The Purpose-Driven Wife

Teaching women to submit to their husbands, for the love of Christ.

—Illustration: Yuko Shimizu

i first encounter "teacher and exhorter" Martha Peace at a Sunday-school hall on the campus of the First Baptist Church of Jonesboro, an 8,000-person megachurch in this verdant Atlanta suburb. Spacious enough to host its own congregation, the hall is flanked by embroidered banners bearing shields, birds, and crowns. The evening's emcee, Leanne, a peppy blonde with frosty blue eye shadow, says they represent the virtues of the nearly 120 women who came to see Peace speak as part of the church's "Women of Purpose" series. As daughters of the king of kings, Leanne explains, all Christian women wear crowns. But with that honor comes a mandate to apply their faith at home.

Peace is here to help. Over the past two decades, the 62-year-old Georgia native and former nurse has written five books on biblical womanhood, conservative Christianity's answer to the women's movement. Among them are The Excellent Wife, now a classic in this burgeoning niche, and Damsels in Distress, a set of biblical solutions to female problems ranging from pms to depression to "feminist tendencies." It's common for a young Christian wife to rebel against home life as her primary ministry, Peace writes in Becoming a Titus 2 Woman, which lays out the principles of her ministry model. It's the role of older women to help her understand her priorities.


story continues below story continued from above

Those priorities may include rising early to feed the family, being available anytime to satisfy a husband's desires (barring a few "ungodly" or "homosexual" acts), seeking his approval regarding work, appearance, and leisure, and accepting that he has the "burden" of final say in arguments. After a wife has respectfully appealed her spouse's decision—a privilege she should not abuse—she must accept his final answer as "God's will for her at that time," Peace advises. The godly wife must also suppress selfish desires (for romance, a career, an equitable marriage), practice addressing her spouse in soothing tones, and maintain a private log of bitter thoughts to guide her repentance. "If you disobey your husband," Peace admonishes in The Excellent Wife, "you are indirectly shaking your fist at God."

The popularity of her audiotapes and books, translated into several languages and used as curriculum by Christian women's groups, has made Peace a celebrity in fundamentalist circles, with appearances at conferences and Bible meetings throughout the world. But she's just one among hundreds of professional Titus 2 mentors, older women who help younger ones—as outlined by Apostle Paul in Titus 2:5—"to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God."

The mentoring tradition, carried out largely by thousands of lay churchwomen, fell into neglect starting in the 1960s—its leaders blame feminism—but has since enjoyed a strong resurgence in congregations ranging from the millions-strong Southern Baptist Convention to the constellation of independent Reformed evangelical churches. (Saddleback megachurch pastor Rick Warren, Obama's controversial pick for the inaugural invocation, also preaches wifely submission. The church website cites Ephesians: "So you wives must willingly obey your husbands in everything, just as the Church obeys Christ.")

Titus 2 ministering can take many forms: one-on-one sewing and housekeeping instruction, submission-centric books and magazines—one of the oldest, Above Rubies, boasts a print run of 150,000—and speaking engagements ranging from Peace's intimate dinner talks to Promise Keepers-type stadium rallies. Together, these ministries form the backbone of what its adherents call biblical man/womanhood, complementarianism, or simply the patriarchy movement.

This article is adapted from Kathryn Joyce's Quiverfull: Inside the Christian Patriarchy.

good spousekeeping

Martha Peace on how to be the wife God intended

  • On feminism: "Instead of dwelling on what I think I deserve, I should be thinking that I am to serve the Lord graciously, however He chooses."
  • On widowhood: "Younger widows are to remarry rather than have idle time to gossip."
  • On extramarital friendships: "Turn from wrong thinking about the other person to right thinking about God and your responsibility to honor and worship Him."
  • On pms: "Lord, forgive me for maligning You. Instead, use me for your glory however you choose. If the pms symptoms have to continue, they'll just have to continue."
  • On vanity: "Beauty is one of the ways the adulteress draws her prey...[but] it is all right to have some external adornment, because stripping oneself of all makeup and wearing only plain, drab clothing does not make a woman more pleasing to God."

In preparation for Peace's supper session, Jonesboro's churchwomen, dressed Southern-belle modern in garden-printed blazers, filmy blouses and pearls, and elegant updos, shuffle through a buffet line collecting plates of baked chicken, pasta salad, and a green salad adorned with flecks of chocolate. With everyone settled, Peace, whose short dark brown hair closely frames a stern, youthful face, takes the podium to regale the ladies with tales of her marital missteps three decades past.

She breaks the ice with a laundry list of "I'd just be happy if"demands she'd put on her husband before she was saved at age 33. She'd just be happy, she mockingly recalls, if they got married, had a child, moved back to Georgia from her husband's military post in Germany, had a second child. The women laugh as Peace mimics his "okay" in the crushed monotone of a henpecked sitcom hubby. She continues, describing her slide from demanding wife to substance-abusing, adulterous, career-worshipping feminist who farmed her children off to babysitters, nearly left her marriage, and even contemplated suicide. Only then did she find God and begin her transformation to "excellent wife."

The ladies are familiar with Peace's narrative, a story of female salvation that comes from accepting God's intentions—salvation, in particular, from the deceptions of the "egalitarian" feminist worldview. Peace calls her story "the taming of the shrew," a coinage her protégés adopt in describing their own wifely conversions.

Sensitive to charges that her busy career might contradict her message, Peace reassures audiences that she ministers only to women, and only under her pastor's supervision. Indeed, the Titus 2 movement finds its most prominent voices in the Kentucky-based Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and a roster of conservative male theologians that includes John Piper, founder of Desiring God Ministries; John MacArthur, megachurch pastor of Grace Community Church; Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary; and Bruce Ware, president of the Evangelical Theological Society, who caused a public stir last June when he told a Texas audience that domestic violence often stems from women's lack of submission. (Mohler irked fellow hardliners last fall when he and others reached for loopholes to justify Sarah Palin's candidacy as biblically permissible. "Palin represents the feminist lie that a woman can do it all," countered one critic at fundamentalist website VisionForum.com.)

These church leaders argue that a generation of women has abdicated its sacred responsibility by ignoring biblical directives that used to reign unchallenged. In addition to the "corrupting" influence of feminism on the wider culture, they fear feminization of the church by female-majority congregations, the concept of a soft and womanly Jesus, and the elevation of women to positions of church authority. Their concerns extend to questions—on Christian marriage counseling; on women speaking in church or exercising authority over men as, say, teachers or cops—that are nearly as divisive in conservative churches as gay marriage is in mainline denominations. "A lot comes into this," Peace tells me. "Not just husbands and wives, but women as pastors, women in church. It's not a matter of 'Good Christians can differ on the issue.' This is a slippery slope they're on. It's like wherever the world goes, 30 or 40 years later, the church goes, too."

As an alternative, the movement offers a "separate but equal" division of duties and authority. Men, the embodiment of Christ, are the breadwinners and spiritual leaders in worship, decision making, finances, and sex. Women, representing the church, are encouragers, "completers," and helpmeets, bound to transform the culture by example and to sacrifice in God's honor.

Reaching this austere conviction via shared women's study is a process that oddly parallels the protofeminist consciousness-raising groups of the '60s and '70s, in which women recognized their common complaints as part of a larger pattern of oppression. Gloria Steinem called those groups "the primary way women discover that we are not crazy, the system is." But the Titus 2 message is precisely the opposite: The Lord's system is righteous, ungrateful feelings are sins to be surmounted, and feminist rebellion is a cultural scourge to be eradicated. The radical leap taken by Titus 2 women is unconditional surrender—an army of Phyllis Schlaflys, fighting for their own subordination based on the promise that the meek shall inherit the Earth. "It is a revolution that will take place on our knees," writes author and Peace's contemporary Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

And a revolution it may be. In October, more than 6,000 women turned out for DeMoss' "True Woman" conference in Chicago, affirming their holy duty to leave a legacy of "fruitful femininity" for the next generation.

