Senate Confirms Trump’s Controversial EPA Pick—Without Reading His Emails

McConnell explains why he didn’t delay Scott Pruitt’s vote: “Because I choose not to.”

Scott PruittTom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom via ZUMA


Scott Pruitt was confirmed Friday as the nation’s 14th administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, despite the fact that a trove of emails between Pruitt’s office and fossil fuel interests have still not been made public. Democrats and environmental activists have strongly criticized Pruitt’s record as attorney general of Oklahoma—a record that included a number of lawsuits aimed at blocking Obama-era EPA regulations concerning pollution and climate change.

Pruitt will be sworn in before the public can review his emails from his tenure as attorney general.

Pruitt was approved 52-46 on a largely party-line vote. Two Democrats, Joe Manchin (W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), voted to confirm Pruitt. Both represent deep-red states that are heavily dependent on fossil fuel extraction, and both are facing tough reelection battles in 2018. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine was the only Republican to vote against Pruitt.

That means Pruitt will be sworn in before the Center for Media and Democracy and the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma get their hands on his emails from his tenure as attorney general. The groups initially requested the release of email communications between Pruitt’s office and fossil fuel interests more than two years ago, but Pruitt staffers didn’t fulfill the request. Last week, following a lawsuit and a number of requests for additional emails, Pruitt’s office released 411 of the more than 3,000 relevant emails.

On Thursday, an Oklahoma judge ruled in CMD and the ACLU’s favor, ordering Pruitt’s office to turn over the rest of the 2,500 emails—by next Tuesday. But with Pruitt’s vote scheduled for today, that ruling provided little help for Democrats and green groups who hoped to use the information as part of the confirmation battle.

While it’s unlikely there are any smoking guns in the emails that would have been enough to change Republicans’ minds on Pruitt, Democratic senators called for another 248 hours of debate, which would have in effect delayed the confirmation vote until February 27, after the deadline for making the emails public. The Democrats’ motion failed by a majority vote that fell strictly along party lines. In a twist, both Heitkamp and Manchin voted in favor of extending debate, though they ultimately ended up supporting Pruitt’s confirmation. Collins, meanwhile, voted against extending the debate and then proceeded to vote against confirmation.

At a press conference Friday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was asked why he didn’t postpone the vote until after Pruitt’s emails became available. “Because I choose not to,” he responded.

Once Pruitt is sworn in, the administration’s efforts to shrink the EPA’s staff, cripple its work on climate change, and undo Obama-era regulations will begin in earnest. With Pruitt at his side, President Donald Trump is expected to sign between two and five executive orders targeting the EPA next week.

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

One More Thing

And it's a big one. Mother Jones is launching a new Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on the corruption that is both the cause and result of the crisis in our democracy.

The more we thought about how Mother Jones can have the most impact right now, the more we realized that so many stories come down to corruption: People with wealth and power putting their interests first—and often getting away with it.

Our goal is to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We're aiming to create a reporting position dedicated to uncovering corruption, build a team, and let them investigate for a year—publishing our stories in a concerted window: a special issue of our magazine, video and podcast series, and a dedicated online portal so they don't get lost in the daily deluge of headlines and breaking news.

We want to go all in, and we've got seed funding to get started—but we're looking to raise $500,000 in donations this spring so we can go even bigger. You can read about why we think this project is what the moment demands and what we hope to accomplish—and if you like how it sounds, please help us go big with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate