Tweet!

Tom Lee is unhappy about journo-twittering:

As a cheap and fun SMS interface for media outlets I have no beef with it; as a means of personal marketing for journalists, the pretense and lack of honesty is dismaying….I’d say the median journotweet is something like “getting ready to sit down for an i/v w @spalin. the lady is a tough cookie!” when in fact it should be closer to “complaining abt blogs in line to pick up kids @ sidwell frnds. no poor people around!”

Peter Suderman concurs that journo-tweeting is “almost universally vapid and uninforming.”  No argument from me on that score, but I suppose there’s nothing really all that wrong with journalistic self-promotion either.  Having watched their demographics grow ever more AARP-ish for years, and having missed several boats already to get younger readers/viewers interested in their product, I suppose the news industry really, really doesn’t want to miss yet another one.  They probably figure that Twitter is helping them capture the news consumers of the future.

Plus there’s the fact that every once in a great while, a reporter puts something useful up.  And even if it happens only once in a thousand tweets, that still means you’d better be participating so you don’t miss out.  There’s nothing worse in DC than having someone ask “Have you heard about ______?” and being forced to admit that you haven’t.  Especially if the reason you haven’t heard it is simply because you’re too neanderthal and out of touch to have the right technology.  Thus are boomlets born.

(But is Twitter a bubble?  For those of you who think bubbles are easy to spot while they’re happening, you need to answer Right Now.  And show your work, please.  In a couple of years we’ll find out which of you was right.)

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.