«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Bush Administration to California: Eff You

You know how the Right loves states' rights? Turns out that only applies when "states rights" means "persecuting minorities." It turns out that "Trying to avert near-certain global climactic doom," is not, apparently, a "state right."
Earlier today, the EPA denied California's request for a waiver that would allow the state to regulate automobile emissions. (This comes after a court fight that forced the EPA to rule on the request). The decision, according to the lede of a must-read Washington Post story, "overruled the unanimous recommendation of the agency's legal and technical staffs." Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of course promised to take the decision to court. David Bookbinder, the Sierra Club's chief climate counsel, told the Los Angeles Times, "These guys are 0 and 4 in court," he said. "And they're about to go 0-5." That's the part of this story that really says "Eff You": The EPA knows it's going to lose in court. From the Post story:
William Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, which represents officials in 48 states. . .[said the EPA] "has issued a verdict that is legally and technically unjustified and indefensible."
EPA's lawyers and policy staff had reached the same conclusion, said several agency officials familiar with the process. In a PowerPoint presentation prepared for the administrator, aides wrote that if Johnson denied the waiver and California sued, "EPA likely to lose suit."
If he allowed California to proceed and automakers sued, the staff wrote, "EPA is almost certain to win."
So in this one, the good guys will probably win again. But victory will mean delaying important greenhouse gas regulations for a stupid, petty, pointless court fight the Bush administration already knows it will lose. Chalk up another point for auto industry lobbyists and bad government.
Comments
It seems to me that this nonsense by the EPA goes beyond normal politics as usual and edges into deliberate incompetence.
Can't these people be sued for deliberately wasting public resources in a futile court battle?
Jeez, the things people talk about while out duck hunting.
Posted by: treehugger on 06/28/08 at 3:09 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Forecast for Solar: Cloudy (5)
Otto wrote:
breezi, Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
Über alles in...
[more]
America's Coral Reefs Declining (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
The decline so far will be nothing in comparison to the de...
[more]
Smart Energy = No More Wall Warts (1)
Fair Trade wrote:
I had no idea they used that much energy; do they all use ...
[more]
Making Fake Stuff Look More Real (5)
steve wrote:
IT would be a nice touch if they could come up with someth...
[more]
Snake Sidewinds Energy from the Sea (3)
Bert wrote:
How about a Big Giant Toilet Bowl float instead? Big truss...
[more]
Farms Kill Frogs (3)
cover me with blanket wrote:
This is hardly a subject to laugh about. It is frightenin...
[more]
Why Miles Per Gallon Suck (3)
Nancy wrote:
I seem to remember that the "Car Talk" brothers had a simi...
[more]
Clean Energy Leaps Forward (1)
Patrick wrote:
The exponential growth of green industry investment makes ...
[more]
Everglades Wins Big (10)
breezi wrote:
Lantern Bearer is so right. And, although I know it's ton...
[more]
Scientist on Warming: "We're Toast" (2)
Jill wrote:
Hanson is a false prophet, just like Al Gore who is such a...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Jon Koppenhoefer on 12/22/07 at 11:40 PM Respond