"You don't have to be a damsel in distress," Peace reminds the women of Jonesboro. "God has already ordered your steps and has a perfect plan to accomplish his will in your life." Around the Sunday-school hall, plastic dinner plates pushed to the side, dozens of women bend over their event programs, not praying just yet, but taking notes in the margins.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.
Comments
no profile pic for comment author

... what?

... what?

no profile pic for comment author

Man, this whole thing is

Man, this whole thing is insane. Women willingly submitting to slavery in the name of religion? Because they're afraid of going to hell? It's laughable. But for the religions that push this drivel, what a great scam, so long as they can convince the saps to swallow it!

no profile pic for comment author

So interesting post And you

So interesting post And you say what? What is this "what"?
Shame on you!
Understand?

no profile pic for comment author

That sounds familiar.

"separate but equal"
Now where have I heard that before?

"Men, the embodiment of Christ"
I thought it was the bread and wine of communion that embodied Christ?

And finally,
"The radical leap taken by Titus 2 women is unconditional surrender"
Radical? No, this is old, dusty and pathetic.

no profile pic for comment author

What a load of garbage

I agree with this poster....Paul was a misanthropist (woman hater). For all I hear about the bitching and groaning from Republicans about the nomination of President Obama's staff, yet they follow the teachings of a man who was one of the worst men of the bible, that is until his conversion to christianity. But lest we forget he was a prison guard and kept that mentality, punish, punish, hated free thought....

I hate religion and all it's bullcrap...I wish there were no religion. Wow, that sounds very peaceful to say and to feel.

FFRF (Freedom From Religion Foundation) Piss of a Republican and think for yourself.

no profile pic for comment author

Correction!

Minor point, Anonymous, but I think you mean misogynist. A misanthropist is a hater of (all) humankind. Maybe Paul was that, too, but a someone who hates women is a misogynist (and seriously sick, IMHO!)

no profile pic for comment author

You might be surprised to

You might be surprised to find out how many people agree with you - among them, ME.

no profile pic for comment author

define misanthropist

Misanthropist means someone who hates people. I don't hate women alone, I hate men, women, and hermaphordites all the same. I hate humans for being humans, not women for being women

no profile pic for comment author

I undestand

why you think it would be nice to have no religion. Many religions cause more harm than good. But in a way, militant atheism can be harmful too. I notice that many people who say they are atheists, are simply people who became disillusioned with Christianity, but didn't realize (or didn't look into) the fact that there are hundreds of different religions out there! I became disillusioned with Christianity and became Wiccan. Yes, there are some militant Wiccan out there who HATE Christians and actively try to upset or convert them, and they are just as bad as militant Christians or militant atheists. But for the most part, Wiccan don't give a damn what anyone else believes, as long as no one belittles our beliefs. Which is probably why atheists bug me. It is not necessary or fair to dismiss all faith or spirituality just because some religions cause harm. I am angered that because of Christianity and Islam, many fascinating animist cultures across the globe have been wiped out, or virtually wiped out. It's probably inacuarte to say I am Wiccan. I believe in a God and a Goddess, because that makes sense to me, I believe in the power of nature and the elements, and I just plain love learning about other religions. They fascinate me, and I often incorporate different aspects of different spiritual paths into my own. I am not harming anyone, I am not ignorant. I am a better person for having my spirituality, and so are many.

So, my point being, you don't have to be an atheist just because you don't want to be Christian, and you don't have to hate all religion just because you hate a few. There are so many other options. The world of faith is rich and vibrant. Explore!

no profile pic for comment author

Wow.

"[S]eeking his approval regarding work, appearance, and leisure, and accepting that he has the "burden" of final say in arguments."

What happened to marriage being a partnership? Sorry, our society is dynamic and is not what it has been during Biblical times. Try interpreting the Bible within it's historical context, instead of its literal context.

In the USA, I always hear how freedom is a basic right for all people. Just to be clear, "people" includes women, too.

no profile pic for comment author

Oh, come on!

So marriage is not a partnership, but an ownership with total control belonging to the husband? If that's the case, I'm keeping to my hedonistic ways.

no profile pic for comment author

big man in the sky says 'boo'

Methinks these are men that need women to be brainwashed
to stick around with them.

It's a conspiracy to get all the unsuitable men mated.
No woman in their right mind would submit to all that.

no profile pic for comment author

You almost have it figured

You almost have it figured out. Religion is how the elite and powerful harness male sexuality for thier benefit. Look at all the putz's in the mormon church who are awarded child brides. One extreme example, but true never the less. It is easy to see a similar ritual in most churches.

no profile pic for comment author

Slippery slope?

I love the old "slippery slope" argument that fundamentalist Christians like to use. Me? I think it's a slippery slope from being "the excellent wife" to Taliban-style treatment of women. But then again, I believe marriage is a partnership, so obviously I'm a man-hating feminazi.

no profile pic for comment author

Seriously!

What's described in the article already *is* Taliban-style treatment of women.

no profile pic for comment author

It's different from the

It's different from the Taliban in that these women have a choice.

My questions about this are: Why do women choose to do this? and, Are there studies that show consistent positive results: increased happiness, reduction in family breakdowns, etc?

no profile pic for comment author

I did try this, with a

I did try this, with a husband who was something of a bully. The acquiescent that you are around a bully, the more bullying they do, and the marriage ended in the anticipatory domestic violence. So did this lead to happiness? Yes! I'm out of that marriage and married to a partner (not owner) now, although being able to leave that marriage resulted in a lot of close calls. Do I recommend this for other women? No, not at all.

no profile pic for comment author

I did try this, with a

I did try this, with a husband who was something of a bully. The acquiescent that you are around a bully, the more bullying they do, and the marriage ended in the anticipatory domestic violence. So did this lead to happiness? Yes! I'm out of that marriage and married to a partner (not owner) now, although being able to leave that marriage resulted in a lot of close calls. Do I recommend this for other women? No, not at all.

no profile pic for comment author

"Why do women 'chose' to do

"Why do women 'chose' to do this?"
Well, bless your little heart for attempting to bait an argument over the dead issue that victims of inequality just love subjugation. What studies? There are no studies except a bunch of ministries who promote this form of Stepford-ism as it's vehicle to form of human slavery. The actual academic literature obliterates your premise of "some studies" showing family members/families are happier is, bunk; families that won't "submit" are simply run out of the church community making the "some studies" faulty. Oh please...read books about the women of Afghanistan under the Taliban/husband rule and compare the "choices" women make in these kinds of communities. You really must live a sheltered life...

no profile pic for comment author

"Why do women do this?" In

"Why do women do this?"

In my case, because I was taught that this was correct. As a teenage girl, I was years away from marriage, so I never bothered to reason this out. I just learned that this was what I had to do to be a good girl and not go to Hell.

Luckily, someone smacked upside the head with the clue stick when I was 21, so I got out of that mess. I really feel now that I dodged a bullet, because I didn't get married to some gynephobic asshat.

I hope the guy who said that domestic violence is justified by women's lack of submission gets home to find a "Dear John" letter from his Mrs.

no profile pic for comment author

why women choose

Obviously, it's not all women that choose this. The psychological pattern is called Authoritarian Submissive, and you can read about it here:
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
Dr. Bob has 40 years of research to back up his assertions. John Dean based his book, Conservatives Without Conscience on Altemeyer's work.

no profile pic for comment author

Yeah

I was gonna guess there was some psychological component to it. It kind of all goes back to what you were taught growing up. I'm only 21, but I clearly remember being bombarded both at school and in children's media that girls were expected to be pretty and perfect so that they could get a husband, have children, and take care of a home. Even my piano teacher, who I loved, was a devoted Christian with 4 kids, and once told me that having to keep my nails short was for piano was good preparation for keeping them short to make being a housewife easier. I just laughed. I didn't mean to, that's just the natural reaction I had at tweleve. I wasn't going to be a housewife, I was going to be a marine biologist, dammit!

The subtle invasion of conservative ideals in the school system is rampant. As a child, you believe that all policemen are good, prosecutors are heroes, and defense attorneys are as evil as the criminals they defend. I was always a rebel in school and those in charge would sometimes truly to derail me by telling me I should behave like a proper girl, which made me feel awful, since I was awkward and chubby back then.

