« GAO Report Now Available: Iraqi Gov't Meets 3 of 18 Benchmarks | Blog Index | Afghan Women Lack Rights and Access to Courts »
And They're Off!
Following on Jonathan's summary of the GAO report findings, I attended the Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting this afternoon in the Dirksen Senate Office Building. Senator Kerry presided over the meeting, joined by colleagues Lugar, Feingold, and Hagel, among others. Testifying was U.S. Comptroller General David M. Walker, who led GAO staff in preparing the report.
Microphones continually cut out as the senators expressed their frustration with how poorly things are going in Iraq. The question was put to Walker repeatedly of whether recent progress in Anbar province would be sustainable in the absence of U.S. troops. The general feeling appeared to be no. Walker did not argue the point.
It was striking how uniform the senators were in their pessimism. Only Norm Coleman, Republican of Minnesota, challenged Walker on his findings. Coleman, who had just returned from Baghdad after spending the weekend with General Petraeus, said that the general had shown him data suggesting the number of enemy attacks declined during the month of August. Kerry interrupted, pointing out that, historically, the month of August is usually quiet. Coleman responded that the numbers he had seen in Baghdad were undeniable and compensated for any seasonal fluctuation in insurgent activity. Walker admitted that he had not seen the numbers for August (despite requesting them), but that anecdotal information suggested that there was no discernible downturn in the overall number of attacks.
Aside from Coleman, however, the senators did not argue against GAO's findings. If anything, they pushed Walker further. Lugar said that, by all appearances, the Iraqis don't seem to want to be part of a unified Iraq. If true, he said, "then we have an awesome problem." Later, Hagel asked whether the Iraqi government could be described as functional, whether it could defend, support, and govern itself. Walker's response: "I think I would have to say it's dysfunctional. The government is dysfunctional."
It was then that I saw what appeared to be an Iraqi diplomat, who had been sitting quietly in the back of the room, get up and leave.
More hearings on the GAO report tomorrow...
Posted by Bruce Falconer on 09/04/07 at 1:37 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
What? Norm Coleman and John Sununu aren't exactly what I'd call "the Senate's high-profile Republican war critics." Hagel is the only one to criticize with any force. Gordon Smith called it "criminal." But characterizing Coleman and Sununu as "high-profile war critics" isn't quite accurate.
Posted by: Chris Yang on 09/04/07 at 10:07 PM
I would argue that any Republican who criticizes the war automatically becomes high-profile. Admittedly, Coleman and Sununu aren't as high-profile as Hagel, Lugar, or in the House, Walter Jones. And I'll acknowledge that their criticisms are a part of their election year politics. But the fact remains that sitting on the Foreign Relations Committee seems to make Republicans far more likely to attack the way the Bush Administration has handled the war, which is the likely upshot of have more knowledge of that handling.
Posted by: Jonathan Stein on 09/05/07 at 7:00 AM
ARCHIVE
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007
February 11, 2007 - February 17, 2007
February 4, 2007 - February 10, 2007
January 28, 2007 - February 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Dobson Slams Fred Thompson in Private Email (2)
"Goober" wrote:
No Jon, that leaves RON PAUL.
Dobson has a big mouth, like...
[more]
Burma: Saffron Flames Rage Against the Machine (1)
gvc wrote:
["Too bad the US' foreign policies in Asia are not consist...
[more]
Republicans Can't Find the Cash to Campaign (2)
gvc wrote:
Jonathan, I don't think all the necessary information is t...
[more]
U.S. Always Outsourcing, More Contractors Than U.S. Troops in Iraq (8)
gvc wrote:
I thought the actual details of this had already been poin...
[more]
College Students: You've Been F#%'D! (7)
gvc wrote:
I've read quite a bit of Ursula K, but to be honest, I alw...
[more]
Secretary of Defense to Ask for $180 Billion for Iraq, Afghanistan Wars (4)
Mildred wrote:
Vote third party. Vote green. ...
[more]
Nixon Hated the Jews: Even More Evidence (2)
Ira wrote:
Who cares. The Jews hate Christians and Muslims. Just read...
[more]
Sunni Insurgents Launch Assassination Campaign (3)
youtoob wrote:
bookworm, that didn't even make sense!...
[more]
"Stop Hillary Clinton" Now the Largest Political Facebook Group (18)
Stephen Fox wrote:
After everything is said and done in this election, a few ...
[more]
Hilarious Website of the Week: Cops Bitching About Other Cops (5)
JT Barrie wrote:
The problem is that police know how ridiculous their own...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


I've been to Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings in the past, and it is amazing how many of the Senate's high-profile Republican war critics are on it. Hagel is the loudest and most well-known, but there is also Norm Coleman, Dick Lugar, George Voinovich, and John Sununu. They have all, with varying degrees of forcefulness, attacked the Bush war plan.
I find it interesting that those Republican senators with the most access to information about the war are the ones most likely to bail on it.
Posted by: Jonathan Stein on 09/04/07 at 2:25 PM