Abortion's Risk
Pro-choice groups should not fall into the trap of defending abortion as absolutely safe -- it may not be.
During the second 100 days of Gingrich rule, brace yourself for what promises to be the most vehement attack on abortion yet: an attempt by the right to persuade Americans that abortion increases women's risk of breast cancer. The battle lines are being drawn, and so far, most pro-choice groups have played right into Newt's hands.
The brouhaha began last November, when the Journal of the National Cancer Institute published a study by epidemiologists at Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center showing that for women under 45, induced abortion doubles breast cancer risk. "Approximately 1 woman in 100 develops breast cancer by age 45," says Janet Daling, the study's lead researcher. "Abortion raises that risk to about 2 per 100."
The risk depends, in part, on a woman's lifetime exposure to estrogen and the changes the hormone triggers in breast cells (see "Breast Cancer Cover-up," May/June 1994). Reproductive events--age of first menses, childbearing and breast-feeding history, age at menopause, spontaneous (miscarriage) and induced abortion experience--all affect estrogen exposure, breast-cell development, and breast cancer risk, as do environmental factors, such as exposure to organochlorines.
Anti-abortion forces who got wind of Daling's study fired off op-ed pieces like the one by Lynn Murphy in the San Francisco Chronicle, who hailed the report as "the 26th study [sic] showing that abortion greatly increases risk of breast cancer." Murphy urged "a moratorium on abortion until it's proven safe."
Unfortunately, most pro-choice groups have focused on the study's potential bias and limitations. With the exception of a few balanced fact sheets by some women's health organizations, pro-choice groups either dismiss the alleged association or concede the possibility of increased risk but call it "infinitesimal."
Such denials do a disservice to women and set pro-choice groups up as sitting ducks for GOP sharpshooters. Women deserve the facts. A Mother Jones search of the medical literature (from 1985 to the present) uncovered 24 studies dealing with abortion as a possible risk factor for breast cancer. The findings were mixed.
Nine studies show that induced abortion may increase the risk of contracting breast cancer, by as little as 10 percent to as much as 100 percent; 4 studies of spontaneous abortions show they increase risk. Abortion before a first full-term pregnancy appears to increase risk the most (1 study shows risk increasing with the number of abortions). Eight studies, 7 of which were of induced abortions, show no increased risk. Finally, 3 studies show that abortion decreases breast cancer risk.
At least four more studies are in progress; preliminary data from two suggest that abortion does increase breast cancer risk.
If abortion is linked to breast cancer, the risk increase appears to be modest, on the order of that observed in women who have taken the pill for many years or used postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), or who had their first period before 12, their first child after 30, or no children at all. The risk increase appears much less significant than the risk of having a mother or sister with the disease.
When the right starts advocating a "moratorium on abortion until it's proven safe," progressives should infuse the debate with something it has largely lacked--perspective. Pro-choice groups should not fall into the trap of defending abortion as absolutely safe. It may not be. Women should have access to all information that affects their health--and the right to choose what to do. For example, ERT may increase breast cancer risk, but it decreases risk of heart attack, making it a reasonable, in fact, potentially lifesaving choice for many women.
And Newt and his pals should not be allowed to frame the debate within the narrow construct of banning abortion. Congressional hearings must address our broader obligation to investigate all causes of breast cancer, and to find a cure.
FOR ABSTRACTS OF THE 24 STUDIES CITED IN THIS ARTICLE, SEND $3 TO COVER POSTAGE AND HANDLING TO "ABORTION'S RISK?", MOTHER JONES, 731 MARKET ST., SUITE 600, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103.
hey i think there are alot of risks for abortion and its also a SIN
ding LouisVuitton Wallets &
ding LouisVuitton Wallets & Purse handbag replica than you understand knock off replica handbag is good, hold cheap Bottega Veneta handbags right around your designer inspired Hermes handbags head, besides lined Christian Dior handbags up more station cheap louis vuitton handbags needed.My rather crisp replica handbags hat entrust flop Bottega Veneta knockoff handbags estranged on the louis vuitton handbag sides considering of handbag replica the more width.Now cheap Chanel handbags record embodied for designer inspired Chanel handbags the well-timed sides Dolce&Gabbana handbags replica are facing, also Christian Dior handbags se cheap Loewe handbags knockoff gucci Thomaswylde knockoff handbags designer replica handbags handbag replicas handbag replicas
abortion is a woman's right to choose any man can have his comment but the woman is the one who has the resposibility
the woman's "right to choose" came when she chose to have sex in the first place. If conception takes place her choice then becomes should I parent or place for adoption----her "right" to choose to murder her unborn child as a form of birth control (98% of abortions performed are for birth control reasons) is NOT a right----it is the deliberate killling of her unborn child for what is ultimately selfish reasons. there are many many risks to the mother both physical and emotional--and plenty of studies and evidence to back it up if one chooses to do a little unbiased research. Also in sworn testimony before Congress by world renown experts in the field the baby that is being aborted/killed after the 20 week mark and possibly BEFORE feels tremendous, excrutiating pain as she or he is being slaughtered----This testimony was given at Congressional hearings during which the partial birth abortion ban was being decided upon. Again, the evidence is out there for those who choose to educate themselves. I personally know 3 people who have had abortions--my sister had 2 abortions (both in the 1980's) I know what it does to women--i've seen it up close. The answer to an unplanned pregnancy is not to kill the baby--it is to love the mother and help and support her whether she parents or places for adoption--there are plenty of organizations out there that provide the help needed--even places to live for free if that is what is needed..Start by contacting a local crises pregnancy center.
I think that abortion is wrong becouse it is killing the life of A CHILD that has not had the chance to see or even enter this world. I am a year 10 student and we are learning about abortions and if they are right or wrong.Our class has had some very strong words to say about abortions.
i think that having an abortion is a risk for brest cancer but it is also wrong because that person is killing an inocent life it is not that baby's fault that person had sex and didn't protact there selves killing that baby is not the way to go.have that child and give him/her up for adoption if you have no other choice....
nisha
I think abortion is very bad. I mean come on who whould want to kill a living baby in side you......thats lke taking somebodys life away,that could of been somebody and done something in the world.......its so sad:{
Taking a life is an emoral act, and it is against God. Some women do not think about the act of taking a life until it over. It's time for women to be more resonsiable about bring a life in to this world. We have to stop using Abortion as a ease way out. We may think were getting away, butwere not. There will come aday when we are jugde buy God, for the sins we have commited.
abortion is a woman's right
abortion is a woman's right to choose any man can have his comment but the woman is the one who has the resposibility



























