In The Blogs

Media

Is the Galactica Finale Bad News for Lost?

—Photo courtesy Sci-Fi

I'll admit I've never been as much of a Battlestar Galactica fanatic as some people, even though I'm enough of a sucker for apocalyptic sci-fi that I stood in an opening-night line to see The Core. But even that skepticism wasn't enough to prepare me for the pile of stinking silliness that was the show's final episode on Friday night. Turns out the mystery song was a Google Map to the really real Earth, and God was directing them there the whole time through magic angels, or maybe demons, but whatever, their work here is done so they're gonna go "poof" and let you guys go about mating with the natives and making more people who can eventually make more robots. And, scene. Questions that had seemed vital, propulsive forces to the show's dramatic arc—What's the deal with reincarnated Starbuck? Who are the secret Cylons and why are they there? How does this world intersect with present-day Earth?—were tossed aside with quick "God did it" explanations or comically deadpan titles: "150,000 years later." Did the show bite off more than it could chew, or just crumple in the face of overwhelming expectations? And what could it mean for everybody's other favorite sci-fi ensemble mystery?

image
image

Lost has promised us one more season after this one, leading up to a "shocking" conclusion, and while they've assured us there will be no easy outs like "turns out they're all in purgatory," Battlestar Galactica's wrapup of its vaguely spiritual mysteries with "I've served my purpose now" magic-wand baloney makes me nervous. Even more so than its space-faring sibling, Lost has tangled itself up in unfathomably complex knots obscured by smoke monsters and magic numbers, and even recently, as the show has seemed to accelerate its answer-offering, these answers only seem to bring up more questions. Can Lost possibly give satisfactory explanations to enough mysteries to make it all worth it without giving the Smoke Monster a climactic speech where it tells each of our characters what they've learned, says "I've served my purpose now" and dissolves?

Look, willfully obscuring your plot can be great, and while I do like nice tidy answers, I'm happy to live with a couple mysteries. Witness the greatest movie of the past ten years, Mulholland Drive. I spent my first viewing awash in the Lynchy atmospherics without a clue about why Naomi Watts apparently switched characters halfway through, but after some reading (and the patient hand-holding of smarter friends) the puzzle-pieces came together. Of course, certain parts of the movie that seemed to demand explanations at first (the smoke in the room, the blue box) turned out to live happily without them, as cinematic flourishes or symbols with multiple meanings, but there were enough real, solid answers to keep me happy. Perhaps it's a good sign that Mulholland Drive was originally supposed to be a series for ABC (can you freaking imagine?) and that they share creepy google-eyed actor Patrick Fischler. But if Lost tries to wrap things up by telling me "it was all just God's plan," I'm going to ask for these 60-odd hours of my life back.

Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.
Comments
no profile pic for comment author

Mormons lost in Space

As an ex-mormon the ending was keenly obvious that it was rooted in the goofy theology of the Mormon's Adam God doctrine...I kept waiting for the Mormon mishies to knock on the Gallatica's airlock offering free Book of Mormons to the crew.....

no profile pic for comment author

A drastic misreading

I must admit this is a bit of an unfocused ramble, but:

I believe that this reading of the final episode here is, frankly, oversimplistic. More than one viewer has complained about the deus ex machina of the final episode, but I think that doing so completely misses the point of what is trying to be accomplished here. Since Day 1, BSG has toyed with the viewers' assumptions not only about morals and ethics, but about the ontological and epistemological dimensions of our realities. The upsetting nature of the spirituality of the final episode is the ultimate transgressive brilliance of the show; BSG has, in effect, made an argument for hope and faith in a storyline otherwise characterized by the gritty brutality of human nature. The spirituality- the LACK of "rational" explanation- subverts the logocentric, Foucaultian drive to exert power over the narrative that demands that we scientifically "know" how each of the miraculous things has happened. I am in fact glad that the show chose NOT to reveal full explanations, focusing instead on the resolutions of the characters, rooting itself in the specificity of subjective experience so much that in spite of the fantastical elements, it felt viscerally "real" in the same way that magical realism can. I don't care that Starbuck's angelic nature is not completely explained; it makes more "sense" this way than if it was. Furthermore, the show has always spoke to the times in which it has been produced-- it captures the angst and the terrifying loss of our collective soul in a post-9/11 world; pushing for hope is what this finale does; not hope in God necessarily, but hope in general. Hope for the impossible. Is this not how Barack Obama won the election, after all?

no profile pic for comment author

Yeah, okay

I hear you, and I too am intrigued by art subverting traditional narrative forms -- anybody who loves David Lynch has to appreciate a little ontological freakiness! Perhaps I should have taken my criticism one step further -- it's not so much the lack of explanation that bothers me, it's the pedestrian, cliched and internally inconsistent religious explanations that bother me. Some angels know they're angels, I guess, and others don't, in this little Galactical universe? God's plan to bring everybody to a happy planet with DNA-compatible apes apparently also included blowing the frak out of the human race to begin with? Real-life "sorry, God just says it's this way" explanations infuriate me, and BSG's were of the worst kind, the kind that reduce knowledge- and fact-based concerns to dust. I guess if we want narrative instability done right, we have to turn to, I dunno, Nabokov, since the Sci-Fi channel can only give us "Intelligent Design."

Debra J. Dickerson

Damn! This sh*& is too deep for me, but...

Debra J. Dickerson

PB (et al)
I watched BG in fractured periods here and there, with a distracted single mom's crappy focus. Basically: TV is just a place to hide from my kids. Honey, I'm so easily amused, the finale won me over with the simple tactic of making the unbelievably fracked up and high maintenance Starbuck a freaking ANGEL. Or...whatever. And Baltar? That (*&^^%% loser *&&())__. I still don't know what to think.

Debra J. Dickerson

More from moi

Debra J. Dickerson

i forgot to mention: I've never seen even a single episode of Lost. My bad for screwing up the thread.

Did I mention I was a single mom? Cuz, like, that excuses everything.

no profile pic for comment author

har!

you're right, single momitude does excuse a lot! ;) I'm not saying there weren't a lot of good things about BSG or even the finale -- as the NY Times said, the death of Roslin just as Adama finds a spot for their cabin was deeply affecting, and the twist of having Baltar turn out to be, like, everybody's savior at the end, was genuinely surprising. But Starbuck saying "I think my time is done here" and then going "ker-poof"?!?! I'm sorry, that made me throw things at the TV. The angst about who she was formed the central kernel of the show for its final arc, but the explanation turns out to be "secret jesus magic"? Arghghgh!!!!

Perhaps I'm too cynical and atheist to allow any religiosity through my filters, but still, it really seemed like a cop-out even from a dramatic standpoint. I dunno. I guess any show that uses big zoomy explosion sound effects for its space battles (vacuum, people) can also make people magic angels.

no profile pic for comment author

OK, I Know It's LOOSELY based on Mormon stuff...

I am a near-atheist, married first to a Mormon, and now currently to a liberal unafilliated Christian.

The first time my first wife said "Quorum of Twelve" I went wide-eyed with humor.

.... but if this is really a big cheerleading session for the LDS Way....

... then how do you explain that one angel is an egocentric sex addict, another is an alcoholic, and another is a machine?

Obviously not from the Celestial Kingdom these ones, except possibly for the machine.

Which can only lead to the following logical conclusion: Mormons are Cylons.

Post a comment
Alternately, you may login to or register an account
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

Mother Jones Podcast
Get in on the conversation! We talk about culture, politics, the environment, the economy and more. Listen now!

TalkBackTees.com
A treasure trove of liberal wit, wisdom and quotations, from ancient to modern, on colorful, cotton tees.

Support Independent Artists
Amazing art, crafts, apparel, paper-goods and more. A carefully curated selection of sundries since 1999.

FREE CONNECTIONS FOR GREEN SINGLES
Meet progressive singles in the environmental, vegetarian & animal rights community who share your values