No Child Unrecruited
High School cadets in Mariette, Georgia
News: Should the military be given the names of every high school student in America?
|
|
Sharon Shea-Keneally, principal of Mount Anthony Union High School in Bennington, Vermont, was shocked when she received a letter in May from military recruiters demanding a list of all her students, including names, addresses, and phone numbers. The school invites recruiters to participate in career days and job fairs, but like most school districts, it keeps student information strictly confidential. "We don't give out a list of names of our kids to anybody," says Shea-Keneally, "not to colleges, churches, employers -- nobody." But when Shea-Keneally insisted on an explanation, she was in for an even bigger surprise: The recruiters cited the No Child Left Behind Act, President Bush's sweeping new education law passed earlier this year. There, buried deep within the law's 670 pages, is a provision requiring public secondary schools to provide military recruiters not only with access to facilities, but also with contact information for every student -- or face a cutoff of all federal aid. "I was very surprised the requirement was attached to an education law," says Shea-Keneally. "I did not see the link." The military complained this year that up to 15 percent of the nation's high schools are "problem schools" for recruiters. In 1999, the Pentagon says, recruiters were denied access to schools on 19,228 occasions. Rep. David Vitter, a Republican from Louisiana who sponsored the new recruitment requirement, says such schools "demonstrated an anti-military attitude that I thought was offensive." To many educators, however, requiring the release of personal information intrudes on the rights of students. "We feel it is a clear departure from the letter and the spirit of the current student privacy laws," says Bruce Hunter, chief lobbyist for the American Association of School Administrators. Until now, schools could share student information only with other educational institutions. "Now other people will want our lists," says Hunter. "It's a slippery slope. I don't want student directories sent to Verizon either, just because they claim that all kids need a cell phone to be safe." The new law does give students the right to withhold their records. But school officials are given wide leeway in how to implement the law, and some are simply handing over student directories to recruiters without informing anyone -- leaving students without any say in the matter. "I think the privacy implications of this law are profound," says Jill Wynns, president of the San Francisco Board of Education. "For the federal government to ignore or discount the concerns of the privacy rights of millions of high school students is not a good thing, and it's something we should be concerned about." Educators point out that the armed services have exceeded their recruitment goals for the past two years in a row, even without access to every school. The new law, they say, undercuts the authority of some local school districts, including San Francisco and Portland, Oregon, that have barred recruiters from schools on the grounds that the military discriminates against gays and lesbians. Officials in both cities now say they will grant recruiters access to their schools and to student information -- but they also plan to inform students of their right to withhold their records. Some students are already choosing that option. According to Principal Shea-Keneally, 200 students at her school -- one-sixth of the student body -- have asked that their records be withheld. Recruiters are up-front about their plans to use school lists to aggressively pursue students through mailings, phone calls, and personal visits -- even if parents object. "The only thing that will get us to stop contacting the family is if they call their congressman," says Major Johannes Paraan, head U.S. Army recruiter for Vermont and northeastern New York. "Or maybe if the kid died, we'll take them off our list."
Image:
Aaron Lee Fineman
Comments:

These benefits are entirely separate from the budget used for Iraq and Afghanistan.
You non-military people need to do your research before you post asinine and uninformed comments.
As for the point of requiring information from our students, American has since before the French Indian war required such information of "able bodied men" the fact that we no longer discriminate and require this information for women to would seem a step forward for woman’s equality.
Also, more than a few of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence had been in the militia or British military. Further more; a logical person must admit that the vaulted ideas of Jefferson might be mere footnotes in history without the Army of Washington.
Me: Ok so someone here needs to do some research because although i have not looked up the stats for the korean and vietnam war and for that reason will not dispute them i am however very willing to dispute your statement that a million in iraq have died...The actual number is 4000 total through all 4 branches of the military and that is as of this last monday. lets think about this 4000 in 5 years yes it is tragic however so is the thousands of college students that die in a year from alcohol related incidents. And, that doesn't even necessarily mean that the college student was the one drinking. And i agree that it is patriotic to questoin authority however it is not patriotic to LIE, Or Squew numbers to try and benifit your argument...LOOK UP THE FACTS...
Him: Um because of soldiers he would have been tried, because of soldiers 2 million people died in korea, 5 million people in vietnam, and already a million in iraq. you may say its patriotic or your duty to become a soldier for your country. thats bull crap. its patriotic to question authority, and humanitarian to not join the military(obviosly) besides jefferson's dream died, this is britian(not litteraly)
Posted by:chrisDecember 6, 2007
---------
Me: Concerned Student...I must agree you have mental problems...WOOP WOOP...by the way if you scream when you see a military representatives strolling through the hall ways you aren't going to help your cause with the whole..."mental problems" either. And im glad you know where the recruiting office is but heres a question for you...Did one of your teachers or guidance office suggest you talk to them or give you the number or did you see it as you drove past or go into it when your BF joined the army?...Keep up the good work Stay in school and keep the shrink posted on any changes in your mental circumstances...PLEASE! I hope you aren't just mad that your disqualified for military service when you spoke with a recruiter.
Her: i resent the military recruiters, they should stay out of our schools. fortunately for me, i have mental problems which wouldn't allow me to serve anyways, but i worry about my younger brother. why are they allowed to be here in the first place?? i honestly don't understand it. when i see them strolling around my school it makes me want to scream. i see them constantly, handing out flyers, pencils, folders, buisness cards... the works. i even have an army t- shirt from before my boyfriend went to basic training. (yes, he is in the army) and for the record... i know where the recruiting office is, thank you very much "Someone Who Cares".
Posted by:concerned studentDecember 12, 2007
---------
Me: Knowing Recruiters I can guarentee that they don't paint anything that looks like a rose garden hence that old recruiting poster "We Dont Promise A Rose Garden"...Every marine i know will tell you "I will promise you two things. A Hair Cut and a Hard Time." By the way How does a Special Ed student pass an Asvab. If they can they dont belong in a special education program. And back to the full disclosure thing, yI can tell ou right now that people dont join the Marine corps for the benefits i know this prolly wont make sense to you because you think that the military is BS however All marines join the Marine Corps to be Marines and again knowing Recruiters I know they dont want someone to join the Marine Corps for any other reason. I hope by attrocities you aren't suggesting that special educated students are running around Iraq with guns because if you are then you would have to be the Retard at that point.
Teacher: I teach high school and can tell you first hand the lengths these unscrupulous recruiters go to in order to meet their quotas. Bonuses and promotions vs. full disclosure of facts is a losing battle every time. PARTICULARLY disheartening is their specific targeting of special education students that have little or no reasoning abilities......and we wonder why attrocities are committed in war.
Posted by:teacher101December 20, 2007
-----------
Me: I know around where im from the recruiters only go into a particular school once maybe twice a month as it is scheduled they dont "Invade" by the way Teacher...How do you spell adventure...maybe you should go back to school for spelling. And the Benefits aren't Unbelievable they are true...LOOK THEM UP!...and relentless pressure at least in my case generally pushes me away or turns me off to whatever is being told to me...
Uneducated TEACHER!: aLSO, RECRUITERS ARE IN OUR HIGH SCHOOL AT LEAST TWICE A WEEK WITH THEIR INFORMATIONAL BOOTHS/ADVENTER VIDEOS/FREE HANDOUTS BOMBARDING THESE KIDS RELENTLESSLY ABOUT THE UNBELIEVABLE BENEFITS OF THE MILITARY. I AM ALL IN FAVOR OF AN OCCASSIONAL VISIT AND BELIEVE THE MILITARY IS GREAT FOR SOME KIDS. HOWEVER, RELENTLESS PRESSURE CAN AND DOES LEAD TO ENLISTMENTS THAT ARE LATER REGRETTED. SHAME ON OUR PRESIDENT FOR HIS "NO CHILD UNRECRUITED LAW" AND EVERY OTHER CRIME AGAINST THIS COUNTRY. JANUARY 2009 CAN'T GET HERE SOON ENOUGH.
Posted by:tEACHER101
-------
Sincerely,
Someone Who Cares
Marv: First of all Jp That's not true. Soliders had nothing to do with the creation or the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Secondly, the choice should be that of the child and not some recruiter shoveling information or hounding him or her at school. The child should go to the recruiter and make the decision and not the other way around.
Posted by:Marva
----------
ME: My appologies to you maam for the use of "the guy"...i still dont believe you only made 800 dollars a month pvts now starting out make almost 1400 dollars. And thats a single guy and not including housing or food. Btw i have to wonder what rank your husband was because in 1990 the only way that he made 800 dollars a month, and this is just base pay here, is if he were a Private E-1 and it only takes 6 mos to get promoted to E-2 so where is this coming from?...if you'd like to check my math by all means please do here is a web site that will help you see. http://www.dfas.mil/militarypay/200 6militarypaytables/militarypaypriorrates/1990.pdf just copy and paste that into your web browser it will help you...And the reason we need recruiters in the schools is because they dont know the benefits and all that the military can offer...as far as incentives they are generally there as a little extra help for things such as paying off past student loans or taking care of some debt that an applicant may have. it kind of reminds me of that movie FIELD OF DREAMS "If you build it he will come"...if you educate them they will come... FOR ALL THOS READING STILL CHECK THIS SITE OUT IT WILL GIVE YOU THE BASE PAY FOR EVERY YEAR FROM 1949 till 2006 and if you want more up to date you can google them too...here it is... http://www.dfas.mil/militarypay/200 6militarypaytables/militarypaypriorrates.html Good luck all who do not believe.
Her: I am "the guy" who said the family of 4 was making $800 a month. I am 36 years old, not 80. The year was 1990, thank you very much. You can google it if you would like. I am talking about my experiences and how I thought the military was when my husband was active duty. It's nice that people have positive experiences that they can talk about. I am not saying that the military is bad for everyone. I am just talking about my own situation. If military life was so great we wouldn't need recruiters in the schools and incentives to join.
Posted by:christine
-------------
ME: Are you sure that a majority want them home or is it a majority want them to finish up soon and come home?...by the way recruiters dont neglect to tell the students that 57% never recieve their ed benefits. what the students fail to do is when in the military or even after the military the students fail to apply their ed benefits toward their lives. You see what you should have said is that 57% fail to utilize their GI Bill, Not they never recieve because when you say that you are manipulating the stats to bend them for what you want...oh and i guess thats kinda like your stereo type on recruiters..."Bend the truth" some more Tony! You have up to 10 years after you leave the military to use your GI bill and then at that point yes you do lose it...but what takes a person 10 yrs to finally decide they want to use that money?...and if they dont want they can opt out of the GI bill and save that 1200 dollars instead of investing it to earn a guarenteed 38000. by the way why are you stereo typing military recruiters?...were you a recruiter?...did you lie?...Do better research.
TONY: a Majority of the US , wants our Troops to come home. So the Military is Leeching off my School for new Enlistees. What Military recruiters Neglect to tell Students that 57% All enlistees NEVER receive theire Educational Benefits Even after paying the NON-Refundable $1200. dollar depositto the military. also Enlistees are to serve the military for a period of 8 years. Military Recruiters lie,cheat,bend the truth,steal,borrow, do whatever to get a Contract Signed,
Posted by:Anthony
-------------
ME: And by CHOICE the military members do not go to college because it is out there for them and they can use it if they would like...but like myself many CHOOSE not to use those benefits. btw your post i like much better than the others it is clear concise and to the point...it also could prove a good point if it weren't for the fact that not using their benefits is a CHOICE, not something they are forced into. Cool Beans though STAY THE COURSE!
A Student: Perhaps what is most ironic is the clear evidence that the people repping their great military experience here seem to lack one of the key benefits the military is said to offer: education. Look at the caliber of their posts and my point proves itself.
Posted by:Student
-------------
ME: I think you have a good point the Government should stay out of the schools however in order to get rid of Government from school they need to lower taxes and people need to take the money they save from that and apply it toward private schools for their children. Unfortunately that is unrealistic and we need to take our head out of the clouds and do something productive like educating our children to be able to make more sound decisions that the parents will feel confident in...however that will never happen either because unless the son or daughter is telling their parents that they want to go to college the parents will still say their son or daughter is not making a sound decision...they would rather their son or daughter go off to college and waste their time, money and believe it or not quite possibly their lives again i encourage everyone here who believe too many die in iraq to look up how many deaths their are in colleges every year and while your at it narrow the search down a little bit make it just a search about how many college students die in alcohol related incidents each year...NOW THAT IS SAD!!! THAT SHOULD BE UN-CONSTITUTIONAL
PETER PANS SHADOW: The issue nobody is addressing is that from a Constitutional point of view the federal government has no business in our local schools. I would argue that the department of education is questionable. They justify it by saying it is for the "kids," and they use the interstate trade clause to look legal. However, I believe that power to "manage" education lies in the power of the state, and thus more with in the control of the people.
As for the point of requiring information from our students, American has since before the French Indian war required such information of "able bodied men" the fact that we no longer discriminate and require this information for women to would seem a step forward for woman’s equality.
Posted by:TheShadowsareWatching
---------
Sincerely,
Someone who cares
my aunt was in the air force for 10 years and then got out and that was 30 years ago and she is still paying for her loans
1. It is an ALL Volunteer Army. That means, despite how much we talk to high school students, it is still up to them to join.
2. What would happen if there were no Army or military recruiters? Who is gonna defend our future? Who will defend the freedoms we enjoy?
3. If you think soldiers are poor and mistreated, think again. I am 34. I earn over 70,000 per year. I am eligible to retire in less than 5 years....but since I LOVE THE ARMY, I may stay in longer. I got to live in Europe for 5 1/2 years.
4. Is the Army all roses.....of course not, and if anyone is so naive that they think that it is is probably too stupid to pass our entrance exam.
5. 7 out of 10 people aged 17-24 are not even qualifed to serve in the Army. So most of you uptight people don't have to worry since the majority are too fat, too uneducated, and have too much of a criminal background to join.
Let us do our jobs. There are some people that want to keep your freedoms despite the fact you protest and talk down on them. So go ahead and take out a second mortgage on your house so your overweight pot smoking kid can go to community college for ten years and waste your money.....and guys like me will keep them free.
My last thought is this.....we can agggresivly ASK kids to join, or we can politely DRAFT them against their will. I prefer the freedom to choose. Drafts are not the answer. Hereos that join every day thanks to recruiters showing them a plan for success. Before you bash recruiting and military service take a moment to think, "What did I do today to defend freedom and protect the innocent."
Any of you that are talking trash that have never served, I could care less. I have been to Iraq. You non-military parrots just keep chirping about how bad things are.....well, I feel like you are nothing but a bunch of negative idiots that don't have a simple appreciation for freedom and the life we have. Go spend a DAY in a third world county. Watch a monther mourn her child that has just died from starvation because her government had no medical assistance.......go to a naturalization ceremony and ask them why they came here. Wake up America.....this IS the best place to live. We drink bottled water and surf the internet, and then bitch about pettty crap that does not affect us. Imagine waking up tomorrow in China.....and you want to go to church....oh, that's right, Christians are pursecuted in China. Has anyone in herer ever volunteered at an Hungarian Orphanage? I have. That is reality. not some spoiled fat kid playing x-box while his homeworks sits on the table and mom and dad are busy watching t.v.
By they way.....you know what the best part about serving in the Army is???? It's that chill that goes up my spine and the tears that fill my eyes when I hear the national anthem. That is why I serve!
GO ARMY
Without recruits, there would be a draft. Be grateful that others VOLUNTEER to spend weeks out in the woods, eating MREs, sleeping 4 hours a night, and walking miles every day in blistering heat and thick humidity! If you have a poor attitude, you're not going to enjoy it. You shouldn't serve with the sole purpose to make money and live in great housing. If that's your sole reason for enlisting, stay at home.
Sometimes I wish military service was mandatory so that people could understand the sacrifices others make so that friends and family (and strangers!) can stay at home and live their normal lives.
Anti-militarism is extremism. There are people in this world who will rob or hurt you. How can you possibly have been educated in history and not see the value of our men and women in uniform?
There is a world out there that most Americans are completely ignorant of. These people, their intentions, and the consequences of those intentions are REAL. You can stay home and complain, but thank God someone will do something about it!
As a matter of fact, I'm giving out a speech about this topic on MOnday for my speech presentation. I've done my research and I've already been through that recruiment bs. I felt harrassed by this stupid recruiter that did not understand the meaning of "NO"
It's true this country offers us Freedom and endless opportunities, but these are the opportunities that we've long been fighting for, opportunities that our anscestors have died for.
A strong military is vital to the security of our nation because it allows us to fight for freedom and democracy. Students have the right to know-and-deserve to know all the options available for them after graduation.
Our military can and must continue to fulfill recruitment needs while preserving our family privacy.
There’s no excuse for violating the privacy of our children, brothers and or sisters.
There’s no governmental purpose to collect their grades, much less their races.
There’s also no legitimate reason to ignore the rights of parents to restrict strangers from contacting their children.
We must change this policy or “No Child Left Behind” will really mean “Hey kid, we got your number!”
I'm not saying there shouldn't be any recruiters, because I know there are people out there that really want to join, but please don't harrass those who don't. Thank You. Instead of wasting your time fighting for what's right or wrong about this topic. You guys should be making peace.
Sincerely, Just a college student...
I am a proud soldier who joined the Army in 1988. I have been on several tours of duty in hazardous fire areas from the Gulf War to the present Operations in Iraq. I am not now, nor have I ever been a recruiter. I entered the Army as a Private, E-1, in 1988.
I can not speak to the methods of recruiting or some recruiters. Do some recruiters lie, tell half-truths or otherwise breach their integrity as a soldier and person? Yes. However, these are the few bad apples that many professions have the displeasure of dealing with. Those actions are also punishable offenses that can ruin and even end a soldier's career.
I can speak to the pay issue that has been raised by many here. I was 17 and single when I joined the Army. I am now married with 6 children. In January of 1989 I recieved a monthly pay of $699, and I have the pay statements to prove this. I lived in the barracks (a basic 4-man cube with 4 bunks and 4 wall lockers) so I was not auhorized the Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). Because I lived in the barracks, I was issued a Meal Card and dined in the "Mess Hall" (Army for Cafeteria) for free. Because of this, I was not authorized to recieve the Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS or "Food Supplement").
Even as a young Sergeant, E-5, I barely made over $1400 a month in 1993, this included my BAH and BAS (called VHA and Sep Rats at that time, I believe). I had 2 children in my house and paid child support to my ex-wife for 1. Yes, I qualfied for WIC assistance, free lunch programs at my childrens schools and a couple other small programs. I personally have never qualified for food stamps, although I was close. I have had soldiers that did qualify.
I now make $3800 a month in Base Pay, $300 a month in BAS and $1000 a month in BAH. Not glorious money, but I do ok. Keep in mind that this is generally a 60-hour work week (from 6:30 am to 5 pm give or take an hour or so). This also does not include the long months spent in desolate conditions or under fire. Areas and circumstances we do not really desire, but we accomplish our jobs. Yes, we recieve a small additional stipend for this, but is it enough?
No, we could recieve much better pay for the risks, times and problems that soldiers endure.
For any who doubt my pay numbers, use google. Google military pay charts and a large list of many sites will appear. Google the year and military pay chart and you can even find the specific numbers for that year. Here is the link that will show the defense department records for years dating all the back to 1949:
http://www.dfas.mil/militarypay/200 6militarypaytables/militarypaypriorrates.html
As for higher education, depending on your job and duty station will depend on the amount of education you can recieve during your service. Many times I have not had the oppportunity to do any college. I have also foolishly squandered other chances to better my education. Tuition assistance is widely available and will cover all or almost all tuition and books in most places. For those who don't use their GI Bill, that's their fault. It is available. I have recieved 29 credit hours of college in my 19 years of service. I probably could have a degree by now, but honestly, when it comes to college I am lazy. I don't like it. The career path I am planning does not require college, so why do it? Does a piece of paper make me nicer, or more honest, or better than anyone else? I think character counts as a measure of a person. That is not to say that college is useless. For a great many people it is a wonderful opportunity that can be rewarding and enhancing. Just not for all.
Now, military service is not the right choice for everyone either. Even after some people join, they hate the Army, and that is their right. Remember that the key word in that sentence is choice. Right now, we have a volunteer service and it is a choice and not a draft that has a young person raise their hand for an Oath of Service. For those who do, and those that have, thank you for your service. For those who do not, that's ok. There are many other ways to serve your country in a positive manner also. Civil service, emergency services, educators and the list goes on. Isn't it wonderful to live in a place where these posts can be made without fear of retribution?
I think that people should join the Army and recruiting should not be banned. But for the recruiters to use this Any-Way-Possible angle is an invasion of personal space. People didn't even know that this was an attachment to the No Child Left Behind Act!
Join the Army, I've got nothing against men and women protecting their country. But recruiters still shouldn't be able to do this to 15 year old kids, whether they want to join or not!
This does NOT go into whether people should join the Army or "serve this great nation", so people who are making those arguments, just stop it. This is about complete strangers being able to access every single aspect of your life, which is just --put simply-- not right.
Whether or not this is true, it still stands that children should know their right to refuse to give recruiters information. I have never know until recently that I had that right.
