Deconstructing Tobacco

The RJR documents on Camels and kids—a MoJo Wire <A HREF="/news_wire/tobacco_doc1.html">annotation</A>.


It’s not often evidence emerges that shows a corporation contemplating a life of crime as part of its overall marketing strategy. Then again, only few companies make a product that, as the old joke goes, kills you when used as directed.

As part of the settlement of a lawsuit brought against R.J. Reynolds by more than a dozen California cities and counties for targeting children with its marketing campaigns, the cigarette-maker recently released thousands of pages of confidential marketing documents, many of which reveal how the company hoped to “youthen [its] brand” by targeting “the 14 to 24 age group.”

RJR denies the documents were ever meant to be implemented as part of a marketing strategy. Perhaps. But it is interesting to note that the documents below—with all their “cool attitudes” references—were written in 1986, two years before the introduction of our favorite, recently departed phallic symbol, Joe Camel.

Marketing to children is one thing, but there’s something else going on here—an abstract academese that conspires with smoke-blowing adspeak to produce a work of such euphemistic repetition that we can’t help but wonder if perhaps a new addition to the Surgeon General’s disclaimer repertoire is in order: WARNING: Selling cigarettes may cause brain damage, and may complicate candor, decency, and the ability to communicate without using phrases like “full/authentic smoking satisfaction.”

For your full reading satisfaction, we’ve annotated one of the latest “smoking gun” documents. Just move your mouse over the highlighted areas—and enjoy.

Start here.

G. Beato is a regular contributor to Suck and Mother Jones.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.