« Iraq Study Group: Some of it is Nonsense, or How is This Going to Work, Exactly? | Blog Index | CNET's James Kim Found Dead »
A Child Born of Vice
Mary Cheney, the vice president's 37-year-old lesbian daughter, is pregnant. In Virginia. Last month, Virginia passed an absurdly stringent amendment [PDF] barring domestic partnership benefits—ostensibly for same-sex couples, but the amendment was worded so vigorously that many expect it will affect straight couples as well.
Virginia Republicans strongly supported the measure. Although the younger Cheney called it "a gross affront to gays and lesbians everywhere," in the past she has campaigned for her father, Darth Vader of the Republican Storm Trooper army.
So where does the amendment leave Heather Poe, Mary's partner of 15 years? Nowhere, it seems. Virginia's notoriously conservative courts are leading the charge to deny same-sex partners any rights to the children they help raise. Jennifer Chrisler of Family Pride, the largest gay-lesbian family advocacy group in the country, said that unless the couple moves to a "less restrictive" state, "Heather will never be able to have a legal relationship with her child."
If the couple were to split up, Heather would be especially screwed because her credentials can't compete with Mary's. Cheney has a high-powered corporate job at AOL. Heather is a "former park ranger," who is now renovating the couple's Great Falls, Virginia, home. If history is any guide, the V.P. wouldn't hesitate to use his friendships with judges to get what he wants. Cheney appears to be supportive of Mary and Heather's relationship, but he has, according to Chrisler, "been complicit in the largest full-scale attack on the LGBT community in modern history." It seems safe to say he'd want Mary to have full custody.
For now, the Washington Post reports that the vice president is "looking forward with eager anticipation" to Mary's baby's birth. But can you imagine Dick "Dick" Cheney smiling?
Posted by Cameron Scott on 12/06/06 at 12:42 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
As a Virginia resident who opposed the amendment who worked the polls on election day it both pained and chagrined me that Virginians let bigotry rule the day. There is not much that makes me ashamed of being an American, but I went home bleeding that day, at the short-sighted rush to take human rights away from a particular group. I wonder where those self-satisifed bigots will be when this amendment starts causing problems for heterosexual people. Will they repeal it the first time a woman dies because she's not married to her abuser and couldn't get a restraining order?
So on and so on.
Posted by: dejah on 12/08/06 at 8:03 PM
Another opportunity for the pot to call the kettle black? A wonderfully written article but the best the Democrats have to offer in this bonfire of political vanities is the tarnished star of an African-American "civil rights lawyer" (so called) who's only rationale for denying gays the fundamental civil right of marriage are his religious beliefs. When the volk bow down to a media created "superstar" who would use the illicit means of violating the First Amendment to achieve the illicit end of denying civil rights guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment then Winston Churchill was right when he stated that "the best argument against democracy is a ten minute conversation with the average voter." There is a pox on both our houses and even the best of the Democrats are 'separate but [not] equal' Dixiecrats who represent the ghost of Jim Crow. Just Google it or see See "Untangling Barack Obama's audacious mumbo jumbo," by John P. Mortimer, at http://ebar.com/common/inc/article_print.php?sec=guest_op&article=73 . Also see http://www.outrightusa.org/ And see
http://outrightlibertarians.blogspot.com/2006/11/obama-doesnt-get-civil-l iberty.html.
Even the UK is onto this deception but the "liberal press" in the US uses silence as an exercise in collaboration to pull the wool over people's eyes.
See http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/latest.htm for December 3, 2006. Wake up.
Posted by: JP on 12/09/06 at 1:27 PM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
So sad; there is so little happiness in this world that denying it to two people who want to be together is tragic. I am quite heterosexual, so no desire to emulate their sort of union, but quite happy for two to share their lives in peace; and the child would benefit from having two people looking after it. A same-sex union has enough problems without Mrs. Grundy adding more sorrows.
Posted by: AlecJ on 12/08/06 at 2:19 PM