In high school, you learn from your peers that the only way to get a boy to love you is to be his sexual plaything. If he leaves you, it's your fault for not being good enough, but at least you'll be more experienced so maybe you'll be able to hold onto the next one. I grew up believing that because I wasn't drop dead gorgeous I needed to be everybody's doormat in order to validate my existence. And yes, I know that is a psychological problem. My parents were both ardent feminists and yet I still had these self-esteem issues.

I say all this because I was probably a good candidate at that time to get trapped in a situation like that. I had very low self-esteem, had never really had a boyfriend, was an only child and rather lonely. My rebellious streak probably would have reared its head eventually but I could possibly have joined an insane movement like this as a way to try not to feel lonely anymore. I would have thought that maybe this is the only way to get a guy to love me. Of course, I have major problems with Christian doctrines to begin with, but I successfully hid that fact from my very Christian best friend for a goof five years, so I had practice. Luckily I was saved, because I met a man who was more of a feminist than I was and wouldn't let me get away with any door-mat business. But if he hadn't come along, who knows what might have happened to me? And I've been a liberal since birth!

no profile pic for comment author

Not a choice, really

It's not really a choice, if you believe you are going to Hell if you don't submit.

no profile pic for comment author

voluntary?

When your parents, your peers, your church, your school, etc. tell you that to be female is to be submissive, then you start to believe it. They are using a mentoring system to teach young girls the "rules." How voluntary is it? To me, not very.

It is the teachings of patriarchy and despite the fact that women are doing the teaching, they are using a system that was created by men/for men. Women had no part in the planning, just in the implementing. And the price to pay if they don't confirm? loneliness, unhappiness, perhaps shunning and abuse. Whenever there is a price to pay for the alternative, there leaves very little room for volunteerism.

no profile pic for comment author

Wow, I do not even know what

Wow, I do not even know what to say. I second the idea that this helps getting certain kinds of men married. Stuff like this is why I left Christianity and started to practice Wicca. The Goddess would never put up with stuff like this. But then I do like being a liberal, feminist, witch. Goddess Bless

no profile pic for comment author

Don't stop there, you'll disappoint Pat

What about leaving your husband, killing your children, destroying capitalism and becoming a lesbian? ;-P

no profile pic for comment author

Blessings to you as well

That's exactly why I left. I also am a witch, although concentrating on Celtic dieties. While I was married and still Catholic, I was told by a priest that I needed to offer it up if my husband cheated or hit me. That's such bullshit--I think even Jesus is upset by all this blather. Free yourselves, sisters!!!

no profile pic for comment author

it is important for some to

it is important for some to believe in a myth... any myth... the more closely the myth represents current conclusions the better, though. why not just stop with current conclusions and leave the myths in their proper place... as historical artifacts

no profile pic for comment author

What a sick and twisted

What a sick and twisted mind. And there are really women buying that crap? I so much prefer being an atheist.

no profile pic for comment author

Which minds?

Which minds do you think are sick and twisted? The folks who sell oppression of women today or Paul and the rest of the writers of the New Testament? I'm willing to say all of them.

I would also ask that the women selling this nonsense today take their own advice and shut up.

no profile pic for comment author

I Agree with the atheist

I read the article and wanted to vomit. Women are not doormats, punching bags, sex toys, cooktops or washing machines. We are individuals with a brain and any woman who follows this advice has lost her mind. And being an atheist women, with a brain, I can seperate fact from fiction and manure from the roses.

no profile pic for comment author

Wow, EW

Who decided that this story should go through?? These people do NOT need any publicity, this is disgusting.

