«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Rudy Giuliani's Appearance Before the Value Voters: A Mixed Bag
Rudy Giuliani just faced his toughest crowd of the campaign to date. After some waffling early in the campaign, Giuliani has been honest about his pro-choice and pro-gay rights beliefs. In so doing, he's written off the folks who are likely to attend the Family Research Council's Washington Briefing (aka the Value Voters Summit).
So how did Rudy handle the situation? Unimpressively. He spent as much time apologizing for not pandering to the crowd on abortion and gay rights as he did making the case for why he ought to be the next president of the United States. Let's dig in.
Rudy started by saying, "I've come here to speak to you about our shared values and our shared goals. What unites us is far greater than what divides us." Any suspicion that he would ignore the tension between his positions and the crowd's by raving about "Islamic fascism" went out the window immediately.
Early in the speech, he said, "Christians and Christianity are all about inclusiveness." He went on to explain the early Christians drew people to the faith by accepting doubters, sinners, and outcasts. There are two reasons why this is a dicey line of rhetoric. First, Rudy explaining Christian history to some of America's most devout Christians is kind of insane. In addition to sounding unauthentic, he had no room for error. Second, it's unclear if he was trying to say that the crowd here ought to accept him (as a candidate that doesn't "check their boxes"), or that the crowd here ought to accept gays, immigrants, and other folks that these Christians don't like so much. Either way, he's telling these folks how to improve themselves, which is a bit presumptuous, no?
Giuliani explained that because he too often finds himself failing his moral and religious beliefs, he is reluctant to hold himself up as a model of faith. And that he comes from a background that keeps religion out of public life. Despite that, he said, "You have nothing to fear from me." That's a pretty stunning statement for any presidential candidate to make.
Few campaigns are won on the defensive, but that's where Rudy found himself. "Isn't it better that I tell you what I really believe," he said, "than to change all my positions to fit the prevailing wind?" It isn't leadership in any meaningful sense to pander, he explained, and so, if you'll forgive him, he's not going to pander to you. But don't write him off as a result. "Ronald Reagan said, 'My 80 percent friend is not my 100 percent enemy,'" Rudy pointed out. To rephrase that: "I know we don't agree 20 percent of the time, but please don't hate me as a result." The unspoken but universally acknowledged truth here is that the 20 percent on which Rudy and the crowd disagree are the 20 percent that are most important to the crowd.
Giuliani can talk about his support for increasing adoptions, for decreasing abortions, for appointing strict constructionist judges, he can say things like, "My belief in God and reliance on his guidance is at the core of who I am," and he can talk on and on about how he will always be honest if not perfect on the issues, but in the end none of that is going to be good enough. Running for president doesn't mean convincing the American voting public to vote for you. It means convincing the dozens, if not hundreds, of single-issue groups that make up the American voting public to vote for you. And this is one Rudy's just not going to get.
The folks here have been voting in a straw poll all weekend. They'll announce the winner after the presumptive favorite, Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, speaks this afternoon. I, of course, will be here.
Do I get combat pay for this?
Update: The good news: no phone call.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 10/20/07 at 5:58 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Technorati Tags: politics | president | republican | values voters | rudy giuliani | abortion | gays | christians | religious right
Comments
I hear you, Jonathan, but I am glad he didn't pretend to havea problem with gays to make them happy. It's better than someone like a Larry Craig signing a Defense of Marriage bill while reaching for his Preparation H.
Posted by: Paul Miller on 10/20/07 at 8:15 AM
look. If Rudi (first name basis, like "Senator" Hillary) hadn't happened to have 'been there (done that)', in the neighborhood on 9/11, photo ops and what not, or dissed degenerate arch-heritik Maplethorpe and, like a good choirboy that hasn't even been f***** by the priest yet, ... would anyone, even stauch Viermacht Busshes even have heard of Hizzonor by now?
-Arf arf.
Posted by: JunkYardBlueDogJB on 10/21/07 at 1:51 AM
ARCHIVE
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007
March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007
February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Superdome Redux, San Diego Style (8)
Elizabeth wrote:
Carlos, your comment is uncalled for. Watch it or you'll g...
[more]
Either Mike Huckabee is Really Bad at Math, or He Has His Facts Wrong (1)
yowoyemi wrote:
Being clegy did not stop them from enslaving Native Americ...
[more]
Title IX--35 Years Old And Still Misunderstood (10)
Goober wrote:
irishgawdess: "Enjoy your time kicking back and living off...
[more]
The Blackwater Suit You've Never Read About (1)
Dorey wrote:
He seems to be a bit of a crackpot, but, heck, his heart i...
[more]
Kurdish Guerrillas Are Out of Control, and We're Making it Worse (2)
Jonathan Stein wrote:
Here's what the New York Times says about PKK vs. PJAK:
"...
[more]
Obama and McClurkin: Two for Which Road? (5)
August Bebel wrote:
Gays are petite bourgeoisie not progressives according to...
[more]
God Bless You, Jonathan Stein (1)
Circe wrote:
I know most of you haveprobably read this, still fun thoug...
[more]
That's Why It's Called the Nobel, Not the Noble (12)
Geri wrote:
Fact Checker, you just proved Dr. Watson's point that Afri...
[more]
The Onion Gets It Right Again (3)
kirkbrew wrote:
Karl – Can not disagree more. The Neo-cons WANT people to...
[more]
Black Macho and the Myth of the Super Predator: The PTSD connection (19)
lunanoire wrote:
Scott
I commend you for your achievements, but I also wond...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
Adelson Questioned by Israeli Detectives As Part of Olmert Bribery Probe
McCain Confuses Voters (and Himself?) on Spending Cuts
Brent Scowcroft on the Cuba Embargo: "It Doesn't Do Anything"
Which Dictators Are Too Awful?
Obama Goes General
Clinton Campaign Keeps On Pushing Bogus Rationale
More on McCain's Climate Change Speech Today
China Outlaws Pringles and Fanta
The Weird McCain-Dictator Connection