MoJo Blog

« Increase in STD Vaccines Signals Trouble for Abstinence Industry | Blog Index | Guess Who's Coming to the GOP Fundraiser? »

John McCain Might as Well be Gay

Asked if they'd be willing to vote for a "generally well-qualified" candidate with the following characteristics, here's how Americans responded in a Feb. 9-11 Gallup poll.

Black 94%
Jewish 92%
A woman 88%
Hispanic 87%
Mormon 72%
Married for third time 67%
72 years of age 57%
A homosexual 55%
An atheist 45%

Several things stand out. First, Americans are much more tolerant of inherent characteristics (race, sex) than of things they view as a candidate's choice (religion, sexual orientation, marriage tendencies), which means we've moved past racism to simple prejudice. Take that for what it's worth.

Also, John McCain is old -- so old that his age puts him at the same disadvantage as a gay candidate for president, the very idea of which must horrify a huge portion of our (obviously) homophobic electorate and would galvanize the religious right. I suspect we should take these numbers with a grain of salt, but... wow.

(H/T Crooks and Liars)

Posted by Jonathan Stein on 02/21/07 at 12:40 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |



Comments

what do all you hyper-religious evangel'merican types have against us godless commies? at least we rest assured that 150 years ago this poll would have revealed:

Creationist 99%
Evolutionist 1%

ha! you so silly. who da fundamentalist/radical/extremist now?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Europe_belief_in_god.png

Posted by: karl on 02/21/07 at 1:38 PM

"which means we've moved past racism to simple prejudice"..well on this planet that means we might have reached an ethereal plateau of modest hope. Take THAT for what it means.

Is that the good news or bad?

GOOD

Posted by: epaminondas on 02/21/07 at 3:12 PM

But what does it mean if you are a black, Jewish woman or a 72 yr old gay Latino? I'm so confoozled.

Posted by: Deacon on 02/21/07 at 4:13 PM

Being homophobic is just as bad and the same as being a racist. We have a long way to go. Do not underestimate the hardship of the struggle.

Posted by: John Long on 02/22/07 at 6:31 AM

Social psychology has known for years that espousing an attitude does not predict actually behaving in accordance with that attitude. Therefore to treat these poll results as actual predictors of voter behavior is silly. Several studies have been conducted of late (starting with a seminal University of Michigan study conducted in the late 1990s) in which identical resumes were circulated to companies. The resumes differed only in the names written at the top (the credentials were identical). One set of resumes contained stereotypically black names (Tyrone, LaShaunda, etc.) while the other set contained more standard, biblically derived "white" names (John, Marc, Mary, etc.). Predictably, the employers were overwhelmingly more likely to offer interviews or offer positions outright to the Marc's and Mary's than the Tyrone's and LaShaunda's, despite their identical qualifications. Employers' self-reported attitudes toward race and hiring in no way predicted their actual behaviors.

Similarly, there is no reason to believe that 94% of Americans claiming they would vote for a qualified black candidate would actually predict voter behavior. Polls like this may give us hope that America is moving towards meritocracy, but they are hardly evidence that such a state has been achieved.

Posted by: Matthew T. Jameson on 02/22/07 at 7:23 AM

Post a comment





 

RECENT COMMENTS

The Petraeus/Crocker Report: It's Crocker Time! (Part Three) (1)
Ames Tideman wrote: The testimony was a complete mess. ... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Smarter (4)
MoonDragon wrote: Can we bias any study to show a tendency for desired resul... [more]

Protesters in Berkeley: Up a Tree and Fenced In (13)
Brian K wrote: Kirilovslogic, Wow. Im not talking about sucking up to th... [more]

NRA Offers Free Memberships to Soldiers (Step Up, Costco) (17)
Brian K wrote: Sneezer, First of all it is NOT his "topic sentance" it is... [more]

MoveOn, Anbar, and Lantos: Final Thoughts on the Petraeus and Crocker Hearing (1)
Eric Ferguson wrote: You're not too deep in the weeds on that point about Irani... [more]

Chuck Hagel, Next SecDef? (4)
bob t wrote: Wes Clark(Catholic) would be my first choice, but Hagel co... [more]

Scientific Proof That Liberals Are Not Smarter (4)
Eric Ferguson wrote: The message intended was a good one, because Petraeus has ... [more]

Happy Anniversary, Katrina Victims! You Could Celebrate With Cash if You Weren't So Unscrupulous (5)
jah wrote: I was annoyed by your title, but i understand and relate t... [more]

White House Advisor Appears to Taunt Bin Laden (10)
Jaime Galarza wrote: It reminds me of the now infamous "Bring them on" comment.... [more]

Donald Rumsfeld: Not Done Lying! (3)
Jonathan Stein wrote: Yes, Dan.... [more]

XML RSS Feed

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2007 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS