MoJo Blog

« Thank You, Molly Ivins | Blog Index | Bush Says, "There's Some Racial Insensitivity Going Around? Count Me In!" »

Some Day, Hipsters Will Wear "Biden '08" T-Shirts as an Ironic Statement

Want a summary of this Joe Biden/Barack Obama situation? You'll find one below; it doubles as a timeline of the Biden campaign, start to finish.

First, Biden gave a crazy interview to the NY Observer in which he said several things about several people. He may have set the record for most scorn and most Fluffernutter references (one) in any interview ever. "I don’t think John Edwards knows what the heck he is talking about," he said, beginning a long tirade about John Edwards' lack of sophistication on the war. "John Edwards wants you and all the Democrats to think, 'I want us out of there,' but when you come back and you say, 'O.K., John, what about the chaos that will ensue? Do we have any interest, John, left in the region?' Well, John will have to answer yes or no. If he says yes, what are they? What are those interests, John? How do you protect those interests, John, if you are completely withdrawn?... So all this stuff is like so much Fluffernutter out there." (There it is!)

Hillary Clinton's position on Iraq would be "nothing but disaster," Biden said, and even though "everyone in the world knows her... she can't break out of 30 percent for a choice for Democrats? Where do you want to be? Do you want to be in a place where 100 percent of the Democrats know you? They’ve looked at you for the last three years. And four out of 10 is the max you can get?"

But a very special kind of blabbering was reserved for Barack Obama and black presidential candidates. "You got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy... I mean, that's a storybook, man." And that's where Biden's comments leave the realm of Democratic rival-bashing and enter some pretty touchy territory.

Following the interview, Biden immediately started backtracking, telling reporters that even though he was "quoted accurately" they should "call Senator Obama. He knew what I meant by it." (He added, "Barack Obama is probably the most exciting candidate that the Democratic or Republican party has produced at least since I’ve been around.")

Reporters then found Obama, who was conciliatory. "I didn’t take it personally and I don’t think he intended to offend."

But later that day Obama released a statement that said, "I didn’t take Senator Biden’s comments personally, but obviously they were historically inaccurate... African-American presidential candidates like Jesse Jackson, Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun and Al Sharpton gave a voice to many important issues through their campaigns, and no one would call them inarticulate."

Reporters pressed Biden on what the word "clean" meant. Biden responded, "[Obama] understood exactly what I meant... And I have no doubt that Jesse Jackson and every other black leader — Al Sharpton and the rest — will know exactly what I meant."

So reporters went to Jesse Jackson, and whoops: "I am not sure what he means — ask him to explain what he meant." Jackson pointed out that when both Jackson and Biden ran for president (in 1988), Jackson lasted longer and got more votes. Al Sharpton, god bless him, pointed out that he bathes every day.

Eventually, audio of Biden's comments to the Observer became available and the inevitable arguments over whether the transcription should have included an extra comma or period, thus mitigating the insensitivity of Biden's comments, began. And that was how Joe Biden doomed himself to a lifetime of frustrated irrelevancy in the Senate.

Posted by Jonathan Stein on 02/01/07 at 6:38 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

Biden's having facilitated the soul-murder of Professor Anita Hill doesn't help his case.

Posted by: Diane on 02/01/07 at 7:30 AM

Uhoh! Crazy Biden's at it again! So glad his handlers weren't around to curb his impulses. We need to weed out the unqualified as quickly as we can.

P.S. - Barack Obama, once again you have shown the grace and tact that so few others out there possess. I may not agree with all of your politics, but you got my vote.

Posted by: Paul on 02/01/07 at 8:48 AM

Anyone else think Biden was a little tipsy when he made the comments? Shouldn't politicians be suspicious of reporters trying to buy them drinks?

Posted by: Tom on 02/01/07 at 8:54 AM

Hey, here's an examination of the comment which suggests that it might have been a mis-quote... it has a link to the audio of the comment, so everyone can judge for themselves what he meant:

http://www.economist.com/debate/democracyinamerica/
2007/01/joe_biden_moron_racist_or_poor.cfm

Posted by: Paul on 02/01/07 at 9:12 AM

For some people its DWIs, others its draft dodging -- but with me its racist slips.

I actually registered republican in 00 for McCain, that contrarian, only to hear, in horror, him call Asians "gooks."

Press gave him a pass
(see link: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/hongop.shtml)
but I didn't. For me it's a great lil litmus test.

Posted by: supereffer on 02/02/07 at 1:10 PM

Do all of you hold yourselves to the same standards you place on our leaders?

Lighten up. We've got a long way to go before we hit the big time.

Posted by: Joe on 02/02/07 at 3:15 PM

Biden ,at best is a twerp;at worst,he is ticking time bomb for the DP.The RP should love about now.
While he is to be respected in some areas,in others he lacks front runner skills and leadership immagination necessary for a high level position. I think we have had enough unimaginative and dumb downed leadship to last a life time.

Posted by: Gregory Thomas on 02/02/07 at 6:14 PM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote: The testimony was a complete mess. ... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote: Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul... [more]

Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote: Kirilovslogic, Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th... [more]

NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote: Sneezer, First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is... [more]

MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote: You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani... [more]

Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote: Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote: The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ... [more]

Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote: I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t... [more]

White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote: It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment.... [more]

Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Yes, Dan.... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















Charlie and Sarah

Drill, Baby, Drill

Torches and Pitchforks

Quote of the Day


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS