Nancy Pelosi: Fiery, Liberal, and She’s in Charge


This assertive headline from the Globe and Mail says that Nancy Pelosi will be the one in control. The UK’s Guardian acknowledged Pelosi will be perfoming a delicate balancing act with President Bush, but will have access to a “formidable machine.”

American news agencies have put forward a more sceptical view of Pelosi’s ability to maintain control over the opposing parties in the House. According to this article posted in the International Herald Tribune:

Her pledge to treat Republicans more fairly than they have dealt with Democrats could be “the first casualty of a Pelosi speakership,” said Jack Pitney, a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College in California who has written extensively about Congress.

The article also lists “a halting television presence” as one of the fiery leader’s major weaknesses.

And USA Today reported that Pelosi may not be ready for prime time:

Longtime political observer Stephen Hess of the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, says Pelosi “is no Newt Gingrich. She really isn’t intellectually interesting. Gingrich came up with ideas … With her, I don’t know whether that’s true or not. We have to see if she is really ready for prime time.”

— Caroline Dobuzinskis

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate