Was An Anti-Abortion Protestor Gunned Down For His Beliefs?

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


A 63-year-old anti-abortion protestor named James Pouillon was shot to death this morning outside a high school in Owosso, a small Michigan town not far from Flint. According to news reports, Pouillon—who was carrying graphic photos of aborted fetusus—died after being struck by multiple shots fired from a moving pick-up truck. Already, some pro-lifers have dubbed him a martyr, and Concerned Women for America wants Attorney General Eric Holder to acknowledge Pouillon’s death as he did the murder of abortion doctor George Tiller earlier this year. Details are still murky, but local authorities are saying that the alleged shooter was indeed motivated by Pouillon’s pro-life protests.

 

Police have charged Harlan James Drake, 33, with murdering both Pouillon and a second man. Shiawassee County Prosecutor Randy Colbry told reporters that Drake also planned to kill a third target but was arrested before he could do so. According to the Detroit Free Press, which has the most detailed account of the shootings so far:

Colbry said authorities do not believe that the two homicides and the third plot were related, saying “They stemmed from individual grievances Drake had with the victims.”

Colbry said the grievances were not known in detail, but that the killing of Mr. Puillon was related to the latter’s anti-abortion protest. But he said, “The defendant was offended by the manner of Mr. Pouillon’s message.”…

[Owosso Public Safety Director Mike Compeau] said it was not known what abortion views are held by the shooting suspect.

Google doesn’t yield much on Drake; I’ll update if new details emerge.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate