Coal Ally Defeats Coal Ally in Indiana Senate Race

Evan Bayh’s opposition to President Obama’s climate policies wasn’t enough.

Michael Conroy/AP


Republican Rep. Todd Young has defeated former Democratic Sen. Evan Bayh in the Indiana Senate race after a hard-fought contest in which both candidates ran pro-coal campaigns.

Evan Bayh, the state’s former Democratic senator, is one of the few Democrats this year to champion the coal industry. On his campaign website, he touted his opposition to a cap-and-trade plan backed by President Barack Obama during his first term that would have limited carbon emissions. In 2009, Bayh said on MSNBC’s Hardball that the bill put jobs at risk in coal states, including Indiana.

In line with his pro-coal stance, Bayh said during a debate last month that he opposes Obama’s Clean Power Plan, which is intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from coal power plants. “I don’t agree with the Clean Power Plan,” he said. “That’s something I disagree with Mrs. Clinton on. I think those things would be harmful to Hoosier consumers.” Bayh’s campaign website declared: “Evan Bayh supports Indiana’s coal industry, including opposing the EPA’s coal rules.”

Like Bayh, Young opposes cap-and-trade proposals and the Clean Power Plan. Young is an outspoken opponent of the so-called “War on Coal” and calls coal “a vital part of ensuring Hoosiers have access to affordable electricity.” In 2014, as a candidate for the US House of Representatives, Young cited his support for “energy efficiency measures” such natural gas, while saying that carbon dioxide emissions are a global problem and that the United States should not “unilaterally tax our power, our people, to solve a global problem.” The previous year, according to the Bloomington Herald Times, he told a group of protesters gathered outside his office, “I don’t deny climate change. I would put myself in the agnostic category.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate