«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Start Snitching, Get Killed?
Here's something that those of us who decry urban mores against 'snitching' forgot to consider—witness intimidation. Imagine having to live down the block from the knuckleheads who know that you know exactly what violent thing they did:
No national statistics on crimes against witnesses exist, and minimal research has been conducted on the subject. The latest National Institute of Justice survey on record -- conducted more than a decade ago -- shows that more than half of big city prosecutors consider witness intimidation a major problem.
Colorado has $50,000 allocated to its witness protection budget. In contrast, the city of Denver spent almost $100,000 on landscaping last year.
The state, on average, spends about $1,000 per witness. That figure supposedly includes moving expenses, rent, and furniture. The federal program spends in excess of $40 million per year on witness protection.
One possible reason for the disparity is that witnesses in state cases do not get new identities, as do federal witnesses. "It's not designed to be a long-term relocation at the public's expense; it's a way to ensure the immediate safety of the witnesses," according to Peter Weir, executive director of the Colorado Department of Public Safety.
Witnesses in criminal cases get intimidated, and murdered, with alarming frequency while those of us who live lives far removed, except by the worst of luck, from crime tsk-tsk over their poor character when they choose their safety over their civic duty. It's one thing to disapprove of tolerating criminality. It's quite another to focus on landscaping when leaving brave witnesses to protect themselves, and their families, from conscienceless predators.
Leave a Comment »
Posted by Debra Dickerson on 12/17/07 at 4:07 PM | E-mail | Print | Digg | de.licio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Yahoo! MyWeb | StumbleUpon | Netscape | Google |
Comments
I am surprised that state witness protection programs do not get more funding to protect for without a reliable witness how can they justify funding for the penal institutions that are being built at a rapid pace throughout the US>
Posted by: Anon on 12/17/07 at 4:48 PM Respond
because drug war cases don't need a 'reliable' witness
any witness will do
most of the prisoners in all those institutions figure to be POWs in the drug war
Posted by: jet on 12/17/07 at 5:16 PM Respond
I think your words are right on. How can state officials expect us to help them and then leave us out for the wolves? They do not protect you once they have gotten what they want from you, they are just as bad as the criminals they are trying to "protect" you from.
Posted by: Sherri Holmes on 12/18/07 at 7:02 AM Respond
A witness to a crime is one thing, a lying snitch is another. Someone who is snitching just for fun, or snitching to save their butt, or lying about someone in the guise of snitching, that type of person should be dealt with like a rat snitch should be dealt with. We have one here in Palmer Lake, a guy who snitched out a harmless poker game at a local restaurant just to get his rocks off. What a nice guy! The poor restaurant owner lost his business over it. Now that snitch goes around all smug and giggly over it. Is that right??
Posted by: Victim of a lying snitch on 12/21/07 at 9:28 PM Respond
ARCHIVE
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
August 5, 2007 - August 11, 2007
July 29, 2007 - August 4, 2007
April 22, 2007 - April 28, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
Start Snitching, Get Killed? (4)
Victim of a lying snitch wrote:
A witness to a crime is one thing, a lying snitch is anoth...
[more]
Merry Christmas From the U.S. Military (3)
capt wrote:
Nano Bible: Entire Old Testament Written On A Pinhead
htt...
[more]
Coming Soon to Texas: A Master's Degree in Creation Science (15)
capt wrote:
"With most men, unbelief in one thing springs from blind b...
[more]
U.S.'s Dirty Work Behind Pakistani Political Crisis? (4)
Tarik Aziz wrote:
The Zionists are behind all of this. The Jews will not sto...
[more]
Rotenberg Center Blasted By Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Media After A Prankster Gets Employees to "Accidentally" Shock Kids 100 Times: Will The "School of Shock" Finally Be Closed Down? (4)
Rodney Byrd wrote:
Why should we be surprised? Our president and the conserv...
[more]
Huckabee: The Search for a Sobriquet (19)
Paul Miller wrote:
Beelzebubba...
[more]
Bill Richardson Is Pissed (3)
RT wrote:
wtf??????...
[more]
"Present" but Unaccountable: Senator Obama's Illinois Voting Record (7)
tmb wrote:
Obama is an establishment hack. Like Clinton, he's got not...
[more]
Huckabee: God Responsible for My Rise in Polls (22)
apacallyps wrote:
The Christian right (and other fed up conservatives) are s...
[more]
Crazy As They Need To Be: Circumcised Women Who Support The Practice (70)
sjp wrote:
Oops. That should read only 3% NEVER had an orgasm.
SJP...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33



RECENT ENTRIES
"Sacking" of Washington Mid East Hand Points Up Growing Rift Between Washington Ideology and Israeli Pragmatism
Harry Reid Promises Hearings on Pentagon Puppets
McCain's Surrogates Get Confused
In the Shadow of Mother's Day
At Least One Conservative Says McCain Should Renounce Rev. Parsley
John McCain, No Environmentalist
As Obama Takes Lead in Superdels, Clinton Makes Unlikely Bid for Popular Vote
The Paulites Aren't Done Yet
Starbucks' Slutty Mermaid Making Waves