Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The administration promises that managed competition will guarantee quality of care. Indeed, Clinton’s health-security plan proposes an elaborate structure to assure quality that relies almost exclusively on data collected from patient-satisfaction surveys. The problem is that such mechanisms fail to grasp how HMOs can rig the game.

As one health-care professional puts it, “Most patients don’t have the strength or the energy to scrutinize quality of care.” To do this, they need help from providers. But managed-care companies have little interest in constructive criticism. At McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts, for example, executives were told that Blue Cross/Blue Shield did not award them a managed-care contract in part because the staff had taught patients how to stand up for themselves and family members. BC/BS learned through patient satisfaction surveys that physicians and nurses had even suggested that patients sue the insurer for refusal of care. They informed the hospital that unless its staff ceased such practices, no future contract would be awarded.

This kind of economic blackmail muzzles providers who have firsthand experience of assembly line health care. Almost every doctor and nurse we spoke to about the cost-driven practices that increasingly dominate the health-care scene was afraid to talk on the record. Tracey McKnight, director of a nonprofit home health-care agency in Holland, Michigan, expressed their worry: “How active do you become exposing all this, when you might lose referrals?”

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate