Beyoncé’s Hurricane Video Shows She Knows More About Science Than the Entire GOP

We fact-check the pop superstar on climate change.

Stephen Lew/Cal Sport Media via AP

Beyoncé—Houstonian, pop superstar, feminist, essayist—joined other celebrities Tuesday to raise money for Hurricane Harvey disaster relief. During “Hand in Hand,” a telethon, Beyoncé took the opportunity to link the recent flooding in Houston and the catastrophic monsoon in India, to man-made global warming.

“The effects of climate change are playing out around the world every day,” the singer said. “Just this past week, we’ve seen devastation from the monsoon in India, an 8.1 earthquake in Mexico and multiple catastrophic hurricanes,” she said in a pre-recorded clip (highlights below). “Irma alone has left a trail of death and destruction from the Caribbean to Florida to the Southern United States. We have to be prepared for what comes next.”

Let’s take a look at Beyoncé’s climate claims.

An increasingly large body of scientific evidence shows that extreme weather is being made worse by man-made climate change. A more violent planet—wetter and hotter—likely super-sized Harvey and Irma’s destruction, writes our Climate Desk colleague, Eric Holthaus, this week. He points out that the US government’s Climate Science Special Report (leaked early to the New York Times for fear of censorship by the Trump Administration) confirms hurricanes are getting worse due to climate change: “Both physics and numerical modeling simulations indicate an increase in tropical cyclone intensity in a warmer world, and the models generally show an increase in the number of very intense tropical cyclones. For Atlantic and eastern North Pacific hurricanes and western North Pacific typhoons, increases are projected in precipitation rates and intensity. The frequency of the most intense of these storms is projected to increase in the Atlantic and western North Pacific and in the eastern North Pacific.” The same is true for the annual monsoons in India.

But earthquakes, like the one in Mexico? That science is not so clear, ‘Yoncé.

Bill McGuire, a climate professor at University College London, argued in his 2013 book, Waking the Giant, that climate change could produce more “extreme geological events”—earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes. He contends that shifting water from melting ice caps and long-term extreme rainfall could disrupt the Earth’s delicate, interconnected web of tectonic plates. And while we don’t yet know enough about exact triggers of individual earthquakes, one example McGuire pointed to later was the Nepal earthquake in 2015: the weight and size of the South Asian monsoon might have caused a build up of energy around the Himalayan plates that grind together to produce powerful earthquakes. He put the phenomenon this way in The Guardian:

Across the world, as sea levels climb remorselessly, the load-related bending of the crust around the margins of the ocean basins might – in time – act to sufficiently “unclamp” coastal faults such as California’s San Andreas, allowing them to move more easily; at the same time acting to squeeze magma out of susceptible volcanoes that are primed and ready to blow.

Others have expressed some skepticism about McGuire’s thesis. Roland Bürgmann from the University of California, Berkeley, is quoted as saying “it would take a long time.” (A thorough and accessible review can be found at Yale’s “e360” podcast.)

Earthquake thing aside, Beyoncé still knows more about the science than most of Congress and the White House. EPA chief Scott Pruitt told CNN ahead of Irma that it was “insensitive” to talk about climate change while the storm hit. President Trump has previously called it a hoax. On Twitter, Beyoncé’s video was compared directly to President Trump’s response to Harvey:

This isn’t the first time I’ve shoe-horned Beyoncé into Mother Jones climate coverage. In 2013, record industry data suggested that releasing her self-titled fifth album online first, instead of as a CD, might have cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80 percent compared to a regular release.

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk


Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend


Give a Year of the Truth

at our special holiday rate

just $12

Order Now

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.