The Cheney Loyalty Test

Why did Alan Larson, a Clinton undersecretary, keep his job under Bush?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


When a new president takes office, high-ranking officials appointed by the previous administration are usually replaced as quickly as possible. That was certainly the case with the Bush administration, which wasted little time in accepting the resignations of each of the 37 officials who served as undersecretaries for Bill Clinton — except one.

The lone survivor of the political housecleaning was Alan Larson, who continues to serve in the State Department as undersecretary of state for economic affairs. The exception is particularly notable, observers say, given that Bush demands absolute loyalty from his appointees. “It’s unusual,” notes Paul Light, who studies presidential appointments for the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank. “Undersecretary positions are very high-ranking plums. You generally would use them to reward someone who is faithful to the president and to no previous administration.”

But Undersecretary Larson, as it happens, may have had a chance to demonstrate his faithfulness even before Bush was elected president. In February 2000, Larson received a visit from Dick Cheney, then the CEO of Halliburton. According to a source familiar with the meeting, Cheney wanted to express concern over a State Department decision to block $500 million in federal loan guarantees to a Russian company called Tyumen Oil. Larson was responsible for the issue at State. Sources say the State Department had blocked the aid after the CIA warned that Tyumen and its owners, a Russian conglomerate called the Alfa Group, were suspected of tampering with courts to stage hostile takeovers of rival companies. BP Amoco and other investors in one of those rivals had also lodged complaints, accusing Tyumen of driving the firm into bankruptcy and attempting to steal its assets in a rigged auction.

The decision to block the deal was bad news for Cheney, since Tyumen was supposed to pass along nearly $300 million of the federal subsidies to Halliburton to help refurbish a Siberian oil field. So at his meeting with Larson, Cheney warned that refusing the aid to Tyumen might cost jobs at Halliburton.

Cheney got his way. Two months after he met with Larson, the State Department withdrew its objections and agreed to release the money. When Bush and Cheney moved into the White House the following January, Larson kept his job.

In deciding to keep Larson, a career Foreign Service official, the State Department says that “questions of loans, contracts, or individual companies were never raised nor even considered.” Insiders say Larson is now considered something of a rising star in the administration. In October, he was sent on high-profile missions to Saudi Arabia and other oil-supply nations to secure a commitment for increased production should Iraq’s oil taps get turned off because of war.

The fortunes of Tyumen and its parent company have likewise soared. Last summer the administration signed a deal with the Alfa Group to explore a series of oil projects in Russia. And in October, not long after Cheney suggested allowing Russian companies to supply the United States with oil, Tyumen became the first Russian firm to deliver oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, providing the federal government with 285,000 barrels.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate