Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Wikipedia’s open-editing policy occasionally spawns all-out showdowns in which
users try to “revert” one another’s disagreeable entries into oblivion. A few
examples, as collected on the online encyclopedia’s “Lamest Edit Wars” page
(itself the subject of not a little nitpicking):

  • Cat: “34 reverts in just over an hour. The pressing issues: Should
    one unremarkable photo be included? Is the cat depicted really smiling?…
    As it turned out, the photo was deleted for not having any copyright status.”
  • Mama’s Family: “Was Mama (Vicki Lawrence) ‘pro-active,’ ‘foxy,’ ‘clever,’
    ‘cunning,’ or none of the above? Apparently this question is important enough
    to occupy over 30 edits in one day.”
  • List of virgins: “Dispute about whether or not Britney Spears belonged
    on the list, eventually resolved in a definitive manner: maintenance of the
    list proved impossible and it was later deleted.”
  • Wii: “Does it rhyme with ‘We’ or ‘Wee’? Should ‘Wee’ link to urine?…
    Should urine be mentioned in the article at all? Just some of the hard hitting
    issues that provoked in excess of 1,500 edits in the space of two weeks…
    All this for a videogame console that hasn’t even been released yet.”
  • Feces: “Should the article on feces include [a] picture of a large
    human turd? As of early July 2005, the discussion on this issue alone had
    reached 12,900 words.”
  • Nancy Reagan: “Was she born in 1921? Or 1923? After days of editing,
    does anyone really care THAT much? Woman is old.”

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate