How many people can reasonably live on the earth is perhaps the most urgent question of our time. But the relationship between overcrowding, degradation of the environment, and consumption of resources has proved complex. The prevailing notion used to be that if the industrialized nations provided poorer countries with development aid and birth control services, birthrates would drop. Now that idea seems both high-handed and inadequate, an imposition of Western values on countries whose inhabitants consume far less than us anyway.

So how do we address this pressing problem? The most radical solution may be to reframe the question. A consensus is emerging that rather than asking what we can do to make women have fewer babies, we need to ask what we can do to improve women’s lives, how we can give everyone an equal stake in the planet’s future. This newfound attention to the status of women is exciting–but it will be short-lived if it is perceived as failing to address the underlying population concern.

To defuse that danger, we must comprehend the problem broadly–it is about long-term sustainability for us all. And to understand women’s role in the solution, we must first listen to their stories, which are complex, often even contradictory.

Mother Jones launched the following project, “In Her Hands,” in collaboration with project directors Peter Menzel and Faith D’Aluisio. They sent a team of photographers and interviewers around the globe to talk with women about their lives and their hopes for their children; we excerpt the interviews here. The complete project will be published by Sierra Club Books next fall.

  • WOMEN’S WORK by Vivienne Walt With their new credibility, can global women leaders bring grassroots change?
  • NINE LIVES: PORTRAITS OF WOMEN Photos and interviews with women on their work, their families, and their hopes.
  • WHAT IT WILL TAKE by Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Gretchen C. Daily Improving women’s lives–a starting point for population control–is good for all.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate