The administration promises that managed competition will guarantee quality of care. Indeed, Clinton’s health-security plan proposes an elaborate structure to assure quality that relies almost exclusively on data collected from patient-satisfaction surveys. The problem is that such mechanisms fail to grasp how HMOs can rig the game.

As one health-care professional puts it, “Most patients don’t have the strength or the energy to scrutinize quality of care.” To do this, they need help from providers. But managed-care companies have little interest in constructive criticism. At McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts, for example, executives were told that Blue Cross/Blue Shield did not award them a managed-care contract in part because the staff had taught patients how to stand up for themselves and family members. BC/BS learned through patient satisfaction surveys that physicians and nurses had even suggested that patients sue the insurer for refusal of care. They informed the hospital that unless its staff ceased such practices, no future contract would be awarded.

This kind of economic blackmail muzzles providers who have firsthand experience of assembly line health care. Almost every doctor and nurse we spoke to about the cost-driven practices that increasingly dominate the health-care scene was afraid to talk on the record. Tracey McKnight, director of a nonprofit home health-care agency in Holland, Michigan, expressed their worry: “How active do you become exposing all this, when you might lose referrals?”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.