«--Previous Post | Blog Index | Next Post--»
Iraq Hoarding Oil Revenue While U.S. Pays For Reconstruction

Ambassador Ryan Crocker, the top U.S. diplomat in Iraq, in testimony (.pdf) this morning before the Senate Armed Services committee, heralded increased Iraqi investment in its own reconstruction, noting $18 billion in pending budget allocations by the government in Baghdad and assuring lawmakers that "the era of U.S. funded major infrastructure projects is over." This would surely be welcome news to committee chairman Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan, if only he could bring himself to believe it.
Levin, along with Senator John Warner (R-Va.), has for months been expressing concern that the U.S. continues to shoulder the majority of Iraq's reconstruction costs at a time when Iraqi oil exports are finally producing sufficient revenue for the Baghdad government to begin shouldering a greater part of the financial burden. Last month, the senators asked the GAO to conduct a study of Iraq's oil business to determine just how much reconstruction spending should be transferred to the Iraqi side. Indeed, basic details such as total Iraqi oil revenues since 2003, how much of it has been spent on reconstruction and security, and how much the Iraqi government has deposited in banks around the world remain unclear, as do projections for expected revenues from oil exports for the coming year.
In their letter to the GAO's David Walker, Levin and Warner cite pre-Iraq invasion assurances from the Bush administration that Iraq would be able to pay for its own reconstruction. "The oil revenues of that country could bring in between 50 and 100 billion dollars over the course of the next two or three years," Paul Wolfowitz told Congress in March 2003. "We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon." This, of course, like almost every other Bush administration contention, turned out to be untrue. But today, five years after the invasion, Iraqi oil revenues may finally be reaching the levels required to finance major projects. According to Levin and Warner, Iraq is estimated to have netted $41 billion from oil exports in 2007 and is on track to make $56 billion for the current year, for a total exceeding $100 billion over two years—not exactly chump change.
This morning, in his prepared statement at the opening the Petraeus/Crocker hearing, Levin emphasized Iraq's lack of investment in its own reconstruction as evidence of how continued, unending U.S. involvement in the country may only be delaying the day when the Baghdad government will become self-sufficient. At the very least, Levin contended, Iraq has shown itself content to rely on U.S. handouts for as long as they continue to be offered.
From Levin's statement:
Iraq now has tens of billions of dollars in surplus funds in their banks and in accounts around the world, including about $30 billion in U.S. banks. But Iraqi leaders and bureaucrats aren’t spending those funds. The result is that, far from financing “its own reconstruction” as the administration promised five years ago, the Iraqi government has left the U.S. to make most of the capital expenditures needed to provide essential services and improve the quality of life of Iraqi citizens.
American taxpayers are spending vast sums on reconstruction efforts. For example, the U.S. has spent at least $27.6 billion to date on major infrastructure projects, job training, education and training and equipping of the Iraqi Security Forces. On the other hand, according to the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, the Iraqi Government budgeted $6.2 billion for its capital budget in 2006 but spent less than a quarter of it. As of August 31, 2007, the Iraqi Government had spent somewhere between 4.4 percent (according to the GAO) and 24 percent (according to the White House) of its $10.1 billion capital budget for 2007. As of last Thursday, the U.S. government is paying the salaries of almost 100,000 Iraqis who are working on reconstruction.
To add insult to injury, in addition to spending tens of billions of U.S. dollars on reconstruction, American taxpayers are also paying three to four dollars a gallon on gas here at home, much of which originates in the Middle East, including Iraq. The Iraqi government seems content to sit by, build up surpluses and let Americans reconstruct their country and foot the bill. But the American people surely aren’t content with that, and the Bush administration shouldn’t be either.
Iraq possesses the world's third largest oil reserves, behind Saudi Arabia and Canada, totaling 115 billion barrels. According to the AP, by February of this year, average daily production had reached 2.4 million barrels, with exports averaging 1.93 million barrels per day.
Photo used under a Creative Commons license from James Gordon.
Comments
The AP might be wrong if that's a literal quote... it would mean that the oil fields would be depleted in less than two months!
Posted by: bma on 04/08/08 at 2:52 PM Respond
It's about time Congress grew a pair and cut war funding. If the Iraquis want us to stay, I'm sure we can come up with a reasonable payment plan. That is after they pay up to this point!
Posted by: kirkbrew on 04/08/08 at 6:02 PM Respond
So George Bush and the Republicans are conservatives? What are they conserving? Certainly not lives, money, oil, the Constitution or the environment.
Posted by: AlexLawyer on 04/08/08 at 10:58 PM Respond
Words like "Iraq" and "the Iraquis" seem somewhat imprecise. Somebody's pocket's getting lined, for sure!
Posted by: Kathy Giannini on 04/09/08 at 3:06 AM Respond
While I am the last to support pouring money into Iraq, or anywhere else, while our own nation fall apart, I must say that it wasn't the Iraqis who destroyed their nation so that it requires reconstruction. It wasn't Saddam who bombed his cities to rubble. And if you say "Well it was the terrorists and insurgents who did it", they are responsible for only a small portion of the destruction. And it was our invasion that turned them loose in the first place.
The reconstruction of Iraq, the repair of the damage we have cause should be financed by those who were oh so anxious to cause it. Let Cheney, Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al pay, instead of giving them tax cuts.
Posted by: DaveD on 04/09/08 at 4:09 AM Respond
bma, million not billion, of course. what a difference a letter makes. thanks for catching it.
Posted by: Bruce Falconer on 04/09/08 at 6:16 AM Respond
So you won't mind if I break in your house, move in for good, get angry that you aren't sharing your paycheck, then charge you to stay and keep other looters out? Sounds like a deal please publish your address. BTW I'll donate my spot to a homeless soldier.
Posted by: Justin on 04/09/08 at 9:40 AM Respond
ARCHIVE
April 6, 2008 - April 12, 2008
March 30, 2008 - April 5, 2008
March 23, 2008 - March 29, 2008
March 16, 2008 - March 22, 2008
March 9, 2008 - March 15, 2008
February 24, 2008 - March 1, 2008
February 17, 2008 - February 23, 2008
February 10, 2008 - February 16, 2008
February 3, 2008 - February 9, 2008
January 27, 2008 - February 2, 2008
January 20, 2008 - January 26, 2008
January 13, 2008 - January 19, 2008
January 6, 2008 - January 12, 2008
December 30, 2007 - January 5, 2008
December 23, 2007 - December 29, 2007
December 16, 2007 - December 22, 2007
December 9, 2007 - December 15, 2007
December 2, 2007 - December 8, 2007
November 25, 2007 - December 1, 2007
November 18, 2007 - November 24, 2007
November 11, 2007 - November 17, 2007
November 4, 2007 - November 10, 2007
October 28, 2007 - November 3, 2007
October 21, 2007 - October 27, 2007
October 14, 2007 - October 20, 2007
October 7, 2007 - October 13, 2007
September 30, 2007 - October 6, 2007
September 23, 2007 - September 29, 2007
September 16, 2007 - September 22, 2007
September 9, 2007 - September 15, 2007
September 2, 2007 - September 8, 2007
August 26, 2007 - September 1, 2007
August 19, 2007 - August 25, 2007
August 12, 2007 - August 18, 2007
RECENT COMMENTS
ABC: Top Bush Advisors Were "Personally Involved" in Planning Interrogations (1)
Clara Jeffery wrote:
And it's not the first time Ashcroft was on the side of th...
[more]
Obama Swamping the Airwaves; Plus, the Expectation Game in PA (8)
Kathy Giannini wrote:
Obama has been outspending his opponents from Iowa on. I ...
[more]
Clinton and Obama: We (Heart) Gays, Especially in Pennsylvania (53)
Tristan wrote:
Jody, The truth? As you see it. The voice of the majority ...
[more]
What If There'd Been Fox News or CNN During Slavery? (2)
Derik wrote:
ahh, Debra you are now entering the state of secular human...
[more]
John McCain: Family Man? (41)
jules beaty wrote:
Mc cains WIFE PLEAD GUI:TY TO STEALING DRUGS FROM VETERANS...
[more]
Asbestos Company Settles, Leaves Montana Residents in the Dust (4)
Michael L. Wagner wrote:
Don't strain yourself pumpkin...
You got me brother--Mali...
[more]
More Evidence of John McCain's Naiveté on the Economy (2)
Tina wrote:
Jon, watch that word voodoo. Congolese Rice told McCain th...
[more]
A Feminist Hears a Who (49)
Bert wrote:
I recommend: Life and times of Annie Oakley, Carrie Nation...
[more]
Why Payday Loans Are Better Than Indentured Servitude (6)
Roy wrote:
Not all cash loans are that bad. We've used cashloancity.c...
[more]
Protest the Olympics? The Conundrum for San Francisco Liberals (10)
corneilius wrote:
The Olympics are a toxic mime of excellence in war.
Hence...
[more]
Movable Type 3.33


RECENT ENTRIES
Misleading Headline of the Week: This. Is. Obama!
Now on the San Francisco Ballot: The George W. Bush Sewage Plant
AFRICOM: State Dept., USAID Concerned About "Militarization" of Foreign Aid
Messiah Watch: Obama as Neo
Obama Loses One Fundraising Advantage
Part of a Peace Group? Might Want to Take a Look Around...
Air Force Design Divas Request First Class 'Comfort Capsules'
Next Week: The Overseas Obama Extravaganza
An All-American Advertisement