«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Give the Nuclear Power Industry Credit for Creativity
Nuclear energy companies, salivating over the prospect of millions of dollars in new federal subsidies, are eager to launch a construction boom of new power plants. In the past, nuclear power plant construction has been hampered by such nettlesome things as construction permits and public hearings on the construction's environmental impact. To fix that problem, Bloomberg reports, the Nuclear Energy Institute successfully lobbied federal regulators to redefine what they meant by "construction."
Now, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says such bulldozer-heavy activities as excavation, road building, and the erection of new cooling towers no longer count as construction under permitting rules. The change comes over protests from the agency's own environmental oversight official, who believes that the change will allow 90 percent of the environmental impact of new power plants to escape federal oversight.
It took the NRC 11 years to come up with new rules for drug-testing plant workers, but the new industry-friendly construction reg sailed through in a mere six months. Of course, the industry had a ringer in the regulatory agency. One of the NRC commissioners who voted for the new regs, Jeffrey Merrifield, cast his vote while looking for a new job. He now works for a company that builds nuclear power plants.
(H/T Center for Media and Democracy)
Comments
So sad that greed manages to trump respect for our environment every time.
I'm sure the nuclear power lobby is pushing so hard because it knows we're so close to not needing it.
Once we have it we're in their clutches for another 50 years.
Say it Ain't So!!!!
Jeffrey Merrifield?!?!
A CLINTON Administration Appointee..?!?!
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization/commission/former-commissioners/merrifield.html
Posted by: Smart and Fearless Research on 10/08/07 at 12:03 PM Respond
drug and vodka testing should have been done at chernobyl.
Dr.Q
Posted by: Dr.Q on 10/08/07 at 4:31 PM Respond
Thanks for the link to the article from The Baltimore Sun, quite unusual, it seems, in today's world of corporate controlled media.
Accidents, of whatever kind, in a nuclear facility is not something we can dismiss lightly, and they will occur again as they have in the past. I wish all of us, good luck!
Posted by: St Ann on 10/09/07 at 3:48 AM Respond
The nuclear industry needed this, lifting some restrictions off the heaps that nuclear plants need to get through actually helps the environment. Do you want 10 train cars of ash a day from every 1000MW coal plant, or one truckload of nuclear waste per year?
And on the topic of accidents, what’s scarier: solid nuclear waste being contained in an nearly indestructible container, or heavy metals slowly seeping into our water table?
Nuclear energy is the most environmental friendly and promising energy source for the future.
Posted by: B@wisc on 10/09/07 at 8:12 AM Respond
This is just another reason to reduce the power of industry by working toward public financing of campaigns.
It is my hope that Mother Jones will help in a very aggressive manner urge our legislators and educate our grass roots that this is crucial. We are at a juncture where average people are finding it difficult to be certain of effective representation due to the dependency of our legislators on contributions generously provided by those special interests.
Posted by: Jerome J. Weiss on 10/09/07 at 11:11 AM Respond
This is just another reason to reduce the power of industry by working toward public financing of campaigns.
It is my hope that Mother Jones will help in a very aggressive manner urge our legislators and educate our grass roots that this is crucial. We are at a juncture where average people are finding it difficult to be certain of effective representation due to the dependency of our legislators on contributions generously provided by those special interests.
Posted by: Jerome J. Weiss on 10/09/07 at 11:11 AM Respond
I hope MJ will educate her readers to all the green-hype produced by nuclear industry and its advocates.
A nuclear power accident causes death and slow death by cancer. Coal, gas or oil are also destructive to health and environment. Research into energy sources has hardly tapped into what is possible with sun, wind, water etc.
Effects of Chernobyl are still being felt in the Ukraine - although the media doesn't like to report it. I know I lived there. A Chernobyl can also occur in the US - can anyone absolutely guarantee it won't occur? No, just I cannot say for sure it will occur. So, why gamble with the future?
Posted by: St Ann on 10/09/07 at 12:17 PM Respond
The Luddites Were Right!!
Restore Sanity to the World!!
SMASH The Machines!!
ALL The Machines, starting with all these stupid computers hooked up to the internet!
Posted by: General Ned Ludd on 10/09/07 at 2:26 PM Respond
Wow! General Ludd, a bit extreme? Which era of the past is most appealing to you, that of the Neanderthals? Even the Austrolopithecines used tools.
Posted by: St Ann on 10/10/07 at 2:51 PM Respond
The Age of the Army of Redressers.
Read up on them.
You'll probably want to enlist.
Posted by: General Ned Ludd on 10/10/07 at 3:07 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Follow Up on Barack Obama's "Muslim Problem" (39)
Tariq wrote:
Nooneinspecfic, you understand why the Moslems throughout ...
[more]
Syriana: Newly Announced Israel-Syria Peace Talks Run Against Grain of Washington's Anti-Engagement Policy (12)
bozhidar bob balkas wrote:
ashkenazim say, We'll give land for peace. how many lies c...
[more]
Just as Ted Kennedy Endorses Obama, RNC Discovers—Omigod!—EMK Is a Liberal (20)
Black History wrote:
Again Sen Obama shows interest in selling to private corp...
[more]
On the Siegelman Scandal, Rove Offers a Very Suspicious Non-Denial Denial (1)
capt - Hussein wrote:
(A) He did do something like that. Or, (B) he doesn't reme...
[more]
McCain Finally Renounces Hagee; What About Parsley? (10)
USS Liberty Vet wrote:
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the “Conscience of the Senate.”...
[more]
McCain Throws Himself Into the Briar Patch...Some More (1)
USS Liberty Vet wrote:
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is the “Conscience of the Senate.”...
[more]
National Reconciliation is Impossible, Say Iraqi Leaders (3)
شباب ليبيا wrote:
The subject of a very wonderful and distinct
I thank you...
[more]
Obama in Iowa: On His Way, But Not Without Hurdles (27)
show me wrote:
Well, if Mother Jones is backing Obama all is lost. Does a...
[more]
Fred Thompson Gets Skewered, SNL-Style (1)
شباب ليبيا wrote:
The subject of a very wonderful and distinct
I thank you...
[more]
Finally, McCain Repudiates Rev. Parsley, His Anti-Islam "Moral Compass" (56)
Trollstein wrote:
"we don't care about the past, we are in the present march...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


Posted by: weee on 10/08/07 at 11:54 AM Respond