«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Clinton Fake Question "Scandal": A Report From the Scene

One of the "major" news stories on the presidential campaigns the last few days has been Hillary Clinton's mini-scandal over a planted question at a campaign event in Newton, IA. As Michael Scherer points out in Salon, a planted question is really just par for the course in a political campaign season captured, top to bottom, by artifice.
I was at the event in Newton. And the event there perfectly illustrates the fakery that composes every event for a major candidate. Believe me, it goes well beyond just one planted question. Follow me on a tour of a presidential campaign event, after the jump.
Hundreds of attendees, 30-40 members of the media, and a phalanx of staffers descended on the biodeisel facility outside Newton, IA, around 11 am. The media members present represented every major TV network and cable news station, most if not all of the major papers, the occasional magazine, and even some foreign countries. Clinton attracts larger crowds and more media than almost any other candidate, and her events are tightly scripted and professionally run. Staffers are better dressed than their counterparts on other campaigns, with more expensive suits, more stylish haircuts, and fancier shoes. Frankly—and it's not clear how this is possible—they are better looking.
Before Clinton's speech in Newton, the press was handed hard hats and protective goggles and herded into the biodiesel plant, eventually stationed behind several of the zip cord barriers used in airport lines. A representative from the plant held up a vial of yellow liquid, identifying it as biodiesel. She explained that the plant turned soybean and other vegetable oils, as well as animal fats, into fuel usable in any diesel engine. "It smells like vegetable oil," she noted. Cameramen, uninterested in the helpful biodiesel facts, argued with Clinton's press staff and jostled one another to get three feet closer to where the candidate would eventually stand. Boom mic operators on different sides of the room held their equipment over the crowd's collective heads so they could talk to one another at a normal volume, hearing each other in their headphones.
A couple of bored employees who were actually making the plant function were hidden behind a metallic gray vat sitting on a green pump. The whole thing was hooked up to a series of tubes and a banner carrying the name of the plant's owner. Eventually, Clinton walked in with a representative of the plant, former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack, and an unidentified man in a suit. They all stood in front of the vat and banner, speaking in normal tones. The boom mic operators strained to get their mics within a few feet of Clinton, but all the other members of the press just stared at moving but soundless lips from twenty feet away. The only sound was the furious clicking of the cameras. After five minutes in which none of the principals moved more than a foot in any direction, Clinton and company moved on to another part of the plant. The media, pregnant with questions, was ushered out the way they came, dumping hard hats and goggles in a bin on the way out.
The photo-op was followed by Clinton's speech, which took place in a hall next door to the plant. Her speech presented the opportunity to get a count of who and what was in the room: eleven video cameras, four or five sound men, and seven photographers who eventually became so bored that they took photos of one another taking photos of Clinton. One elderly woman in the audience was knitting while listening to the senator speak, a fact so remarkable that a photographer with a 8-inch lens crouched no more than two feet from her face and took 45 seconds worth of photos.
After the event, Clinton shook hands and signed autographs and then disappeared. The press didn't get to ask a single question, which means the Clinton campaign managed to ask one more question of itself than the media was able to ask.
The point is this: a campaign event for a candidate of Clinton's prominence is stage-managed from beginning to end. At all times, the members of the press are kept from the candidate at a distance of the campaign's choosing; starved of content, they take whatever photo opportunities the campaign gives them. The candidate herself speaks in front of giant signs of the campaign's creation, in lighting of the campaign's design, and in, let's not forget, a location of the campaign's choosing. And when the speech is over and it is time to take questions from the crowd, Clinton, like every politician, gives answers that bear little relevance to the questions asked and are more or less vessels for campaign talking points.
Artifice is everywhere. One fake question is a drop in the bucket.

Leave a Comment »
Posted by Jonathan Stein on 11/14/07 at 7:04 AM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
Billary's not the only one out
there trying to 'game' the public, if you remember back to the BushCo whirlwind tour,
they were hand-picking who
could enter etc. We definitely
live in 'interesting times'
when elections and representation really don't seem to be a good reflection
of the voice of the public anymore, I'll bet you not one
person in attendance was
permitted/motivated to speak
up against any further increase in the national debt,
for example, nor would we
see someone like Hillary
actually get their fingers
dirty trying to make a batch
of ethanol, nor would they
be able to really do something
like insulate a house, or,
or, for that matter, change
a stupid light bulb.
This entire 'business' has
gone runaway, you've got
your Glenn Becks out there
24/7 repeating and repeating
and repeating the same old
propaganda, too bad our
government couldn't go
'unplugged' for a while,
because it'd probably save
us not only billions of
dollars but billions of tons
of CO2 as well. Yes, politicians are gross emitters
in that regard...teddy kennedy
could probably power the entire east coast if he set up
a podium in front of one of
those windmills and started
reciting speeches. Of course
that might destabilize
the earth's orbit, too...it's
unsafe to give all of those
at once, you know. Put
Billary's microphone inside
a catalytic converter, that
way no harmful emissions can
get out! LOLOL
Posted by: Bert on 11/14/07 at 12:59 PM Respond
Hillary's greatest enemy is her own party.
The frontrunner - the best chance ever to insure that a Republican or Libertarian will not reign
in the Oval Office for another destructive 4 years - is being torn asunder by "Democrats".
We've reached an emergency situation in the Executive. One that requires fast fixing.
And the one lined up to do just that is being submarined by jealous blabbermouths
Posted by: Wil Burns on 11/14/07 at 1:39 PM Respond
"Hillary's greatest enemy is her own party." Absolutely! Up here in Canada, the federal Liberals had the chance last year to select an accomplished, articulate individual (there were several available) as their leader. Instead, they chose Mr. Wallpaper-Paste.
If the Democrats blow this, I might be forced to take Ann Coulter seriously, and that's not a happy thought.
Posted by: Bruce on 11/14/07 at 7:48 PM Respond
If we can't question the frontrunner, what is the point of the primary season? We in Iowa are taking this very seriously. After enduring more than eight months of campaigning, we are just BEGINNING to form set preferences; up until now, it's all been trying the candidates on for size.
What have many Iowans found in this lengthy campaign? Hillary doesn't fit. The sort of orchestrated, no-access campaigning does not sit well with Iowans, who are used to having the candidates eating cookies in their front room. We are trying (very hard) to accept that this type of campaigning isn't possible this time around, but we cannot accept town hall meetings that are not open to any question, or, worse yet, are dominated by planted questions that do not represent our concerns at all and an over-managed candidate surrounded by suits and scripts.
Posted by: Amanda on 11/15/07 at 6:41 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
April 15, 2007 - April 21, 2007
April 8, 2007 - April 14, 2007
March 25, 2007 - March 31, 2007
March 18, 2007 - March 24, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Clinton Fake Question "Scandal": A Report From the Scene (4)
Amanda wrote:
If we can't question the frontrunner, what is the point of...
[more]
The Conjugal Classroom (18)
Trey wrote:
Gee Debra,
We've all made some good points here, and you ...
[more]
IslamoHorowitzism Awareness Week (26)
Frank wrote:
David Horowitz is a idiot Give my break....
[more]
Thompson's Fancy Footwork Wins Him Right-To-Life Crown (5)
JT Barrie wrote:
Fred is following the footsteps of radical Islam and fund...
[more]
Turkey, Iraq: Border Trade to the Rescue? (4)
Melik wrote:
Why can?t the Turks and Turkey migrate into the 21st Centu...
[more]
Elliot Spitzer Drops Plan To Issue Drivers' Licenses To Illegal Immigrants (Boy, I'll Bet Hillary's Pissed) (15)
Paul Miller wrote:
Nancy, be glad we live in America. Your pious attitude al...
[more]
Stupid in the Eye of the Beholder: The Human Genome and Racial Difference (2)
The Die Hard wrote:
Actually, we share pretty much 99% of our DNA with chimpan...
[more]
Rudy Giuliani Tells Those Darn Kids If You Don't Vote, "It's Your Fault" (20)
ava wrote:
Rudy winning the nomination would make an easy election fo...
[more]
The Real Reason Richard Mellon Scaife Has Embraced Bill Clinton? (4)
Paul wrote:
Even more reason not to vote for Clinton. She's seeking sp...
[more]
Branding "Progressive" in the Midwest — Your Thoughts? (3)
Paul Miller wrote:
What's the problem here? Finally the Left tries a little ...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
McCain & Co. Find New Ways to Circumvent Campaign Finance Laws McCain Wrote
Will Trouble in Afghanistan Become a Tough Campaign Issue for McCain?
MoJo Convo: Iran Panic? A Follow Up Question for the Experts
Blogger Brian Beutler Shot, Expected to Make Full Recovery
Video: DNC Hammers McCain on Economic Double Talk
McCain Denies Ever Saying He Lacks Expertise on Economy
Report: Interrogation Instructors at Gitmo Taught Communist Tactics from 1950s
One More Clinton Campaign Post-Mortem: No Hierarchy, No Trust, No Comity
How to Think about Immunity