- ‹ previous
- 1357 of 2794
- next ›
The Blog Bubble
Responding to a reader who suggests that a 95% tax rate on very high incomes would be like legally capping the number of words a blogger is allowed to write, Matt Yglesias says he'd welcome such a thing:
Personally, I would love a legal cap on the number of words a blogger is allowed to produce per day. I’m privileged to have a job that I really enjoy. But at the same time, I would prefer to write somewhat less — this pace is stressful and doesn’t leave me as much time to pursue other projects and interests. But though I would prefer to write somewhat less, I have a stronger second-order preference to produce a blog that’s competitive with other major offerings on the internet. And over the years competition between bloggers has led to escalating word-counts. The resulting situation isn’t terrible, there are lots of people you should cry for before you get to me, but basically we bloggers are engaged in a red queen's race where we all need to keep trying harder and harder just to maintain our positions. A cap would be helpful.
This is the mentality of the bubble. Or cable news. Or something. Whatever it is, though, it's bad. We already have plenty of news mediums that reward instant, unthinking reaction, and the last thing the world needs is another one. The blogosphere would be a better place if everyone took a deep breath and decided that quality was more important than boosting traffic by simply having a post — any post — on every news event of the day. Slow down and think instead!
And as long as I'm in Andy Rooney mode, will all you kids get off my lawn? Thanks.





























Although I know this comment
Although I know this comment is made partly in jest, I think Kevin has been "walking the walk" in this regard. His posts have been extremely high quality and much appreciated recently, particularly about the financial crisis. He will never be as prolific as Yglesias, but he does hold an edge (recently at least) in terms of wisdom and depth. Perhaps a lot of this is attributable to age.
The Hedgehog, the Fox...and the Tortoise
[I tried to post this yesterday in response to the 3/26 entry “Listening to the Talking Heads” about the differences between hedgehoggish versus foxish weltanschauungen, but either because (cue self-pitying paranoia) Drum has joined the vast army of “liberal” journalists who pay lip but not ear service to those trapped in the pluto-spidery bonds of corporate niggerdom or, far more likely, because the security “upgrades” to his commenting software have rendered my normal primitive dialup connection inoperative (the same as the recent site makeover has replaced one set of problems -- overlapping text in the right hand column -- with another -- superslow loading times), I was unable to. So I’m trying again today. And if that doesn’t work, maybe I’ll try from the library. And if that doesn’t work, maybe I’ll try posting to another site, like...whitehouse.gov. {Well, no. I just checked, and their site is even more fucked up than Mother Jones’s. So much for Obama’s promise to reach out to the lo- to no-tech masses.}]
As a would-be hedgehog doomed by middlebrow intelligence and laziness to foxdom at best, rabbitude at worst, I read this entry and its comments with great interest. I have three comments to add of my own.
First, Nicholas Kristof, Tetlock, and Drum’s (KTD’s) understanding of the difference between the hedgehog and the fox seems to be this: the hedgehog is a monomaniac who knows a lot about a little and mistakenly assumes that he therefore knows a lot about everything, and the fox is a generalist who knows a little about a lot who wisely realizes that doesn’t mean he knows a lot about anything. In other words, the distinction for KTD seems to be one of temperament: the hedgehog is a blowhard like Christopher Hitchens, the fox is a Mr. Magoo like Thomas Geoghegan. However, as I vaguely recall (or misunderstand) from my limited reading on the subject (almost certainly in The Atlantic Monthly in the days before it became The Iraqi Monthly, the homeland for born-again fascists), the distinction lies strictly in the degree of one’s intellectual specialization. Just as the Greek aphorism from which the distinction arises has it, the fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing. (Thanks to kissin at 3/27/09/3:37 for the Wikipedia reference to the subject.)
Second, what made me laugh and decide to write this useless post which no one will ever see because it comes too late is the observation by Luther at 3/26/09/16:34: “I’ve noticed that when future courses are to be decided in areas where there is great uncertainty that domineering personalities who exude confidence tend to assume leadership no matter how stupid they are.” (In fairness, several posters before Luther made a similar point, but Luther’s struck me as funniest.) Adolf Hitler, as I noted in “[Heil Bushler”, my 28,000 word critique of the Bushler junta just prior to the Iraqi Anschluss, was of the same mind: “Here the folkish state must proceed from the assumptionthat a man of little scientific education but physically healthy, with a good, firm character, imbued with the joy of determination and will-power, is more valuable for the national community than a clever weakling. A people of scholars, if they are physically degenerate, weak-willed and cowardly pacifists, will not storm the heavens, indeed they will not even be able to safeguard their existence on this earth. In the hard struggle of destiny the man who knows least seldom succumbs, but always he who from his knowledge draws the weakest consequences and is most lamentable in transforming them into action.” (“Mein Kampf”, page 408. The italics are Hitler’s, not mine.) Bill Clinton, in explaining why Americans voted for Bushler over Gore and Kerry, made the same point: People prefer someone who is wrong and strong rather than weak and right.
Though redundant, it is worth quoting the cover letter that I sent along with the White House’s copy of “[Heil Bushler”:
“Brett Landgraf, 526{7} University Way NE, #224, Seattle, WA 98105, Voicemail: {Disconnected}
March 16, 2003
Rich Chancellor Adolf Bushler, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20500-0001
Dear George,
At first I was not going to send you this letter for three reasons: 1) You would not read it, 2) you have made clear that your respect for other people’s opinions lies only in the power to seize and neutralize them, and 3) you have filled me with your Holy Terror. But though you are on the path to tyranny, you are not there quite yet, and a decent respect for our Constitution compels me to address you directly. You are about to invade a country without provocation to enforce a United Nations resolution, but in DEFIANCE of the United Nations’s chosen course of procedure. In other words, you are about to destroy the United Nations to ‘save’ the United Nations. After 3 million deaths in Korea, 4 million deaths in Vietnam and Southeast Asia, 1.5 million deaths in Indonesia, 2.5 million deaths in the Middle East, unknown millions of deaths in Africa, and a couple hundred thousand deaths in Central America -- 11 to 15 million deaths in all -- to defend America against the advance of Russian and Chinese power in the world, it is not our moral right following the end of the Cold War to continue to wage arbitrary war at the expense of other nations’ lives and treasure. If you and your advisers take this step, in defiance of the will of the United Nations, without the justification of an honest threat to the security of the United States, in the name of a mere 3,000 victims of a criminal gang operating out of another country now defeated that lost 1,000,000 citizens fighting the Russians for us, then you and your men become war criminals, and our honor as a nation of liberty, justice, and democracy is destroyed. You turn the entire world, not just Russia and China, into our enemy. I ask you to reconsider this step, because once you take it, you launch the United States on a campaign of terror that must be despicable in the eyes of God.
Sincerely, Brett Landgraf, The Pink Nigger”
The White House’s response was to return their copy of “[Heil Bushler” a year later, apparently unread, with the dry observation that nobody by the name of “Rich Chancellor” or “Adolf Bushler” worked there. But six years later, as bob somerby at 3/26/09/11:56 and Me (not me, the writer of this post) at 3/26/09/14:50 point out, many of those who opposed the Iraqi Anschluss, despite being right, have not fared so well. While Adolf Bushler has retired to a nice house in Dallas with lifetime homeland security benefits from the Secret Service and his C.F.E. (Chief Fascist Engineer) Dick Cheney is building a third house outside the CIA’s gates to continue promoting the destruction of the Constitution, I am entering my 12th year of homelessness and economic cleansing, stripped of my 4th Amendment right to build or own any house at all in Washington State’s Martin Luther King County commensurate with my subminimum wage annual income. Two of the powerful “Democratic” officials who have colluded in my niggerization, Martin Luther King County Executive Ron Sims and former Washington State Governor Gary Locke, have been nominated for jobs with the Obama administration (Sims, ironically, as Deputy Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and Locke, almost as ironically, as Secretary of Commerce), and the same “liberal” journalists who have ignored and censored news of my niggerization since 1997 continue to do so. (The half-exceptions, for which I am provisionally grateful, are the comments sections of Salon.com, the Political Animal blog that Steve Benen took over from Kevin Drum at Washington Monthly, and Drum’s blog here at Mother Jones. The editors and writers of these right-thinking publications won’t have anything to do with me, and the putinauts at Salon insist on censoring all posts a) adapting the Declaration of Independence to fight corporate tyranny and b) showing the genocidal parallels between “Mein Kampf” and a harrowing subset of the 613 Jewish Commandments that form the ideological foundation of Israel, but they haven’t censored anything else I have written.)
Finally, a number of factors led me to a new solution of the Jewish Problem in Palestine. Isaiah Berlin, who repopularized the story of the hedgehog and the fox, was Jewish; the Jews justify their establishment of the state of Jewmany on the Palestinians’ land through the paradoxical claims that a) they won it 3,000 years ago through genocide against their Canaanite neighbors and b) the world should feel sorry for them because 70 years ago the Germans committed genocide against them (i.e. it’s ok for the Jews to commit Yahweh-sanctified genocide and ethnic cleansing against others but not for others to commit same against them); the world’s Jews have been just as if not more enthusiastic about Adolf Bushler’s neo-fascism as the Americans; talk of expelling all Muslims from Eretz Israel as a solution to the Arab Problem is all the rage in Jewmany today; I recently had to make an emergency cross-continental flight, my first venture into the icky hands of the Homeland Gestapo since shortly after 9/11, which thanks to Southwest Airlines cost me the miraculously low sum of $217 roundtrip; and thanks to this flight I chanced to read an article by Judea Pearl, father of slain Wall Street journalist Daniel Pearl, in which he called my criticisms of Jewmany “hate” speech. All this got me to thinking, what would it cost to transfer to relocation camps in Omaha, Nebraska, the 80% of Israel’s Jews who I am ungenerously assuming cheered Adolf Bushler’s assault on the American Constitution and who cannot stand the thought of equal rights with the sand niggers whom they have driven out of their homes from 1933 onward? The current population of Israel is 7,282,000, 80% of whom are Jewish, and the web site www.mapcrow.info calculates that the distance from Tel Aviv to Omaha is 6,473 miles while my there-and-back flight across America was 4,653 miles. So if Southwest Airlines was in charge of the reverse exodus under its “Wanna get away?” program, it would cost $1.4 billion to fly Israel’s 4,660,480 Jewish Arab-haters to the country that thanks to Constitutionally mandated religiously neutral immigration policies saved their sect’s asses from near total extinction by the Third Reich. That’s a one-time cost amounting to one third of the $5 billion that America splits 60-40 between Israel and Egypt EACH YEAR so that those two countries don’t declare war against each other. Even a Jew could appreciate a bargain like that.
Brett Landgraf
hey kevin
tagged as:- solution
hey kevin
would that cap on words apply to commentors, too?
just askin'.
wow
Bret, you leave me speechless.
Actually, Matt just slid out
Actually, Matt just slid out of that one.
There were actually two things the commenter compared the 95% marginal rate to: would Matt like it if the number of server hits on his blog were kept strictly limited because it clogged up the internet traffic i.e. in the interests of the public good (say to reduce internet traffic and reduce bandwidth)? And would Matt like it if he had to reduce the number of words he posts every day. Matt just latched on to the second one and said that he would welcome it - but the first one is arguably closer/analogous to the 95% marginal income tax rate and Matt completely avoided answering it.
I think Matt misses the
I think Matt misses the second piece of the analogy. It's not just being limited in words. It's being limited in revenue-creating productivity. If you get paid by the amount (Hello, Victor Hugo) and the amount you can produce gets capped, you're income is going to go down. It's not just that you get to work less.
Kevin, I take it we won't be
Kevin, I take it we won't be looking for your Twitter feed any time soon?
mediums
plenty of news mediums
We got lots of media, too.
I am Yglesias of Blog. You
I am Yglesias of Blog. You will be assimilated.
Conspiracy for the destruction of pixels
"General irregularities are known in time to remedy themselves. By the constitution of ancient Egypt, the priesthood was continually increasing, till at length there was no people beside themselves; the establishment was then dissolved, and the number of priests was reduced and limited. Thus among us, writers will, perhaps, be multiplied, till no readers will be found, and then the ambition of writing must necessarily cease."
- - Samuel Johnson: Adventurer #115
Get back to work whiner! ;^)
Get back to work whiner!
;^)
Well this goes a long way
Well this goes a long way toward explaining the remarkable stupidity of most of Yglesias's output.
Amateurs in equilibrium
The solution for us amateur bloggers looks quite stable: the group blog of half -a-dozen (in my case Mark Kleiman's RBC) can continue at a reasonable standard if each blogger posts once or twice a week, some more, some less. I reckon a blog has to have something new every day or the readers will drift away. This doesn't solve the problem of professionals like Matt and Kevin. But we don't crave multiple posts every day, do we?
The Shortness of Bloggers
...is sort of like the tallness of aunts, right? Atrios is much shorter than he used to be and not necessarily better...
reader count
Hear, hear, Kevin.
I read blogs mostly in Google Reader, checking in a couple of times a day. This gives me time to read most of what I want, and Yglesias is the exception, to the extreme. He writes so many posts that the unread count for his blog on my Reader page is an order of magnitude larger than the other blogs to which I subscribe! It's interesting to read the conversations between several bloggers, but frustrating to me that Matt posts so much. Often other bloggers quote him, call him a whippersnapper, etc., but I can't get all sides of it because I fall so very far behind! It's annoying!
But, whatever you do, keep the Friday Cat Blog posts rolling in, my man.
hai
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Alanna
http://www.craigslisthelper.info
Constitution compels me to
Constitution compels me to address you directly. You are about to invade a country without provocation to enforce a United Nations resolution, but in DEFIANCE of the United Nations’s chosen course of procedure. In other words, you are about to destroy
medyum araba oyunları
nike af1 light up shoes
Yes ,your article is very good, we have the same belief with you,so let me introduce
thearea to you.Now nike ,as the worldwide brand, is beloved by more and more people.Recently,i purchase a pair of Nike Men's AF1 Light-up Shoes in a online srore,they specialized in nike air force one sheos ,the air force one light-up shoes are high in quality.To buy af1 lights up shoes this time,i feel happy. because light up air force one give my feet utmost comfort.I recommend this best online store : http://www.af1star.com .
Yachtmaster replica
replica Rolex Daytona
Rolex Daytona replica
replica Rolex GMT
Rolex Day Date watches
replica Rolex Masterpiece
Rolex Masterpiece (watches) replica
Rolex Milgauss watch for sale
Hublot watches
Hublot watches
IWC watches
Jaquet droz watches
Lady Watch watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Rolex Datejust watch for
Rolex Datejust watch for sale
Rolex Submariner watch for sale
Yachtmaster watch for sale
Rolex Day-Date II watch for sale
Rolex Daytona watch for sale
Rolex Explorer watch for sale
Rolex GMT watch for
Rolex GMT watch for sale
Rolex Sea-Dweller watch for sale
Rolex Day Date watch for sale
Rolex Masterpiece watch for sale
Rolex Milgauss watch for sale
replica watch
replica Glashutte replica
replica Glashutte
replica Graham
replica Hermes
replica Montblanc replica
replica Montblanc
replica movado
replica omega
replica Rolex Day
replica Rolex Day Date
replica Rolex Masterpiece
replica Rolex Milgauss
Concord replica croum
Concord replica
croum replica
DeWitt replica
ugg boots uk
Eliminating the need for the extra trouble to wear ugg boots uk 、ugg boots sale, in the extreme sports, look for happiness in life, with Christian Louboutin and nike sb showed off your tall body, do not worry about being laughed at, dancing new style Christian Louboutin shoes、ugg boots london and ugg boots sale. The flavor of life that is colorful, there are Classic tall boots 、ugg sale、ugg london and nike dunk also used fear to creep away money from your pocket Mody ? Love beauty, you might even love Christian Louboutin Boots。