DHS Official Who Made Islamophobic Comments Resigns. Another Remains in a Senior Role.

The two men have used similar language to describe Islam as a fundamentally violent religion.

Frank Wuco, now a senior arms control adviser at the State Department, dressed as his jihadist alter-ego Fuad Wasul.Internet Archive

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday, CNN reported that Rev. Jamie Johnson, a senior official at the Department of Homeland Security, had once said that Islam had given the world only “oil and dead bodies.” He had also argued that Jews became disproportionately wealthy through hard work while African Americans turned cities into “slums because of laziness, drug use, and sexual promiscuity.” Hours later, Johnson resigned as the head of DHS’s Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

But Frank Wuco, a senior White House adviser at DHS who has made similarly inflammatory comments about Muslims and other groups, is still working at the department in a role with significant implications for Muslims in America and abroad. Earlier this month, Mother Jones reported that Wuco has been in charge of implementing President Donald Trump’s executive orders at DHS since April. Those orders have included bans on travelers from some majority-Muslim countries. 

Frank Wuco.Courtesy of DHS

Like Johnson, Wuco has described Islam as a fundamentally violent religion. Johnson said that he doesn’t consider Muslim terrorists to be followers of “radical Islam” but rather “obedient Islam.” After the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando last year, Wuco told Steve Bannon’s Breitbart there was “nothing radical” about the shooter. “He is a Muslim who is following the strictures of Islam and its guidance and prescriptions for violence and warfare against unbelievers,” Wuco explained on camera.

Wuco’s website once claimed that while Muslims in other parts of the world were “perfectly happy to subjugate and humiliate non-Muslim members of their societies,” Muslims in the West were more likely to create Shariah-law enclaves that they would use to conquer the world.

At DHS, Johnson was tasked with helping emergency managers to work with the faith community in the wake of disasters—a job that could easily be undermined by comments offensive to black and Muslim communities. Similarly, Wuco’s work on executive orders involving Muslims could be influenced by his strong views and statements on Islam. But Wuco’s role is arguably the bigger one, with implications for national security and relations with the Muslim world.

In March, after his earlier travel ban was blocked in court, Trump issued an executive order directing DHS to provide him with a list of countries whose citizens should be banned from traveling to the United States. Five months after Wuco started running DHS’s executive order task force, the department recommended restrictions on seven countries: five majority-Muslim nations, as well as North Korea and Venezuela. In a September proclamation, Trump followed the department’s advice.

For a man whose role involves assessing security threats, Wuco has been quick to conclude—sometimes falsely—that attacks were perpetrated by Muslims. In 2011, Wuco incorrectly assumed that a Muslim was responsible for a mass-shooting in Norway that killed 77 people. He said he was “disgusted” that Muslim Americans pushed back against false reports that Islam had played a role. The next year, when a gunman opened fire in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, he wrote on his blog that the attack was “eerily similar” to a novel that features a Muslim terrorist who blows up a crowded movie theater. All of his “suspicions,” he wrote, were “so obvious that I will avoid the rush to lay them out there.” Later that day, the shooter’s identity was revealed. He was not Muslim. 

After a 2010 plot to kill the Pope was foiled, Wuco’s blog explained the Muslim plotters’ motivation:

1) He’s NOT going to accept Islam
2) He’s NOT going to submit and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya… sounds gross, I know)
3) That means… SLAY HIM, such is the reward of those who reject faith

Wuco’s rhetoric on African Americans has been less extreme than Johnson’s. But in 2012, he charged the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus with inventing racism and said he found the CBC’s existence “shameful” in the 21st century. “Real racism,” he suggested, was largely a thing of the past. 

Prior to joining DHS, Wuco hosted a radio show on which he sometimes highlighted the deaths or arrests of terrorists as “wargasms.” (On one occasion, he was accompanied by a sultry slow-jam; on another, he moaned, “Mmm baby, oh baby baby, mm, give it to me baby.”) Wuco also donned Middle Eastern garb and a fake accent to role-play as a fictional jihadist named Fuad Wasul in order to explain how he believes Muslims think:

video of Frank Wuco playing Fuad Wasul. Credit: Larry Willette/Vimeo

Before Johnson resigned, Tyler Houlton, a DHS spokesman, told CNN that “the administration does not support these statements made by Rev. Johnson, some of which were said nearly a decade ago.” Houlton also praised the work that Johnson did with the interfaith community while at DHS. After Johnson resigned, Houlton added that Johnson’s comments “clearly do not reflect the values of DHS and the administration.”

In October, Houlton told Mother Jones that Wuco was “a valuable member of the DHS team” and declined to say whether Wuco’s views on Islam affect his ability to work on issues that impact Muslims. 

DHS did not respond to a request for comment from Mother Jones about whether Wuco’s comments about Islam reflect the department’s values.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate