Articles of War


Wikipedia’s open-editing policy occasionally spawns all-out showdowns in which
users try to “revert” one another’s disagreeable entries into oblivion. A few
examples, as collected on the online encyclopedia’s “Lamest Edit Wars” page
(itself the subject of not a little nitpicking):

  • Cat: “34 reverts in just over an hour. The pressing issues: Should
    one unremarkable photo be included? Is the cat depicted really smiling?…
    As it turned out, the photo was deleted for not having any copyright status.”
  • Mama’s Family: “Was Mama (Vicki Lawrence) ‘pro-active,’ ‘foxy,’ ‘clever,’
    ‘cunning,’ or none of the above? Apparently this question is important enough
    to occupy over 30 edits in one day.”
  • List of virgins: “Dispute about whether or not Britney Spears belonged
    on the list, eventually resolved in a definitive manner: maintenance of the
    list proved impossible and it was later deleted.”
  • Wii: “Does it rhyme with ‘We’ or ‘Wee’? Should ‘Wee’ link to urine?…
    Should urine be mentioned in the article at all? Just some of the hard hitting
    issues that provoked in excess of 1,500 edits in the space of two weeks…
    All this for a videogame console that hasn’t even been released yet.”
  • Feces: “Should the article on feces include [a] picture of a large
    human turd? As of early July 2005, the discussion on this issue alone had
    reached 12,900 words.”
  • Nancy Reagan: “Was she born in 1921? Or 1923? After days of editing,
    does anyone really care THAT much? Woman is old.”

Fact:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn’t fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation so we can keep on doing the type of journalism that 2018 demands.

Donate Now