« Increase in STD Vaccines Signals Trouble for Abstinence Industry | Blog Index | Guess Who's Coming to the GOP Fundraiser? »
John McCain Might as Well be Gay
Asked if they'd be willing to vote for a "generally well-qualified" candidate with the following characteristics, here's how Americans responded in a Feb. 9-11 Gallup poll.
Black 94%
Jewish 92%
A woman 88%
Hispanic 87%
Mormon 72%
Married for third time 67%
72 years of age 57%
A homosexual 55%
An atheist 45%
Several things stand out. First, Americans are much more tolerant of inherent characteristics (race, sex) than of things they view as a candidate's choice (religion, sexual orientation, marriage tendencies), which means we've moved past racism to simple prejudice. Take that for what it's worth.
Also, John McCain is old -- so old that his age puts him at the same disadvantage as a gay candidate for president, the very idea of which must horrify a huge portion of our (obviously) homophobic electorate and would galvanize the religious right. I suspect we should take these numbers with a grain of salt, but... wow.
(H/T Crooks and Liars)
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 02/21/07 at 12:40 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
"which means we've moved past racism to simple prejudice"..well on this planet that means we might have reached an ethereal plateau of modest hope. Take THAT for what it means.
Is that the good news or bad?
GOOD
Posted by: epaminondas on 02/21/07 at 3:12 PM
But what does it mean if you are a black, Jewish woman or a 72 yr old gay Latino? I'm so confoozled.
Posted by: Deacon on 02/21/07 at 4:13 PM
Being homophobic is just as bad and the same as being a racist. We have a long way to go. Do not underestimate the hardship of the struggle.
Posted by: John Long on 02/22/07 at 6:31 AM
Social psychology has known for years that espousing an attitude does not predict actually behaving in accordance with that attitude. Therefore to treat these poll results as actual predictors of voter behavior is silly. Several studies have been conducted of late (starting with a seminal University of Michigan study conducted in the late 1990s) in which identical resumes were circulated to companies. The resumes differed only in the names written at the top (the credentials were identical). One set of resumes contained stereotypically black names (Tyrone, LaShaunda, etc.) while the other set contained more standard, biblically derived "white" names (John, Marc, Mary, etc.). Predictably, the employers were overwhelmingly more likely to offer interviews or offer positions outright to the Marc's and Mary's than the Tyrone's and LaShaunda's, despite their identical qualifications. Employers' self-reported attitudes toward race and hiring in no way predicted their actual behaviors.
Similarly, there is no reason to believe that 94% of Americans claiming they would vote for a qualified black candidate would actually predict voter behavior. Polls like this may give us hope that America is moving towards meritocracy, but they are hardly evidence that such a state has been achieved.
Posted by: Matthew T. Jameson on 02/22/07 at 7:23 AM
ARCHIVE
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
January 21, 2007 - January 27, 2007
January 14, 2007 - January 20, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote:
The testimony was a complete mess. ...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote:
Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul...
[more]
Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote:
Kirilovslogic,
Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th...
[more]
NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote:
Sneezer,
First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is...
[more]
MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani...
[more]
Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote:
Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co...
[more]
Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote:
The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ...
[more]
Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote:
I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t...
[more]
White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote:
It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment....
[more]
Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Yes, Dan....
[more]
Movable Type 3.33
what do all you hyper-religious evangel'merican types have against us godless commies? at least we rest assured that 150 years ago this poll would have revealed:
Creationist 99%
Evolutionist 1%
ha! you so silly. who da fundamentalist/radical/extremist now?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Europe_belief_in_god.png
Posted by: karl on 02/21/07 at 1:38 PM