Logrolling in Our Times

Peeking into the pork barrel of political magazines

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In today’s political arena, holding office is just a time-consuming distraction from the real task of running for office. After all, only perpetual campaigning can overcome rampant voter apathy and ever increasing industry competition. Political magazines are faced with essentially the same challenges, except their “elections” happen for them every time a new issue hits the newsstands.

Best cover line The vision thing Community outreach program The requisite intermedia mudslinging Gratuitous celebrity cross-promotion Blatant pandering
The Nation “Starr’s Grand Jury Abuses” “E.L. Godkin, the first Nation editor, is credited with being the first writer to use quotation marks to indicate skeptical irony.” Caribbean cruise where you can watch Nation columnists venomously snipe at each other in person rather than just in print. “On the much discussed matter of CNN’s wounded ‘credibility,’ the network has almost always whored for the Pentagon, shamelessly relaying its lies and evasions.” Two poems about 1998’s Most Intriguing Personality, Monica Lewinsky’s semen-stained dress. See left.
Mother Jones “Women and Booze” Make it look more like George: “Our redesign is based on the idea that crucial information and its presentation must amount to more than mere data — it should dare to be engaging.” Gourmet utility consumers who choose Green Mountain Energy Resources’ new “electricity blend” get a free subscription. You’re reading it. Four photos of probable voter Gillian Anderson. Big photo of drunken, bikini-clad coed with Miller beer box stuck over her postfeminist head.
George “Top 10 Funniest Politicians” Aims to be a lightweight piece of fluff you really shouldn’t read, but do: “…we don’t want this issue to be…some weighty tome you really should read but never do.” Special naked editor pull-out centerfold poster. (Not yet implemented.) “Over the years, CNN staffers have groused that the network’s bland, unsophisticated look has hurt ratings.” Four-page spread on obscure South African starlet who seems (understandably) confused about who’s interviewing her: “South Africans don’t have sexy presidents covered in People,” she says. “Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg traded her judicial robes for her party clothes.”
National Review “Al Gore’s Bogus Global Warming Crusade” “I have a dream. Suppose we wake up on New Year’s Day 2000 and find that the computers are right — it really is 1900.” Caribbean cruise where you can indulge in complimentary Hennessey and Montecruz cigars — and kiss William F. Buckley’s mottled patrician ass. “The online magazine Salon — generally an echochamber for the White House line — outlines the anti-Silberman case in detail.” WFB “Well, we were having the nicest time…when who sits down with us but WFB! I thought your father would faint!”
American Spectator “The Russians Rip Off NASA” “In due course we won’t have Mr. Clinton, or even Steven Brill, to kick around anymore, but the empty culture which brought them into being isn’t going away. Who might its new heroes be?” Allegedly subsidizes vast right-wing conspiracy of key Whitewater witnesses, bait-shop-owning spies, and other assorted Arkansan exotica. “Neither Miss Smith nor Mr. Glass will be invited back, though they are perfectly free to write for Salon magazine, where their fictive talents can be added to those of Mr. Jonathon Broder [and] Mr. Murray Waas.” Neo-Barris game show auteur, Ben Stein, writes regular column about being rich and mildly annoyed. Predictably ample “Asian Women Desire Romance! “mail-order chattel section. (Who says multiculturalism’s only for the left?)

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate