an increasingly sophisticated campaign to use the Internet to target abortion clinics. "For a long time, the focus was on putting up information on doctors and personnel, but now we're seeing patient information, too," said William Lutz, communications director of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League. "The fringe and extremist antichoice groups and individuals are always pushing the envelope legally."

Antiabortion activists embraced the tactic last spring after a federal appeals court ruled that Neal Horsley's notorious Nuremberg Files Web site-which lists the names and addresses of abortion providers and shows their names crossed off after they have been killed-is protected by the First Amendment. Encouraged by the finding, last April Horsley started a site called AbortionCams that posts photos of "homicidal mothers" gathered from "photojournalists" who lurk outside clinics, taking photos of patients. Two months after AbortionCams debuted, the Missionaries to the Unborn site featured the Illinois patient's photo and medical records.

The Hope Clinic and its patient have now filed an invasion of privacy suit against the Michaels and the Web site's owner. But although an Illinois circuit court ordered that the site remove the photo and records until the case is decided, photos of dozens of other patients taken outside clinics in 23 states remain posted on AbortionCams.

The Illinois case is the first time these tactics have been challenged in court. Legal experts agree that posting the woman's medical records-copies of which were leaked to the Michaels from an anonymous source-falls within the established definition of invasion of privacy. But the use of the photo will be a much tougher call; in order for a court to rule that revealing personal information is an invasion of privacy, a plaintiff has to show that someone of ordinary sensibilities would be offended by the revelation. "Unfortunately, there is no current privacy law that specifically prohibits all of this," said Anita Allen, a visiting professor of law at Yale Law School who specializes in privacy issues.

Pro-choice groups such as the National Abortion Federation say they are watching the situation closely. Meanwhile, Horsley continues to expand AbortionCams: He has been adding photos from new clinics almost weekly and has announced a plan to create a cable television show using video footage from clinics.

He's also looking for more volunteers to help him. "Get out there to your local butchertorium with your zoom lenses and get those cameras rolling," he writes on his site. "Point and click."



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

I don't feel you have a right to invade someone's privacy even though you don't agree. I am very much pro-life, but slamming people like that is not the way. I also feel very strongly that if a woman is raped, she should have the right to make her decision whether to keep that child or not. Her body has been invaded and she reserves that right. Of course, a woman can't expect a man to understand that. This is not cut and dried, there has to be some exceptions. I have also debated about afflicted children. It is that person's right. That would be a difficult decision, but I think it should be left up to the individual. If you bring a child into this world, you are responsible for the rearing of that child. Have we all become so self-righteous, we intimidate people and have become so cruel in our thinking. Have we lost all our compassion for people. Taking a life is not right, but I do believe there are exceptions, and a person has to work that out within themselves.
Posted by:MarthaJune 11, 2007 2:09:07 PMRespond ^
Abortion is WRONG
Posted by:SammieSeptember 6, 2007 6:19:05 AMRespond ^
[deleted] you martha.
Posted by:CodySeptember 25, 2007 7:42:52 AMRespond ^
me my self tried to have an abortin i was emotionall forced by the father of my child to have 1 done i agree to sign the papers but when it finally came down i was terrified and put uner presssure by the staff as it was paid for maybe they felt the pressure to take my money and made me have the first dillation and come to realise that this nit what iwanted done so i decied to have pins thta thjey use take outit was only for ten minutes had them in while they took them out they told me im going to have amisscarriage iwas so terrified i just wanted to leave the clinic and rushed my self to the hospital. when i arrived they told me that the child was to small to survive so in the end ended uo giving birth a still born child up until today i regret going to that clinic in the first plave. i attended my childs funeral all i could i was sorry and up untill today iregret it i will never ever go to one of the clinics again regardless of the circumstnces.
Posted by:shantell williamsSeptember 26, 2007 4:13:44 PMRespond ^
that is a bunch of bologna!! lol
Posted by:Christina BohrerOctober 2, 2007 6:54:20 AMRespond ^
im a lil wormlet
Posted by:Alyssa StreckerOctober 2, 2007 6:55:22 AMRespond ^
its still not fair to the unborn child...this fetus had no say...it is still a living thing....it is just not right to kill an unborn baby eventhough it is not yet born!!
Posted by:anonymosOctober 16, 2007 2:20:05 PMRespond ^
i understand that a women has all the rights to go through an abortion but i think that it is still wrong to infanticicde a fetus... it is just cruel to do that. how can any body even thnk about murdering an unborn fetus.it is not the baby's fault that it is now existing. that baby had no say that if it wanted to be born or not. when a mother and a chid is combined they are supose to work together and the mother should not always make decisions for both...that baby is an existing life. it deserves to be brought into the world like it was destined to, and not to killed before it even had a chance to experience life for itself!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by:dont worry about itOctober 17, 2007 2:20:44 PMRespond ^
abortion is just not RIGHT!!!!! THINK OF THE UNBORN BABY AND ITS FEELINGS...IT STILL HAS A BRAIN AND A LIFE!!!!
Posted by:BABY LOVEROctober 19, 2007 7:04:51 AMRespond ^
God knew us before we were in the womb. Children are needlessly dying, how is this legal? God has called me to help. I believe that you have every right to envade privacy. If the woman has no shame to kill, call her out on that. If she is rapped why is it ok for her to commit another hidious crime, murder. Having an abortion is only going to worsen the pain. God loves us all, he always has, even before we were in the womb.
Posted by:shandiJanuary 17, 2008 11:26:07 AMRespond ^
Showing the Teen and Women on the sugical table with the Legs in the stirrups photos or video.
LS.
Posted by:LS.March 5, 2008 11:39:27 PMRespond ^
These are just "some" reasons/methods why abortion should not be allowed

The most popular method of abortion is the suction method, this is used during the first three months of the baby’s development, and this is where they take a tube connected to a suction device, they put it in the mother’s womb and the powerful suction tears the bay’s body into pieces. Another method is the D and C method this is also used in the first three months of life. In this method they take a knife and scrape the womb to cut the attachment of the baby to the mother, the babies body is then cut into pieces and the head crushed so that it can fit through the opening of the womb. The D and E method is used during 3 and 5 months, a pair of forceps is inserted into the womb where they dismember the baby’s body and taken out through the birth canal, the body is then reassembled to make sure that everything was gotten out. Another way is through salt poisoning, a salt solution is injected into the amniotic sac where it is inhaled and swallowed by the baby, this causes a slow painful death caused by hemorrhaging, shock and burning of the skin. There are two more types of Abortion that are performed in the last three months. The first is when the baby is brought into the world using a cesarean section, the baby is removed form the womb and set aside to die from neglect. The other is when the child is born naturally on time, the only difference is that he is born feet first and when it comes time for the head to come out they make a hole in the base of the head and use a suction device to take the brain out.

Posted by:Racegirl44March 17, 2008 4:05:05 PMRespond ^
i think that was sad.well gtg
Posted by:tamra hillMarch 20, 2008 8:09:42 AMRespond ^
i think that if you are going t go somewhere to intentially kill your child you should have your face plastered on every website on the internet with murderer written across it. wether you are 1 week pregnant or 5 months pregnant. when that seed is planted its a life. and anyone anywhere at anytime that chooses to murder their child should have the whole world know about it. murder is murder and haveing an abortion makes you a murderer.if you dont like tough. its a tough world get over it. i think the internet should collect a picture of every woman that has an abortion and have their pictures plastered ALL OVER THE INTERNET!!!!!! if you disagree with me..oh well...youll get over it.
Posted by:sherryJune 2, 2008 8:15:13 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2002 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS