MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Baghdad Confidential

News: Strung-out stringers.

July 16, 2007


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


RELATED ARTICLES

Before Abdul goes to work for Reuters, his employer since late 2005, he climbs onto his roof. He does this every morning—looks right, looks left, and if there are any cars parked on his street in western Baghdad that he doesn't recognize, he waits to leave. He can't have anyone follow him, because if it's discovered that he helps foreign journalists—American journalists—he's liable to be marked as a traitor and killed.

It's happened before. In 2004, Selwan Abdelghani Medhi al-Niemi, a freelance translator for Voice of America, was murdered, along with his mother and four-year-old daughter. His wife, also a translator, received a message shortly thereafter warning that since she consorted with "infidels," her "turn will come soon, God willing." She fled the country. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 19 Iraqis working for U.S. and other foreign news outlets have been killed since the beginning of the war. Since 2004, about three times as many local reporters have been killed as the foreign reporters they assist.

As he drives to Reuters' office, Abdul (not his real name) checks and rechecks his rearview mirror and fields calls from his wife seeking reassurance that he's not being followed. He takes the risk—having given up his job as a lawyer to become a reporter—because he knows virtually no news would come out of Iraq if it weren't for him and his peers. Conditions have become so dire that Western journalists spend almost all of their time in fortified compounds near the east bank of the Tigris. Key reportorial duties—liaising with local authorities, sniffing around neighborhoods for stories, finding people to interview for "man on the street" pieces, attending Friday prayers in Sadr City—are left to local stringers, like Abdul.

This imbues him with an almost religious sense of mission. "My wife has begged me to quit my job and even to leave Iraq," Abdul says. "But I told her that every day tens of Iraqis are being killed for no reason, and they will be forgotten otherwise. To die as a journalist, I would know that I was killed while I was reporting the truth. I would die proud."

When I ask him what he can report that Western correspondents can't, he turns quiet. "Being a foreign journalist here," he finally says, "It's just like committing suicide."

That's only a slight exaggeration: Borzou Daragahi, the former Los Angeles Times Baghdad bureau chief, says he can easily count 20 times when he thought he was going to die. And every reporter who's spent time in Iraq has had close calls with ieds or insurgents. For that reason, and for financial ones, too—even a shoestring bureau costs more than $1 million a year—most news organizations have chosen to cut back or eliminate the large operations they fielded at the beginning of the war.

No official tally of reporters on the ground exists, but a head count of American print correspondents, not including wire service scribes or freelancers, caps out at around 20. McClatchy has cut its American reporting staff in half, the Boston Globe has folded its bureau altogether, the Washington Post doesn't have nearly the presence it once did (although the paper wouldn't confirm exactly how many remain), and the number of embeds—more than 200 at a high point in early 2005—was down to 48 by mid-April of this year. Edward Wong, who has covered the war since 2003 for the New York Times, describes the Western press corps in Iraq as "a skeleton crew."

The correspondents who do remain, however, blanch at being called "hotel journalists"—a term they think connotes laziness, when it takes tremendous effort just to conduct a simple interview. A Western reporter must send out a stringer to set up a meeting, then coordinate with security advisers—Centurion, one of the most popular security consultancies among news organizations, charges up to $5,000 a week per adviser—who chart out the safest routes and the risks involved. If the trip is deemed safe enough, the reporter will leave the compound escorted by bodyguards and sometimes a chase car.

The precautions don't end there. After paying $140,000 for an armored car, National Public Radio reporters dinged and scuffed it up so it would resemble the other clunkers on the road. Nancy Youssef, former Baghdad bureau chief for McClatchy, had her female translator tie their hijabs in the same fashion so they would look like sisters. Some reporters attempt to self-tan (most end up a radioactive orange) and dye their hair black (most end up with something closer to purple).

And yet, news operations still wouldn't be able to file stories if not for their local correspondents—a fact they don't seem eager to publicize. With the exception of Reuters (which Abdul speaks well of), nine of the nation's biggest news organizations either ignored my request to speak to a local reporter or told me they wouldn't put me in touch with one for security reasons—even those whose stringers' names regularly appear in print. In early May a local journalist who seemed excited to talk to me was notified by his superiors that he couldn't. I asked if he knew any other stringer who could. The next day, he wrote, "I approached a number of my friends who work for American media outlets, but unfortunately their companies follow the same policy of ours and HONESTLY I DON'T KNOW WHY." A former Iraqi reporter for a major U.S. newspaper told me that the paper's Baghdad bureau chief emailed his whole staff forbidding them to speak with me. He thinks he knows the reason: "I didn't want to say it first, but I can't hide it anymore," he wrote. "I am sick of them hiding [behind] the bravery of the Iraqi staff who go out and do the reporting while the American journalists...hide behind their compound's blast walls and then get the credit."

If the news organizations are evasive about the use of Iraqi stringers, the military is sometimes openly hostile to them, says Abdul. Whenever he approaches a spot where U.S. forces have been attacked, he says, soldiers start yelling at him and sometimes even draw their guns to prevent him from covering the scene. In 2005, U.S. soldiers shot and killed Reuters soundman Waleed Khaled while he was trying to cover the shooting of two Iraqi policemen; bullets went through his U.S. Army press badge. U.S. forces then detained and interrogated his wounded coworker, cameraman Haider Khadem, for three days due to "inconsistencies in his story." Lieutenant Colonel Barry Johnson, the head of the U.S. military's Combined Press Information Center in Baghdad, admits that he doesn't like stringers' increased role in media operations: He's suspicious of their allegiances and thinks they feed "the symbiotic relationship between violence and the media."

"In many cases, there's no way these guys could operate out there in this environment without the tacit agreement of the insurgents and terrorist groups they're covering," he told me. "They cover the violence because that's what the enemy there wants."

Abdul, for his part, won't allow himself to dwell on these obstacles for long. He endures the violence and the bullying, his wife's frantic phone calls and her pleas for a safer life, and he raises himself up onto his roof every morning because he's afraid of what would happen if he didn't. "Yes, it is hazardous to work here as a journalist," he says. "But the mounting deaths, they just encourage us not to quit. If we do, we'll lose our self-respect, and also our country."



 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

we gotta get outa there pronto now we're told that if we stay it will get worse, and if we leave it will get worse, so leaving/staying is not the issue then maybe brave men like the lawyer turned stringer may have hope they might help build their country's future
Posted by:Eleanor ListerJuly 18, 2007 3:28:32 AMRespond ^
The U.S. military presence alone in Iraq will never be able to solve the violence and chaos there. It lies within the Iraqi people directly to create real change in their country. The strength and courage of Iraqis like Abdul the laywer, is amazing and encouraging to hear. For someone like himself to take such risks for himself and his family, because he feels so strongly about getting the truth out and believes change is possible, is truly significant not to mention heroic. I pray for his and his family's safety, and his continued efforts against the terror and tragedy in his country.
Posted by:SMBJuly 18, 2007 12:19:17 PMRespond ^
Your readers might be interested in this In 1975-76 I was teaching at an International School in Iran.On Dec. 7, 1975, Kissenger, Ford and some oil executives stoppedin Tehran to see The Shea on their way back from Indonisea.Kissenger told the Shea to buy more US weapons even if he has to raise the price of oil 10 times. The oil executives said we have to get rid of Saddam in Iraq because he had nationalized Iraq's oil.I had a friend who was an executive from a drilling company and saw the geological maps of all the oil fields in Middle East, Iraq has more oil than even Saudi Arabia. The plan to take back control of Iraq's oil started in 1975. Thanks and I hope you can print this.
Posted by:Bob WojdaJuly 18, 2007 3:02:20 PMRespond ^
Bob, In March 2003 we published an extensive account of how long Neocons had their eye on Iraqi oil as an important geopolitical asset -- Bob Dreyfuss's "30-Year Itch." Here's the link: http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2003/03/ma_273_01.html Check it out.
Posted by:Jay HarrisJuly 18, 2007 3:44:10 PMRespond ^
Nice, clear piece about the realities of mainstream reporting on Iraq. What I would have liked to see a bit of is some examples and analysis of what these media, Reuters included, are putting out on Iraq from the country and from elsewhere around the world. I salute "Abdul's" real bravery, which is truly in the tradition of journalism, but I fear that Reuters's use of his material, in the context of its entire Iraq file, is not worthy of the risks he is taking or of his motivations for taking them. Reuters, like most other mainstream media, has been far too supine in its treatment of what our elected officials choose to say about their reasons for invasion and their ongoing motivations for remaining in Iraq. The media machine is wedded, welded even, to one version of the story - namely the U.S.-led version. It echoes, credulously, the absurdities that that side emits day by day. The incredible expense involved in covering Iraq, even badly, is a useful shield for media organisations in explaining their limited room for movement and deployment in the country. It is no excuse for their near total failure to question the political actors, and more importantly the political processes and structures that put them in power, for their wholesale deceptions over Iraq. Hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, and counting, deserve better. I wonder whether Abdul and his fellow stringers wouldn't do a better job taking the money from their current employers, sure why not, it's the least they deserve, while also putting out their own file based on pooled material between them edited from an Iraqi perspective. Biased? Why would it be any more biased, less "objective", than what the white boys are doing?
Posted by:Patrick ChalmersJuly 19, 2007 5:08:17 AMRespond ^
If our military are the "good guys" why are they so afraid of coverage? I do really believe that we are the "better" guys. Enough of our soldiers have kept their integrity to refrain from abusive violence but the temptation to "respond in kind" is overwhelming.
Posted by:JT BarrieJuly 19, 2007 7:32:17 AMRespond ^
eventually he will be identified and ths ended his activities. NO mission to difficult no sacrifice to great. I truly understand. there comes a time when you have to think about your family. Dr.Q
Posted by:Dr.QJuly 19, 2007 8:27:29 AMRespond ^
I now know to look for a former lawyer, who now lives in a western Bawgdad neighborhood, that will consistently climb up upon his roof everytime he needs to leave. I will know it is him after he chooses not to leave when a strange car is on the block. Sweet, if you can't get the story yourself then by all means tell the enemy who is getting the story and how to recognize them.
Posted by:sepharisJuly 20, 2007 1:17:17 PMRespond ^
This is really nice and unique piece.None sheds the light on the work of the local staff of the mainstream western media outlets.We endure all the dangers to get our offices, roam the streets for stories and get back to our offices and then the western journslists will take the credit and prizes. Moreover, their guards search us twice before we get inside the building in which our movement is restricted as we can't go the garden, living room and "their kitchen" and that we have to bring our food from our homes everyday like day laborers.( Its not a matter of food but its a matter of respect and partnership). With all that, these companies do not treat us like its western journalists, they are making use of our dire need for work and ignoring our minimum rights in all means and leveles. The only hero journalists in Iraq are the locals from local reporters to stringers to drivers and not the western journalists who are being picked up by at least four guards from the airport and driven by armored vehicles to stay in their fortified office.They do nothing only to have to their names on stories as much as they can to tell the western readers "aha here i'm reporting from iraq's streets" without minimum respect to the Iraqi staff. Thabks a lot Greg Veis for this piece and hope it will help the western readers to know who is making Iraq's stories available for them. kassakhoon@gmail.com www.baghdadkassakhoon.blogspot.com
Posted by:Baghdad KassakhoonJuly 21, 2007 12:59:37 PMRespond ^
Thanks, I never thought that getting the "atta-boy" in a time of World Involved War would be thought to be fair or unfair...In war, you do what you have to do, right?? Besides, there are always people deserving of credit, who don't get it, so that their cause or the person they champion can shine. War, and everything that supports and is supported by it is a Team effort. And we all know by now that there is no I in team....
Posted by:KCSueJuly 22, 2007 6:22:20 PMRespond ^
The US and we Brits created this mess, so it's right that we should pay for it to get fixed. But we can't do it ourselves - we are too implicated. The US and UK have to sign a blank cheque to the UN to sort it out, and provide all the political support necessary to persuade neutral countries to risk their troops to help.
Posted by:MCTJuly 24, 2007 7:01:24 PMRespond ^
Uhhhh, as a journalist working here in Iraq, I would like to note that Col. Johnson must be naive - talking to the insurgents is part of the journalism being covered here genius! Though it may be done in various fashions, it is an obvious fact that media attention can sometimes play to their advantage - sayyyy, like when American forces do bonehead things (no example given here, as they are too numerous to mention). And one final note to the CPIC commander, "Remember, YOU and the American military invaded Iraq under false pretenses when it was already 'stable,' and while doing so, created an 'insurgency' where one did not prevously exist, smart guy."
Posted by:Nathan HaleAugust 21, 2007 9:08:26 AMRespond ^
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 19 Iraqis working for U.S. and other foreign news outlets have been killed since the beginning of the war. Killed by enemy fire or Murdered by insurgents? The trend in reporting by Middle Eastern 'stringers' leans more towards fabrication of events that never happened. Bill Rogio's "Fourth Rail" online is the only site that provides a balanced report from Iraq. Perhaps the second most effective weapon for AQI/MahdiArmy, after spectacular suicide bombs, is the western press.
Posted by:BeddgelertAugust 21, 2007 9:34:47 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS