«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Foldable Cars Park (Stack) Like Grocery Carts

It's still only an idea. But a fine one from MIT's The Media Lab's Smart Cities. A futuristic electric CityCar that can drive itself and, at the press of a button, look for a parking spot behind others like itself, then fold in half and stack like a shopping cart. Reuters reports that a miniature mock-up version has gone on display at a campus museum, and there are plans to build a full-scale model this spring. Wired's blog Autotopia explained the car's premise some time ago:
The GM-backed CityCar prototype is a lightweight electric vehicle that's cheap to make and could be folded and stacked at transit hubs for rental by commuters under a shared-use model. The trick is to rethink the wheel. In the CityCar, a robotic drive system controls electric motors, steering and braking mechanisms, suspension, and digital controls embedded in each wheel — all integrated into plug-and-play sealed units that can be snapped on and off… Besides its stackability, its omnidirectional wheel configuration enables a turning radius of zero, turning U-turns into O-turns… Other features: push-button start, handlebars where the steering wheel would be, and a body made of Kevlar, carbon fiber, or some other lightweight composite.
Imagine if parking, drive time, congestion, navigation, and your fellow driver was no longer an issue. Imagine what that might do to emotional health, personal time & energy budgets, neighborly love, and the big CO2 footprint in the sky. Imagine if we didn't need to compete for space but could happily piggyback on each other. Okay, call me an idealist but there are days when the future looks good enough for hope... You'll have to navigate on your own through the Smart Cities pages to find the City Car. But it's a really fun ride.
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent, lecturer, and 2008 winner of the John Burroughs Medal Award. You can read from her new book, The Fragile Edge, and other writings, here.
Comments
This is absolutely genius. Do I think we'll see it in our lifetimes, probably not, but wow. We need more out of the box thinking like this.
I like this. It's a great feedback loop! Donald Shoup writes The High Cost Of Free Parking. An engineer reads it and begins thinking about how to solve the problem. Or, at least it appears to be a plausible way this idea may have come about.
Posted by: Misanthropic Scott on 03/07/08 at 5:23 PM Respond
This could do a lot to get rid of parking spaces...imagine the ability we'd have to make urban and suburban parking lots disappear. That's a whole lot of space saved...
Posted by: Bryson on 03/08/08 at 5:35 PM Respond
Oops. I left my iPod in my car. Can you back up those last 7 so I can open the door?
Posted by: Ruscle on 03/10/08 at 11:43 AM Respond
Never going to happen. Pretty, but like so many cute MIT schemes, a pipe dream. I wish. And yes, the guy above makes a good point -- need to access the vehicle to get stuff.
This country will never see these schemes. Europe, maybe. Here people are too selfish and shortsighted. We'll sink into the ocean before we improve.
Posted by: v on 03/10/08 at 12:42 PM Respond
so...we have the iphone and the lincoln navigator. What is wrong with this picture? Face it folks, we are just sheep. Stubborn sheep. We don't want to go the that fresh green pasture next door, because we like stewing in our own crap.
Posted by: extinct by nature on 03/12/08 at 4:51 AM Respond
This is a good idea, akin to the (more realistic, and already for sale) Tango electric car which seats two and is thin enough to park 90 degrees to the curb among parallel parking the way a motorcycle does.
However, these sort of solutions while way better than what we have today, are still only going to delay these sort of problems.
If we don't address population, eventually we'll need to rebuild all those parking lots to fit billions of half size cars, while freeways are clogged with 10 4ft lanes instead of 5 8ft ones.
We already have an even better solution: bicycles, trains, and only when necessary, buses. No parking issues, no traffic jams, no traffic fatalities, less stress.
Posted by: Bakari Kafele on 03/17/08 at 12:46 PM Respond
CO2 is a hoax. there is no excess of CO2 and never will be. there is also no greenhouse effect from CO2.
apparently the majority of the environmental community believes this hoax. this hoax is only intended to enslave and kill people. so if people breathe out CO2 that must mean the world population should be reduced. i encourage anyone reading this to do a google search on this issue and examine the facts.
rather than focusing on CO2 (the replacement hoax for the now dead global warming hoax) the environmental community should be focusing on the problems caused by the massive air pollution coming from automobile exhaust and industrial pollution as well as the pollution of our water.
Posted by: mark on 04/24/08 at 10:51 PM Respond
You are right mark.
Posted by: William on 04/30/08 at 2:47 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
RECENT COMMENTS
Some Corals Survived A-Bombs, Others Didn't (1)
BlueBerry Pick'n wrote:
that is fascinating. I'd never *considered* coral at all....
[more]
MoJo Nukes Convo: Judith Lewis Highlights (11)
Steven wrote:
Corn can be used for ethanol in cars and power plants, for...
[more]
MoJo Nukes Convo: Stewart Brand's Take (1)
G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996 wrote:
One of the comments you -- or your machine -- attributes t...
[more]
Antarctic Sea Ice Increase: Fodder for Global Warming Skeptics? (23)
Ted wrote:
Ed in Mt. You are right. America is the Saudi Arabia of Co...
[more]
Cheaper, More Reliable Solar? (2)
wiseman wrote:
Solar Thermal kicks ass....
[more]
Bush's EPA Pollutes Science (1)
Elydog wrote:
What is the American word for "Lysenko"?
Do we have a fav...
[more]
Bring Back the Bison (8)
Marilyn Wargo wrote:
Marilyn G and Old soldier,
The Area around Yellowstone has...
[more]
The Problem With Nuclear: No Uranium (9)
JimHopf wrote:
We will have enough uranium ore to meet our nuclear needs ...
[more]
Pro-Nuke? Anti-Nuke? Talk About It With the Experts (230)
Mother Jones Administrator wrote:
Thanks for the great dialogue, this conversation with the ...
[more]
Listen Up, Pandas, You Need to Fight (7)
tyxa wrote:
it"s so funny...........i like panda!!!!!!!!!!!...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: Green Building on 03/07/08 at 5:11 PM Respond