Obama Just Granted Clemency to a Pot Lifer. But Dozens More Remain Behind Bars.

“We have many senior citizens who have already served decades for marijuana-only crimes that are being ignored.”

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-92429227/stock-photo-hand-of-the-prisoner-on-a-steel-lattice-close-up.html?src=1gQ4ntL4riUJK17aDoFL3A-1-10">BortN66</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Monday, President Obama commuted the sentences of 46 nonviolent drug offenders held in federal prisons. It was the highest number of commutations granted in a single day since the days of Lyndon B. Johnson. But for the 35,000 federal inmates who have applied for relief, it was a drop in the bucket.

And only one of the recipients of the recent commutations is a pot lifer: Francis Darrell Hayden, who was sentenced to life in prison in 2002 for cultivating a plant that more than half of the US population now believes should be legal. (He was growing a lot—more than 18,000 marijuana plants, obscured by rows of corn.)

As Mother Jones has reported, no fewer than 69 people are currently serving life sentences for pot-related offenses. “Of course they—the lifers—and I are all thrilled for the prisoners who were released, but we are all discouraged that so very few clemencies were given to marijuana offenders,” says Cheri Sicard, vice president of the CAN-DO Foundation, an advocacy group for nonviolent drug offenders. “We have many senior citizens who have already served decades for marijuana-only crimes that are being ignored.”

“We have many senior citizens who have already served decades for marijuana-only crimes that are being ignored.”

When it comes to pot lifers, as Jennifer Turner, Human Rights Researcher at the American Civil Liberties Union, puts it, “their only shot is clemency.” The pot lifers in federal prison include the world’s longest-serving marijuana prisoner, Antonio Bascaro, an 83-year-old grandfather who has been incarcerated for 35 years. There’s also John Knock, a first-time offender who got two life sentences for conspiracy to traffic large quantities of weed—which the government never actually seized. “They, and others like them, seem to have fallen through the cracks of the president’s clemency process,” says Sicard. (While only federal prisoners are eligible for presidential clemency, state prisoners are at the mercy of their governors.)

In 2011, as part of an effort to reduce the prison population and correct sentencing injustices, the Justice Department invited thousands of inmates to apply for executive clemency. Former attorney general Eric Holder also called on prosecutors to seek reduced sentences for drug offenders. His proposal was anticipated to make as much as 70 percent of federal drug offenders eligible for reduced sentences.

In President Obama’s address on the new commutations, he reiterated the sentiment behind this new approach: “These men and women were not hardened criminals, but the overwhelming majority had been sentenced to at least 20 years. I believe that at its heart, America is a nation of second chances. And I believe these folks deserve their second chance.” In a press release issued Monday, the White House stated that “federal sentencing practices can, in too many instances, lead nonviolent drug offenders to spend decades, if not life, in prison. These unduly harsh sentences are one of the reasons the President is committed to using all the tools at his disposal to remedy unfairness in our criminal justice system.”

To date, Obama has granted 89 commutations, 76 for nonviolent drug offenders. That’s more than the combined total granted by Presidents Reagan, Clinton, and both Bushes. The historically low number of granted clemencies can be traced back to the Office of the Pardon Attorney, which is charged with vetting and recommending clemency petitions to the White House. Housed in the Justice Department and largely staffed by career prosecutors, the OPA has a history of routinely denying petitions “without any real consideration,” according to Samuel Morison, a former OPA staff attorney-turned-whistleblower. “The number of times the president doesn’t do what the pardon attorney suggests is extremely low,” he says.

The OPA has a history of routinely denying petitions “without any real consideration.”

Of the 8,576 commutation petitions received during the Bush administration, the OPA favorably recommended only 6, according to Morison. (Eleven total were granted.) Under the previous head of the OPA, Ronald L. Rogers, a former military judge and major drug crimes prosecutor, Obama granted fewer clemencies than any other modern president. A 2011 ProPublica investigation found that under Rodgers and his predecessor, white applicants were four times as likely to be pardoned than applicants of color. Qualified applicants of color were summarily denied, while white applicants, often with far worse rap sheets, were granted pardons. Rogers was fired last April for withholding key information from the president in a high-profile clemency case.

Under new leadership at the OPA, Obama’s clemency numbers have steadily climbed. But considering that America’s federal prisons alone hold nearly 200,000 people—95,000 of them for nonviolent drug crimes—are 89 reduced sentences cause for celebration?

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate