Uh, What on Earth Is Scott Pruitt Talking About in This Bizarre Clip?

Bad news for apple orchards.

Coal: threeart/Getty. Apple: dcdr/Getty

Environmentalism means a lot of things to a lot of people, but Scott Pruitt, whose job is to protect the environment, has come up with a unique definition. While Hurricane Harvey was still battering Houston, the Environmental Protection Agency chief explained to a conservative radio show that the environment is like an apple orchard, and we should be harvesting the hell out of it. 

On August 28, the EPA chief did an interview with conservative syndicated radio host Joe “Pags” Pagliarulo and was asked about his plans to “reassess some of the ridiculous regulations” standing in the way of more oil drilling. 

Pruitt answered:

“What your question really goes to the heart of—and something I’ve been asking and really trying to force thought—is what is true environmentalism? Is true environmentalism, do not touch? Or is it, hey, we’ve been blessed with natural resources across our country and we should use and cultivate those natural resources with environmental sensitivity, environmental stewardship for future generations? It’s the latter, not the former.”

He illuminated his point with an unexpected metaphor:

“It’s like having a beautiful apple orchard that could feed the world, but the environmentalists put up a fence around the apple orchard and say do not touch the apple orchard because it may spoil the apple orchard. Instead of, what, cultivating and using the apple orchard and exporting that fruit to feed the world. We as a country feed the world. We as a country power the world.”

While Pruitt was happy to extoll the virtues of fossil fuels, he’s told other outlets that it’s “insensitive” to hurricane victims to focus on climate change. 

Pruitt of course didn’t mention that his beautiful apple orchard comes with some nasty side effects: Smoggy skies, sea-level rise, health problems, and even more catastrophic storms like Harvey and Irma

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.