Kids Suing the Government Over Climate Change Will Get Their Day in Court After All

The Supreme Court says the Trump administration can’t stop the suit—again.

Plaintiffs in the climate change lawsuit rally outside the federal courthouse in Eugene, Oregon on October 29. Robin Loznak/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

For the second time in just over three months, the Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration’s effort to delay a climate change lawsuit led by 21 young plaintiffs. The lawsuit, Juliana v. US, which alleges that the federal government created a national energy system that causes climate change—therefore depriving the plaintiffs of their constitutional rights, will proceed after a new trial date is set.

On Friday, the Supreme Court issued an order denying an earlier stay, although it noted that the administration may still have grounds to take its arguments to stop the case to the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. At the end of the three-page order, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch both indicated they would have granted the government’s request for a stay, which would have effectively halted the case. Hours after the court issued its order, the plaintiffs requested a status conference to decide on a new date for the trial. 

On October 19, Chief Justice John Roberts had issued an order to stay the proceedings pending the plaintiffs’ response to the government’s request to narrow the case. The plaintiffs filed a 103-page response shortly a few days later, in which they argued that their “case involves claims for infringement of their fundamental rights not to be deprived of their personal security and family autonomy, as well as specific and systemic government discrimination against them as a class in violation of their right to equal protection under the law,” according to a press release from Our Children’s Trust, a nonprofit supporting the plaintiffs.

On Monday, when the trial was originally slated to begin, the plaintiffs, ages 11 to 22, joined hundreds of activists in a protest in support of the lawsuit in Eugene, Oregon. Native Americans, activists, and religious leaders spoke at the rally, their words broadcast by bicycle-powered speakers. 

The case got its start in 2015, when Julia Olson, an attorney from Eugene, gathered young climate advocates and additional attorneys to file the suit against the government. Since inheriting the case, President Donald Trump’s administration has made several attempts to stop it. “These young people deserve [the] chance to present their case against those who govern and let the light fall where it may,” Olson said in a press release last week.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.