no profile pic for comment author

The reason this story need

The reason this story need to be told is not to give sick, twisted, pretend christens publicity, no. Rather it is to expose them for the sick, twisted, pretend christens they are. By ignoring them and pretending that they don't exist we as a free people are giving tacit approval to their archaic, draconian ways. Only through education, conversation, and informed debate can the issue of misogynistic christen female slavery be properly exposed for the deeply disturbing, flawed practice that it is. That said, this is a free country where these citizens have the right to their own superstitious beliefs. I still think the best way combat ignorance is through education and when the light of truth and freedom shines on these cockroaches they will scurry back under their rocks. further, we must pledge to help our sisters that have fallen under the influence of these counterfeit christens. When they are physically and psychologically abused, tortured and raped by their "loving" husbands we must be there to aid in the healing and assist in the recovery.
Blessed be,
A real Man of another God under the auspices of a caring Goddess

no profile pic for comment author

Jonesboro or Jonestown?

This just confirms that religion is a man-made institution, with the emphasis on "man." What a crock. And "Peace" has to get permission from the men to speak. Unbelievable. But it is OK for Sarah Palin to "you be da man?" Whatever makes you happy, Stepford wives. Drink the cool-aid. Was that Jonesboro or Jonestown?

no profile pic for comment author

Please realize that most

Please realize that most Christians do NOT believe this. Don't judge us all because this woman is an idiot. With people like this, they need to have something unyielding to hold onto. She described herself as a drug addict and adulterer BEFORE her conversion. Poor dear--this is the only way she can cope.

Most of us married feminists are NOT addicts or adulterers. Most Christian women are not abused by their husbands, wouldn't put up with it. By saying we are submissive, you fall into the same trap this idiot woman did--all or nothning.

no profile pic for comment author

Just a thought. . .

If you would take the time to really understand the concept behind this, you would see that this type of marriage is the greatest kind of give and take there can be. The man, loving his wife like Christ loved the church means he willing sacrifices himself daily to love her truly and deeply. The wife does have a say in their marriage but does so humbly and gently and they work together instead of against each other, each fighting for their own way. If you have never tried living and loving like this, I don't think you have the right to say that it's "sick and twisted". I think the author of this article has not clearly represented the whole idea behind this and if you could see this lived out in a marriage, you would see the beauty of a truly loving relationship that is in the best interest of everyone involved.

no profile pic for comment author

You're right, it's not sick

You're right, it's not sick and twisted, but it *is* outdated. Do we still keep slaves? Do we still put people in mental institutions for masturbating too much? Do we still burn witches at the stake? If your answer to any of these questions is no, then I challenge you to tell me how a marital arrangement considered ideal in the *Bronze Age* has any kind of application to 21st-century life outside of very basic principles (i.e. treat your partner with respect if you don't want them to leave you). Women are not property anymore; this "purpose-driven" nonsense is simply a fancy way of spreading a toxic meme that they should be despite all logic to the contrary.

no profile pic for comment author

Actually, it is sick and twisted

These types of relationships are built on the psychological pathology of both spouses. The relationship itself and how each person handles it are just symptoms of the psychological problems already present. Not a whole lot different from what attracts people to cults. These are typical symbiotic sado-masochistic relationships. The man needs to control - to feel secure, and the woman needs to be controlled - to feel secure. So they 'work' well together in their mutually insecure state. A self secure woman would never allow herself to be dominated in this way by giving up her own self determination, and a self secure man would never be content with or respect a woman who is willing to do so, follows his agenda instead of being a free thinker, and has such a poor sense of self. That's why you always can see the pathology if you scratch the surface. The relationship may appear to work (if the man is not abusive), but only b/c each partner balances the gross insecurities in the other. I call them relationships made in hell. Have counseled countless couples like this. Many of these relationships are outright physically abusive both to the wife and children, and almost all are emotionally abusive behind doors if not in public. The children in the abusive situations are almost always severely scarred emotionally for the rest of their lives. Even if there is no physical or emotional abuse between the parents, the daughters often in up being abused in their later relationships.

Mike

no profile pic for comment author

Oh yeah, real give in take

Oh yeah, real give in take when the woman has to submit to the man's will and can only make suggestions. If that doesn't sound abusive I don't know what is.

no profile pic for comment author

It's not for you, nor this

It's not for you, nor this Peace lady, nor anyone to say what's best for me or anyone else. This arrangement, however you dress it up, gives women no control over their destiny, no choices, and treats them like property. The very idea that a woman is somehow responsible for the domestic abuse she may suffer completely robs this argument of any validity.
A marriage is a partnership, it's about two people being equals. Couples can disagree and debate and discuss, while still loving and sacrificing for one another. This model is a reactionary ploy perpetrated by people with clearly deep-seated insecurities.

no profile pic for comment author

Response to "Just a Thought...."

Wow lady, if you really believe this to be a healthy marriage situation, not only is your husband one lucky bastard, but you truly are BRAINWASHED. In fact I know most people are Christians because they're afraid. Wake up lady before you've wasted your entire life on a man-made ideology!

no profile pic for comment author

wait, what?

Why is this woman's husband lucky? His wife is brain dead!

This arrangement is as insulting to men as to women.

no profile pic for comment author

You write that you "know

You write that you "know most people are Christians because they are afraid." I am not certain of your meaning. What is the fear? How did you come to learn/know this?

no profile pic for comment author

You write that you "know

You write that you "know most people are Christians because they are afraid." I am not certain of your meaning. What is the fear? How did you come to learn/know this?

no profile pic for comment author

You write that you "know

You write that you "know most people are Christians because they are afraid." I am not certain of your meaning. What is the fear? How did you come to learn/know this?

no profile pic for comment author

You write that you "know

You write that you "know most people are Christians because they are afraid." I am not certain of your meaning. What is the fear? How did you come to learn/know this?

no profile pic for comment author

Christian marriage

I too have a truly loving and Christian relationship that is in the best interest of everyone involved, but I do not submit or lower any of my own self-respect and integrity, and my husband would not have it any other way. I do feel very sympathetic towards these misguided individuals who would force women into actual slavery to their husbands.

This is a repulsive idea, and the very reason that the feminist movement started in the first place. We do not hate men, we love them completely, even to the extent that we know and trust that they are real men and do not have to depend on worship or submission by anyone to boost their egos, especially not their own wives!

no profile pic for comment author

re: just a thought....

What you describe sounds like my marriage. We talk things over, we come to agreement, we rarely raise our voices. Our marriage is based on mutual love and respect. My husband works hard to support us...so do I. In the case of disagreements, we keep talking and gathering info until we figure out what we want to do.
Did I mention we're Pagan?
The logic of the patriarchy movement is not, at it's root, very different from the logic of the white supremacist movement. "I'm right, just because God made me better than you." It attracts those who want to dominate others and those who don't want personal responsibility for making their own decisions. "I was only following orders."

no profile pic for comment author

All Well and Good If...

Being a pro-choice feminist, I have to include this "lifestyle" as a valid choice for women who want to make it. If I tried it in my own last relationship, we would have been homeless (since I made 75% of our income), but I guess that just goes to show what I know. If the woman wants a traditional home and her faith leads her down this path, who am I to judge?

Not forme, but not harmful to the woman who chooses it. I just worry about the women in the church who don't choose it, but have husbands who expect them to.

no profile pic for comment author

Thank you

I want to thank the readers who did not take a hardline approach to this article. Many Christian women believe that it is Biblical and therefore their duty to submit to their husbands. It is a choice just like being a Christian is a choice. I was taught as a child that we have free will as humans... that includes free will to obey or disobey. A woman only does this if she chooses. She should never be forced. However, if she chooses, then we should respect her choice just as we respect women in Islam who choose to veil (not being forced to veil), or women who choose circumcision ( i don't know if there is any woman who would choose circumcision, though).

Post a comment
Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

Mother Jones Podcast
Get in on the conversation! We talk about culture, politics, the environment, the economy and more. Listen now!

TalkBackTees.com
A treasure trove of liberal wit, wisdom and quotations, from ancient to modern, on colorful, cotton tees.

Support Independent Artists
Amazing art, crafts, apparel, paper-goods and more. A carefully curated selection of sundries since 1999.

FREE CONNECTIONS FOR GREEN SINGLES
Meet progressive singles in the environmental, vegetarian & animal rights community who share your values