I have the utmost respect for anyone wishing to join the armed forces, but they should have a non-glorified, realistic understanding of what they're getting into. Students who hear the false promises of army recruiters and join the armed forces don't understand the danger they're putting themselves in, and that is totally immoral.
Recruiters dress in full dress uniform as a form of intimidation. You are told you'll get a bonus (which you don't get till AFTER your service), told it will pay for college (even though the Pell Grant will also for a civy), you are told "you'll be defending our freedom" when in fact you will be shipped to Iraq to defend bid oil interests (another thing that isn't told unless you ASK).
WE DONT WANT GRADES, OR RACE OR ANYTHING OTHER THAN A NAME AND A PHONE NUMBER. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.
...Actually my dear, what the military is for is DESTRUCTION of human bodies, buildings, and the environment. How unevolved are we? Children and teens do not have the capacities to make such important decisions, especially when they are indoctrinated with lies.
I know there are people opposed to military service. Tough! If you or your child don't want any part of the military, then simply throw out their 'junk mail' or say 'No, thank you' when they call. Politicians are exempt from 'Do Not Call' lists; our military should be no different.
I joined the Army in 1985 and served over 21 years total in the active army, National Guard, and US Army Reserve. There were many tough times and many bad situations, but overall the experience was very rewarding.
I saw countries I would never see and provided humanitarian assistance to people who needed it desperately. I learned foreign languages. I never fought in combat. May pay at the time I got out as a Major with full allowances and tax breaks was over $130,000 a year.
I went to school at night while I was in Germany, earning an AA degree with 100% tuition paid. Then using my GI Bill and National Guard tuition assistance, I completed a B.S completely debt free. After that, my National Guard/USAR paycheck helped me pay for graduate school where I got a PhD.
With only 30% of the age-eligible population eligible because of health, legal, or educational criteria, it is ESSENTIAL that the military have access to give their pitch to each and every potential recruit.
"Preying" on our kids? In a world with drugs, crime, cults, and predatory salesmen trying to reach for your souls and your wallets, considering our valiant and necessary military to be "preying" on young people is absurd!
For the person who says 66% of vets who participate in the GI Bill don't get benefits, you are a LIAR. That's Conscientiousobjector.org BS. Not everyone who enlists CHOOSES to participate. If one chooses to participate, going to college later is your OPTION. If you don't use the benefits, you can transfer them to an immediate family member. Having an OPTION for college assistance is better than having NO OPTION. Veterans also are entitled to VA home loans and the vast majority never use this. Is that statistic supposed to mean something? Shut your face!
It is wonderful to serve your country in the military. It's not a dishonor to choose not to serve. But in a democracy which relies on a volunteer force, it is completely dishonorable and unpatriotic to vigorously oppose our military and its ability to recruit.
How would you like to go back to a system where your service was determined by lottery and was COMPULSORY!
If you hate our military, you are un-American. So just shut up!
Serving in our military is voluntary. If you think you can or should control your adult grandchildren's choice of whether or not to join the military, you are a hapless control freak. Why don't you tell them how to vote, what to eat, what to wear, and whether or not they should have sex or get an abortion. Shut up!
Here are the current military pay tables:
http://www.dfas.mil/militarypay/mil itarypaytables/2008MilitaryPayCharts35.pdf
The lowest private earns $1347 a month, not counting housing, food, and clothing allowances. You get extra pay if you have a dependent. It comes with 100% free health insurance and 100% tuition assistance for college classes. Enlistments often come with hefty bonuses which augment this pay rate. If you serve in combat, you receive combat pay and ALL your pay is tax free.
You stay at the lowest pay grade for only 6 months (or less). By 1 year in service, you will already have a $200 a month pay raise. By 2 years, your pay will have risen at least $400 a month.
If you've got four kids and no college education, you're not going to be able to afford to live on ANY job you're likely to get. You can't blame the military for your unwise breeding. And the Axiom of Revealed Preferences applies: if someone CHOOSES to join the military, it was likely the best choice available to them at the time that they knew about.
You are free to say 'No' to a recruiter. You are not free from supporting our military with your tax dollars or allowing our military to do its job of recruiting and maintaining a force.
I'm just trying to get all the facts and remain unbiased. Thanks!
credit cards on the doors , student loans ,recruters,nclb ect. its time to connect the dots and look at ourselves and our communities. reform is needed