A Top Coronavirus Official Was Forced to Dance Around a Big Question: Should Trump Hold Rallies?

Anthony Fauci “wouldn’t publicly criticize” cancelling them.

Alex Wong/Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

Last week, Anthony Fauci, a member of President Trump’s coronavirus task force and one of the country’s most trusted infectious disease experts, told Politico, “you don’t want to go to war with a president.”

“But,” he cautioned, “you got to walk the fine balance of making sure you continue to tell the truth.”

On Monday evening, in perhaps the most fraught example yet of Fauci’s delicate attempt to fulfill his public health duties without pissing off the president, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases danced around the question of whether the president should continue to hold campaign rallies amid the outbreak, with more than 500 Americans testing positive for the coronavirus disease in 35 states.

During a White House press conference announcing the forthcoming release of new guidelines for Americans to protect themselves against the coronavirus, Fauci said that governors, mayors, and other individuals (such as festival organizers) who are cancelling large-scale public events are probably acting out of “an abundance of caution,” and are typically in areas of “documented community spread” of the virus.

Those areas—where there have been documented cases in which the source of the coronavirus infection is unknown—include the region around Seattle; Santa Clara County, California; Westchester County, New York; and Florida, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But Fauci warned, “it’s a possibility that there’s community spread going on in areas in which we’re not detecting it yet.”

Pressed on the topic of campaign rallies by a journalist, Fauci first said he couldn’t comment, before adding that it would depend on the circumstances and timing—in a seeming attempt to avoid getting tied into any singular position on the topic.

“If you’re talking about a campaign rally tomorrow in a place where there is no community spread, I think the judgment to have it might be a good judgement,” he said. “If you want to talk about large gatherings in a place where you have community spread, I think that’s a judgement call. And if someone decides they want to cancel it, I wouldn’t publicly criticize it.”

Watch the exchange:

Trump’s last campaign rally was in Charlotte, North Carolina, and smaller campaign events and fundraisers continued last week and over the weekend. His campaign website currently shows no scheduled rallies, even though the campaign’s communication director insisted Sunday that the campaign is “proceeding as normal” despite concerns about the coronavirus.

Meanwhile, the president is still putting himself out there, doing the thing health officials are telling Americans not to do: shaking hands.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.