Western Conservatives Seek Clampdown on Courts

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


Furious over recent court rulings in favor of same-sex marriage and other offenses against their idea of all that’s right and good, conservatives in several Western states are pushing ballot measures that would limit the power and independence of judges, the Los Angeles Times reports.

A measure in South Dakota would allow citizens to sue judges over their rulings (but can they go on to sue the second judge if he or she don’t rule against the first?). One in Colorado would impose term limits on judges, another in Montana would allow residents to easily recall them, and yet another in Oregon would require high court judges “to be elected by geographic district, so they reflect the values of conservative rural communities as well as the liberal legal establishment in Portland,” sums up the Times.

Judges, presumably, will put up a fight against these impositions on their authority, and they’re no slouches in the electoral politics arena. In the many states in which they are elected, judicial candidates have for years been raking in huge campaign contributions.

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

PLEASE—BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things it doesn’t like—which is most things that are true.

We’ll say it loud and clear: At Mother Jones, no one gets to tell us what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please do your part and help us reach our $150,000 membership goal by May 31.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate